Virtual Laboratories Meet Eco-Critical Literacy: A Bibliometric Mapping of Science Education Landscapes

Erni Dwiastuti; Asri Widowati

doi:10.61650/alj.v4i1.1071

Authors

Erni Dwiastuti Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Email : [email protected]
Asri Widowati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Email : [email protected]

https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.1071

Keywords: Bibliometric analysis, virtual laboratory, critical thinking skills, environmental awareness, science learning

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has transformed science education through virtual laboratories, offering interactive and safe learning environments. However, comprehensive studies mapping the specific convergence between virtual laboratory-based science learning, critical thinking, and eco-critical literacy remain limited. This study aims to map the research landscape of virtual laboratory-based science education related to critical thinking skills and environmental awareness through a bibliometric approach. Data were collected from Google Scholar using Publish or Perish, yielding 995 relevant publications analyzed via VOSviewer version 1.6.20 through co-occurrence, network, overlay, and density visualizations. The findings indicate that virtual laboratories have become a prominent theme in contemporary science education, with dominant keywords including virtual laboratory experiment, science process skill, critical thinking skill, scientific literacy, and environment. Network analysis identified six major research clusters representing learning outcomes, skills development, pedagogical approaches, emerging technologies, methodologies, and contexts. Furthermore, overlay and density visualizations revealed a significant shift from mere technology implementation toward competency development and sustainability-oriented learning, highlighting artificial intelligence, virtual reality, augmented reality, and environmental education as emerging themes with substantial future potential. In conclusion, this study contributes to a better understanding of virtual laboratory research development and proposes future research directions focusing on intelligent learning, immersive environments, critical thinking enhancement, and sustainability-oriented science education to foster eco-critical literacy.

Adedokun, O. A., Parker, L. C., Childress, A., Burgess, W., Adams, R., Agnew, C. R., Leary, J., Knapp, D., & Shields, C. (2013). Effect of time on perceived gains from an undergraduate research program. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 728–738.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.005

de Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (7th ed.). Insight Assessment.

Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education. In eLearning and Software for Education Conference (pp. 133–141).

Harzing, A. W. (2024). Publish or Perish. Publish or Perish Official Website

Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010

Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106

Kapici, H. O., Akcay, H., & de Jong, T. (2019). Using hands-on and virtual laboratories alone or together—Which works better for acquiring knowledge and skills? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 231–250.

Lindsay, E. D., & Good, M. C. (2005). Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(4), 619–631.

Makransky, G., Thisgaard, M., & Gadegaard, H. (2016). Virtual simulations as preparation for laboratory exercises. Laboratory Medicine, 47(3), 251–258.

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

Poo, M. C. P., Lau, Y. Y., & Chen, Q. (2023). Are virtual laboratories and remote laboratories enhancing the quality of sustainability education? Education Sciences, 13(11), 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111110

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

Raman, R., Achuthan, K., Nair, V. K., & Nedungadi, P. (2022). Virtual laboratories: A historical review and bibliometric analysis of the past three decades. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11055–11087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11058-9