Madrasah Teacher Data Collection After Simpatika: System Transition, Feature Gaps, And Operator Challenges

Authors

  • Finan Ahsani Taqwim UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Zaefa Khatun Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi DIY, Indonesia
  • Karwadi Karwadi UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v4i1.1034

Keywords:

Financing Teachers and Educational Personnel, EMIS GTK IMP, Information System Transition, Educational Data Management, Ministry of Religious Affairs

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the constraints in collecting data on madrasah teachers and education personnel and to formulate improvement efforts in the context of data system transition within the Ministry of Religious Affairs. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with operators at the central Ministry of Religious Affairs, operators at the Regional Office of the Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Special Region of Yogyakarta, and madrasah operators, supported by a review of relevant documentation. The data were analyzed thematically through the stages of condensation, categorization, theme identification, and interpretation. The findings show that the unpreparedness of data on teachers and education personnel is not caused by a single factor, but by a combination of system readiness, organizational readiness, and actor readiness. At the system level, problems emerged in the form of the transition from SIMPATIKA to EMIS GTK IMP that was not yet fully mature, incomplete data migration, incomplete features, slow servers, and suboptimal data integration across ministries or institutions. At the organizational level, the problems were reflected in the high workload of operators and the limited number of personnel. At the actor level, the constraints appeared in the varying competencies of operators and the low awareness of teachers and education personnel as data owners. This study recommends a gradual application transition, case-based technical assistance, strengthened helpdesk support, restructuring of operator workloads, periodic data verification by teachers and education personnel, data integration, and the development of processed data dashboards to support data-based policy-making.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Maazmi, A., Piya, S., & Araci, Z. C. (2024). Exploring the Critical Success Factors Influencing the Outcome of Digital Transformation Initiatives in Government Organizations. In Systems (Vol. 12, Issue 12, p. 524). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12120524

Barchard, K. A., & Pace, L. A. (2011). Preventing human error: The impact of data entry methods on data accuracy and statistical results. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1834–1839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.004

Bernardo, B. M. V., Mamede, H. S., Barroso, J. M. P., & dos Santos, V. M. P. D. (2024). Data governance & quality management—Innovation and breakthroughs across different fields. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100598

Buzogány, A., & Pülzl, H. (2024). Chapter 9: Top-down and bottom-up implementation (pp. 116–126). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885905.00016

Coleman, A., BILLINGS, J., ALLEN, P., MIKELYTE, R., CROKE, S., MACINNES, J., & CHECKLAND, K. (2021). Ambiguity and Conflict in Policy Implementation: The Case of the New Care Models (Vanguard) Programme in England. Journal of Social Policy, 50(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0047279420000082

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://lccn.loc.gov/2016052733

Curran, F. C., Carlo, S., & Harris-Walls, K. (2024). Making the Data Visible: A Systematic Review of Systems-Level Data Dashboards for Leadership and Policy in Education. Review of Educational Research, 96(1). https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241288249

Damayanti, S., & Rizal, D. A. (2021). Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan (SIMPATIKA) Sebagai Dasar Pengambilan Keputusan dan Kebijakan di Kementerian Agama. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(1). https://journal.rumahindonesia.org/index.php/njpi/index

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam. (2026). Surat Edaran: Impelementasi EMIS-GTK Madrasah (baru). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam, Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. https://srikandi.arsip.go.id/result-scan/155tSLSaKgqjKM7m0-leLw

Fajar. (2021). Transformasi Digital Pendidikan Keagamaan, Kemenag Rilis EMIS 4.0 (Berita). Kanwil Kementerian Agama Provinsi DKI Jakarta. https://dki.kemenag.go.id/berita/transformasi-digital-pendidikan-keagamaan-kemenag-rilis-emis-40-ot3KW

Ghalavand, H., Shirshahi, S., Rahimi, A., Zarrinabadi, Z., & Amani, F. (2024). Common data quality elements for health information systems: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 24(1), 243. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02644-7

Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024). Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda. Public Management Review, 26(7), 1963–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917

Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2003). The multi-layer problem in implementation research . Public Management Review, 5(4), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903032000178545

Islami, M. J. (2021). Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs). Jurnal Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi, Media Dan Informatika, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v9i1.3750

Isnani, P., Irwansyah, & Zuliana, E. (2023). Manajemen Operator dalam Meningkatkan Akurasi Administrasi di Sekolah (Studi di MIS Terpadu Al-Ikhwan) Tanjung Morawa. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 6(3), 160. http://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jrpp

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 83 Tahun 2022 tentang Pengelolaan Data Pendidikan pada Kementerian Agama. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Kirmadi, Y., Suryaman, M., & Ismaya, B. (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaan Data Pokok Pendidikan (Dapodik) Sebagai Instrumen Manajemen Pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Tahsinia, 6(9), 1417–1431. https://doi.org/10.57171/w4jqa069

Kupzyk, K. A., & Cohen, M. Z. (2015). Data Validation and Other Strategies for Data Entry. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 37(4), 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914532550

Lopes, A. S., Sargento, A., & Farto, J. (2023). Training in Digital Skills—The Perspective of Workers in Public Sector. Sustainability, 15(13), 1–15. https://doi.org/None

Luktafiani, S. (2024). Penerapan Education Management Information System (Emis) Sebagai Sistem Informasi Manajemen Pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah. JURNAL MAPPESONA, 7(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.30863/mappesona.v7i2.5522

Mahsur, & Margana. (2023). The Roles of School Operators in Managing Information Data as Guarantors of the Quality of Education Services. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi, Manajemen Dan Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, 5(2), 51–57. mailto:[email protected]

Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the Implementation Literature: The Ambiguity-Conflict Model of Policy Implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mohseni, Z. A., & Masiello, I. (2026). Co-designing, developing, and implementing multiple learning analytics dashboards for data-driven decision-making in education: a design-based research approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 74(2), 517–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10577-9

Mubarok, H. (2022). Implementasi Education Management Information System ( EMIS ) Dalam Mengelola Data Lembaga Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Darussa’adah Gubugklakah Kecamatan Poncokusumo Kabupaten Malang. Leadership: Jurnal Mahasiswa Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 3(1), 876. https://doi.org/10.32478/leadership.v3i1.876

Müller-Bloch, C., & Kranz, J. (2015). A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2015/proceedings/ResearchMethodology/11

Nurzen, M. (2022). Data-based decision making for education planning: strategies for principal success. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 10(4), 589–596. https://doi.org/10.29210/189500

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://lccn.loc.gov/2014026331

Rahayuningsih, S. (2021). Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS). Alhamra Jurnal Studi Islam, 1(2), 110–117. https://doi.org/10.30595/ajsi.v1i2.10128

Sabatier, P. A. (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: a Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X00003846

Salsabila, N. F. (2026). Pengaruh Integrasi Sistem Informasi SIMPATIKA/EMIS (EMIS 4.0) Terhadap Efektivitas Kinerja Pegawai di Kementerian Agama Kabupaten Jember. Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Trisna, R. E., Hidayah, N., Sahudi, & Maarif, S. (2025). Eksistensi Aplikasi EMIS GTK Dalam Meningkatkan Efektivitas Dan Efisiensi Pengelolaan Data Pendidikan Islam. Kariman: Jurnal Pendidikan Keislaman, 13(2 SE-Articles), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.52185/kariman.v13i2.901

Wahab, N. Y. A., Rahman, R. A., Mahat, H., Hudin, N. S., Ramdan, M. R., Razak, M. N. A., & Yadi, N. N. M. (2024). Impacts of Workload on Teachers’ Well-Being: A Systematic Literature Review. TEM Journal, 13(3), 2544–2556. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM133-80

Wahyuni, H., Mutiarin, D., Pribadi, U., Ismail, N. S. A., Purnomo, E. P., & Kumorotomo, W. (2024). Maturity of data interoperability cross-organizations in supporting the concept of one employment data at the ministry and regional government levels. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2407936

Wang, D., Galster, M., & Morales-Trujillo, M. (2025). Information needs in bug reports for web applications. Journal of Systems and Software, 219, 112230. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112230

Wendelborn, C., Anger, M., & Schickhardt, C. (2023). What is data stewardship? Towards a comprehensive understanding. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 140, 104337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104337

Wibowo, A. (2021). MANAJEMEN PERUBAHAN, Change Management. Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik Bekerja sama dengan Universitas Sains & Teknologi Komputer (Universitas STEKOM).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

Taqwim, F. A., Khatun, Z., & Karwadi, K. (2026). Madrasah Teacher Data Collection After Simpatika: System Transition, Feature Gaps, And Operator Challenges. Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(1), 360–381. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v4i1.1034

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.