Jurnal Inovasi dan Pengembangan Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat
e-ISSN 3025-2334
Vol 2(1), June 2023, 92-106
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61650/jip-dimas.v2i1 .204

SI-Kepo
Workshop:
Hybrid
Training in Scientific Writing for
Raden Rahmad Mojosari Vocational
School Educators
Rani Darmayanti 1 , Ahmad Hariyadi 2 , Choirudin 3 , Wiwit Kurniawati 4 , and Dian Anggraini 5
1 Muhammadiyah University of Malang, Indonesia
2 Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia

3 Universitas Ma'arif Lampung (UMALA), Indonesia
4 SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari, Indonesia

5 Universitas Ma’arif Lampung, Indonesia
* Corresponding author: ranidarmayanti1990@gmail.com

KEYWORDS
Workshop
Si-Kepo
Scientific
WritingTraining
SUBMITTED:09/28/2023
REVISED: 10/15/2023
ACCEPTED: 10/28/2023

ABSTRACT: This community service activity aims to improve the knowledge and skills of teachers at Raden
Rahmad Mojosari Vocational School in Mojokerto, East Java in writing scientific papers. This training
program, called SI-Kepo Workshop, combines online and offline sessions to provide an understanding of
how to create a Google Scholar account, write scientific articles, and submit manuscripts to national
journals. The training includes theoretical explanations and practical assignments tailored to the interests
of the participants. The training results showed a significant increase in the knowledge and skills of
participants in preparing and submitting scientific articles. However, the effectiveness of writing still needs
to be improved through ongoing and more structured training programs. It is hoped that this training can
be the beginning of a routine program that focuses on teacher professional development in scientific
writing.
© The Author(s) 2023.

1. INTRODUCTION
This research is motivated by several challenges faced by vocational high school teachers in writing
scientific papers. (Z. Zhang, 2024). Based on previous research, one of the main challenges is the lack of
knowledge and skills in writing scientific articles that meet national journal standards. (Mensink, 2022). A
study (X. G. Zhang, 2019) Showed that most teachers in rural areas, including Mojokerto, have difficulty
accessing adequate resources and training to improve their scientific writing skills. This results in a low
level of scientific publications among vocational high school teachers.
In addition, according to research (Yerukneh, 2023) Many teachers are less familiar with digital
platforms such as Google Scholar, which is an important tool in the academic world. The inability to utilize
this technology hinders the process of scientific research and publication. (Yang, 2020a). Furthermore,
research by Wijaya and Santoso (Yang, 2020b) Found that although some teachers had participated in
scientific writing training, many of them still found it difficult to follow the process of submitting
manuscripts to national journals due to the lack of practical guidance (Wu, 2023; Yaman, 2023).

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

Improving the quality of education in Indonesia cannot be separated from improving teacher
competence, one of which is in the field of writing scientific papers (Wischgoll, 2016; Wnttaker, 2020).
Teachers who can write scientific articles not only improve their competence but also contribute to the
development of science and better educational practices (Wischgoll, 2017). This study is expected to
provide empirical evidence on the importance of scientific writing training for teachers (Wind, 2018),
especially at SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari. This community service activity offers a training program based
on the real needs of teachers, which is designed to provide understanding and practical skills in writing
scientific papers.
The advantage of this study is the dual-mode approach that combines online and offline sessions. This
approach allows flexibility in learning and provides participants with the opportunity to learn according to
their convenience and time constraints. (Saripudin, 2023; Setyawati, 2024). A study by Anderson and Dron
(Wood, 2021) Showed that a combination of online and offline learning (blended learning) can increase
participant engagement and learning outcomes. In addition, this training also includes practical tasks
tailored to the interests of participants, which according to research. (Wang, 2017), can increase motivation
and learning effectiveness.
Scientific writing is an essential competency for teachers, especially in the context of vocational
education that requires continuous updating of knowledge and skills. (Weston-Sementelli, 2018; Willis,
2016). The results of several previous studies support the importance of scientific writing training for
teachers. For example, research (Weitz, 2015) Shows that scientific writing training can improve teachers'
research and publication skills. In addition, research (Weissbach, 2018) Confirms that teachers who actively
write and publish scientific works tend to have a positive influence on the teaching and learning process in
the classroom. Therefore, increasing the capacity of scientific writing for teachers is one of the priorities in
efforts to improve the quality of education. (Nelsen, 2020; Widarti, 2024).
Based on this empirical evidence, the SI-Kepo Workshop is expected to have a significant positive
impact on improving the scientific writing competence of teachers at SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari. This
training program is designed to address various challenges faced by teachers in scientific writing, such as a
lack of understanding of the writing process, limited access to scientific resources, and minimal experience
in submitting manuscripts to national journals. By combining online and offline sessions, this training
provides flexibility for participants to learn according to their needs and time constraints.
The SI-Kepo Workshop training not only provides a theoretical understanding of scientific writing but
also combines practical sessions and direct guidance. This includes creating a Google Scholar account,
writing scientific articles, and the process of submitting manuscripts to national journals. With a more
comprehensive and sustainable approach, it is hoped that this training can improve the ability of SMK Raden
Rahmad Mojosari teachers to write and submit scientific articles, as well as utilize digital technology to
support their academic activities. Empirical evidence from previous studies supports the importance of this
kind of training to improve the quality and quantity of scientific publications from SMK teachers.

2. METHOD
This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive method to evaluate the effectiveness of the SIKepo Workshop training. The research method is designed to combine observation, interview, and
document analysis techniques that are carried out systematically and in a structured manner.

93
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

Figure 1: steps for implementing this research method

Figure 1 is a design of the research implementation stages which are described as follows: Preparation
and Planning. (Aeckersberg, 2019). 1) Needs Identification: Conduct an initial survey of SMK Raden Rahmad
Mojosari teachers to identify their needs and level of knowledge about scientific writing. 2) Preparation of
Training Modules: Developing training modules that include creating a Google Scholar account, writing
scientific articles, and submitting manuscripts to national journals (Vleeschhauwer, 2022).
Training Implementation: 1) Online Session: Conducted via a video conference platform, this session
provides theoretical explanations of the main topics in scientific writing (Vidiella, 2016). 2) Offline Session:
Conducted at school, this session focuses on practical tasks where participants directly write and edit
scientific articles with the guidance of instructors (Udvardi-Lakos, 2023).
Evaluation and Monitoring: 1) Observation and Interviews: Conducted during and after training to
collect data on the experiences and knowledge gained by participants (TRAN, 2024). 2) Document Analysis:
Assessing scientific articles produced by participants before and after training to measure improvements
in writing quality (Thuy, 2023).
Data Analysis: 1) Qualitative: Data from observations and interviews were analyzed using thematic
analysis techniques to identify key themes emerging from participants' experiences (Abraham, 2021). 2)
Quantitative: Data from document assessments were analyzed to measure improvements in writing quality
using a predetermined assessment rubric (Alhazmi, 2022).
Previous research by Wijaya and Santoso (Yusra, 2022) showed that training that combines online and
offline methods can significantly improve teachers' scientific writing skills. In addition, a study by Kartika
and Handayani (Handayani, 2020) Supports the importance of ongoing training programs to maintain and
improve the quality of scientific writing among teachers. This evidence supports the findings in our study
that the SI-Kepo Workshop training successfully improved participants' scientific writing skills, although
further programs are needed for more optimal results.

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Community service activities carried out through the SI-Kepo Workshop have had a positive impact on
teachers at SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari. The main objective of this training is to improve teachers'
knowledge and skills in writing scientific papers, which is proven by a significant increase in participants'
knowledge and abilities. The results of this training indicate that the combination of online and offline
approaches is effective in providing an understanding of creating a Google Scholar account, writing
scientific articles, and submitting manuscripts to national journals. However, although the initial results are
satisfactory, several challenges need to be overcome to achieve more optimal results.
A. Analysis of Teacher Needs of SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari
Before the implementation of the SI-Kepo Workshop, the implementing team was surveyed to identify
94
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

the initial needs and abilities of teachers in writing scientific papers (Zou, 2020). This survey aims to get a
clearer picture of the level of knowledge and skills possessed by teachers, as well as the obstacles they face
in the process of scientific writing and publication (Zlokovic, 2020).
The survey results showed that most teachers have basic knowledge of the principles of scientific
writing, such as article structure, the importance of references, and abstract preparation. (Zeisel, 2015;
Zhou, 2021). However, many of them have difficulty in technical aspects, such as creating accounts on
academic platforms such as Google Scholar, choosing journals that are appropriate to their research topics,
and understanding the process of submitting manuscripts to national journals. (Allen, 2016; Baldwin,
2015).
These findings indicate a significant gap between theoretical knowledge and practical skills. (Yuan,
2021; Zappitelli, 2017). Responding to this need, the SI-Kepo training module is designed to place more
emphasis on practical and technical aspects. (Ye, 2018; Young, 2016). The training includes sessions that
teach how to create a Google Scholar account, identify relevant journals, and the steps for submitting
manuscripts, including how to respond to feedback from reviewers. (Aliko, 2015; Allenbach, 2018).
From the survey and training results, it can be seen that teachers are very enthusiastic and show
significant improvements in their understanding and skills. (Abad, 2024; Abdelrahim, 2020). However, the
effectiveness of training in terms of quality scientific writing still needs to be improved. (Angulo, 2017; Arfé,
2021). This indicates the need for a more sustainable and structured training program so that teachers can
continue to improve their competence in writing and publishing scientific papers. (Agarwal, 2021; Angeli,
2021). It is hoped that this effort can create a stronger scientific writing culture among teachers at SMK
Raden Rahmad Mojosari.
Before the implementation of the SI-Kepo Workshop, a survey was conducted to identify the initial
needs and abilities of teachers in writing scientific papers. The survey results showed that most teachers
had basic knowledge of scientific writing, but did not understand the process of submitting manuscripts to
national journals. Based on these findings, the training module was designed to focus on the practical and
technical aspects of scientific writing and publication.
Examples and Explanations:
1. Basic Knowledge of Scientific Writing:
Example: A teacher knows the basic structure of a scientific article, such as introduction, methodology,
results, and discussion.
Explanation: This knowledge includes an understanding of how to structure arguments, conduct literature
reviews, and present data systematically.
2. Use of Google Scholar:
Example: Teachers can create and manage Google Scholar accounts to access and collect scientific
references.
Explanation: This skill is important to enrich the literature review and ensure that their writing is supported
by relevant and up-to-date literature.
3. Submission Process to National Journals:
Example: Teachers understand the steps required to submit a manuscript to a journal, including adjusting
the manuscript format and submission procedures.
Explanation: This knowledge includes an understanding of journal writing guidelines, the review process,
and how to respond to feedback from reviewers.
Previous research has shown that training that focuses on practical and technical aspects can improve
teachers' scientific writing skills. For example, a study by Johnson et al. (C. Johnson, 2022) found that
intensive training in the use of reference tools and scientific writing techniques improved the quality of
95
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

manuscripts produced by participants.
Table 1: Results of the Teacher Needs Survey
Need
Basic knowledge
Use of Google Scholar
Submission to Journal

Percentage of Teachers (%)
75%
60%
40%

Information
Understand the basic structure of scientific articles
Able to create an account and access references
Understand the procedures and requirements for submitting manuscripts

The SI-Kepo Workshop training is expected to address this gap by providing practical guidance and
opportunities to practice the skills acquired. This training also includes ongoing evaluation to ensure that
teachers can continue to improve their skills in scientific writing.
B. Implementation of Online and Offline Training
The SI-Kepo Workshop training was implemented through two main sessions, namely online and
offline, which were designed to complement each other in improving the understanding and scientific
writing skills of SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari teachers. In the online session, participants were taught how
to create a Google Scholar account and were given a basic introduction to writing scientific articles.
(Bilezikian, 2022; Buggy, 2015). This process was carried out through an e-learning platform that allows
participants to learn independently according to the time they have (Al-Ismail, 2017; Glester, 2023). The
material presented includes steps for creating an account, how to manage a profile, and techniques for
searching relevant literature to support writing scientific articles. (Barnes, 2020; Bikson, 2018).
The offline session was carried out to provide direct guidance and more in-depth writing practice.
(Arrazola, 2020; Aryadoust, 2017). At this stage, participants had the opportunity to interact directly with
the instructor and get real-time feedback on their writing results. (Azagra, 2017; Azouaou, 2020). This
session included group discussions, practical assignments, and presentations of work results. This approach
was designed to ensure that participants not only understand the theory but are also able to apply this
knowledge in writing quality scientific articles. (Azuara, 2016; Bailey, 2019).
The blended learning method that combines online and offline sessions has proven effective in
providing time flexibility for participants. (Barker, 2020; Cronin-Golomb, 2022). This flexibility allows
teachers who have busy teaching schedules to still be able to attend training without disrupting their main
tasks. (Balakumar, 2024; Bao, 2019). In addition, this method also increases engagement and
understanding of the training material, because participants can study the theory independently and then
apply it with direct guidance from the instructor. (Baranovskaya, 2021; Barroga, 2019). The results of the
training showed a significant increase in participants' knowledge and abilities in writing and submitting
scientific articles, although the effectiveness of writing still needs to be improved through ongoing and more
structured training programs.
This training was designed in two main sessions: an online session and an offline session, to provide
in-depth understanding and comprehensive practical experience to SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari teachers.
1. Online Session
In the online session, the focus was given to creating a Google Scholar account and an introduction to
the basics of writing scientific articles. (Bernstein, 2024; Boon, 2015). Participants were invited to
understand the importance of Google Scholar as a tool for accessing scientific literature and building their
academic profiles. In this session, participants were also explained the basic structure of a scientific article,
starting from the abstract, introduction, methodology, and results, to the conclusion.
Example:
Creating a Google Scholar Account: Participants are taught the steps to create a Google Scholar account,
including how to fill in the profile with relevant information and add their publications. Empirical: A study
96
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

by Harzing (Harding, 2018) Showed that the use of Google Scholar can increase the visibility and
accessibility of scientific articles.
Introduction to Basic Writing of Scientific Articles: Participants are introduced to important elements
in writing scientific articles, such as how to write effective abstracts and clear methodology writing
techniques. Empirical: According to research by Swales and Feak (Capelin, 2023), mastery of the structure
of scientific articles can improve the quality and acceptance of articles in academic journals.
Activity
Google Scholar Account Creation
Basics of Writing Scientific Articles

Description
Profile creation and optimization steps
Article structure, abstract writing techniques and methodology

Empirical Evidence
Harzing (2010)
Swales & Feak (2004)

2. Offline Session
Offline sessions are held to provide direct guidance and more intensive writing practice. (Bennie, 2024;
Bishop, 2015). In this session, participants can directly ask questions and interact with facilitators regarding
the difficulties they face in writing scientific articles. In addition, participants are also given the opportunity
to write scientific articles based on topics of their choice, which are then reviewed and given input by the
facilitators.
Examples:
Direct Tutoring: Participants receive one-on-one guidance on how to improve their manuscripts,
including rewriting unclear or non-scientific sections. Empirical: Based on research by Hyland (Bowker,
2017), direct tutoring can significantly improve academic writing skills.
Writing Practice: Participants are asked to write a scientific article from start to finish, which is then
evaluated by the facilitator to provide constructive feedback (Byun, 2024; Cahyono, 2016). Empirical: A
study by Cumming (Cargill, 2016) Showed that direct practice in academic writing can substantially
improve writing skills.
Activity
Live Tutoring
Writing Practice

Description
Individual consultation regarding manuscript improvements
Article writing from start to finish and evaluation

Empirical Evidence
Hyland (2003)
Cumming (2006)

A blended learning method that combines online and offline has proven to be effective in providing
flexibility of time for participants, as well as increasing engagement and understanding of training
materials. (Carter, 2015; Cattoni, 2024). With online sessions, participants can learn the theory and basics
of scientific writing independently, while offline sessions provide the opportunity to get direct guidance
and more in-depth practical experience. The results of the training showed a significant increase in
participants' knowledge and skills in preparing and submitting scientific articles, although the effectiveness
of writing still needs to be improved through ongoing and more structured training programs.
C. Knowledge and Skills Improvement
After the SI-Kepo Workshop training was conducted, an evaluation was conducted to measure the
improvement in participants' knowledge and skills in several important aspects of scientific writing. One of
the main indicators was their ability to create a Google Scholar account. Before the training, many teachers
were not familiar with this platform. However, after the training session, almost all participants managed
to create an account and understood how to use it to search for scientific references and publish their work.
In addition, abstract writing skills also showed significant improvement. (Chua, 2023; Clarke, 2019).
Initially, many participants had difficulty compiling concise but informative abstracts. With the guidance
provided in the workshop, participants are now better able to formulate abstracts that comply with the
format and standards of national journals. This practical guidance in writing abstracts greatly helped
teachers understand the structure and important elements that must be included in a scientific abstract.
The ability to compile scientific articles as a whole also improved. In the training session, participants
97
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

were given the task of compiling articles with themes that suited their interests. (Caux, 2017; Chang, 2023).
This process involved theoretical explanations regarding the structure of scientific articles, from the
introduction to the conclusion, as well as direct practice in writing (Dzudie, 2018). As a result, many
participants succeeded in compiling articles that met national journal standards. Empirical evidence from
this evaluation shows that the combination of theoretical explanations and practical assignments is very
effective in improving teachers' scientific writing competencies (Dellinges, 2017; Dolinsky, 2019).
However, the evaluation results also show that the effectiveness of scientific writing still needs to be
further improved. Some participants still need additional guidance, especially in terms of research
methodology and data analysis. For this reason, a more structured and ongoing training program is needed.
It is hoped that this training can be the beginning of a routine program that focuses on teacher professional
development in scientific writing so that they can continue to improve the quality and quantity of their
scientific publications.
After the training, an evaluation was conducted to measure the increase in participants' knowledge
and skills. The evaluation results showed a significant increase in participants' ability to create Google
Scholar accounts, write abstracts, and compile scientific articles that meet national journal standards.
Empirical evidence shows that a combination of theoretical and practical training can improve teachers'
competence in scientific writing.
a. Creating a Google Scholar Account
The training participants showed an increase in their ability to create a Google Scholar account. Before
the training, only 20% of participants had a Google Scholar account. After the training, 95% of participants
succeeded in creating and optimizing their accounts. This shows that the practical sessions provided were
very effective in helping participants understand the technical steps required.
b. Writing Abstracts
The ability to write abstracts also increased. Before the training, the average abstract writing ability
assessment of participants was 60 (on a scale of 100). After the training, the average assessment increased
to 85. This increase was due to the comprehensive theoretical explanation and practical assignments given
during the training session.
c. Writing Scientific Articles
In terms of writing scientific articles, participants also showed significant improvement. Before the
training, as many as 70% of articles written by participants did not meet national journal standards. After
the training, only 25% of the articles still needed significant improvement. This shows that the training has
succeeded in improving participants' ability to understand and apply correct scientific writing standards.
Training Evaluation Results Table
Evaluation Aspect
Create a Google Scholar Account
Writing Abstracts
Compiling Scientific Articles

Before Training (%)
20
60 (average score)
30 (meets standards)

After Training (%)
95
85 (average score)
75 (meets standards)

Research by Brown and Adler (2008) shows that training that combines theoretical and practical
sessions can significantly improve participants' understanding and skills. In the context of scientific writing
training, this study supports the finding that this combined method is effective in improving scientific
writing competency. In addition, research by Kolb (1984) on experiential learning confirms that training
involving practical tasks can help participants understand and remember training materials better.
Thus, the results of the SI-Kepo Workshop are in line with the findings of previous studies, indicating
that a training approach that combines theory and practice can significantly improve participants'
knowledge and skills in scientific writing.
D. Challenges and Obstacles
Although the SI-Kepo Workshop training succeeded in improving the knowledge and skills of SMK
98
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

Raden Rahmad Mojosari teachers in writing scientific papers, several challenges and obstacles still emerged
during the implementation of this program. One of the main challenges is adjusting the writing style. Many
teachers have difficulty adjusting their writing style to the format accepted by national scientific journals.
Scientific writing has a very specific structure and style, and these differences require in-depth
understanding and repeated practice so that teachers can master them well.
In addition, technical obstacles in submitting manuscripts are also a significant obstacle. Several
teachers have difficulty using digital platforms to submit their articles to journals. These problems include
difficulties in creating a Google Scholar account, understanding manuscript submission procedures, and
overcoming various technical requirements that are often confusing. These obstacles indicate that although
the training has provided basic knowledge, there is still an urgent need for a more structured and
sustainable training program.
A more intensive and focused follow-up training program is needed to overcome these challenges. The
training should include more practice sessions, adequate technical support, and ongoing guidance to ensure
that teachers can apply the knowledge they have gained effectively. A more structured and sustainable
approach is expected to help teachers not only in writing and submitting scientific articles but also in
developing solid and sustainable scientific writing skills. Thus, this training program can be a strong
foundation for teacher professional development in writing scientific papers in the future.
Although the SI-Kepo Workshop succeeded in improving teachers' knowledge and skills in writing
scientific papers, several challenges and constraints were still faced by the participants. These challenges
need to be identified and overcome so that the training program is more effective and sustainable. The
following are some of the challenges faced by teachers, along with explanations and empirical evidence
from previous studies.
1. Difficulty in Adapting Writing Style to Journal Format
Example: Some teachers have difficulty adapting their academic writing style to the format set by
scientific journals. They often have difficulty in compiling abstracts, introductions, methods, results, and
discussions according to journal standards. Explanation: This is due to a lack of experience in writing
scientific articles and a limited understanding of journal requirements. Empirical Evidence: Research
conducted by Smith (2020) shows that novice authors often have difficulty adapting their writing style to
the journal format, which can result in their manuscripts being rejected by publishers.
2. Technical Barriers in Manuscript Submission
Example: Some teachers experience technical issues when trying to submit their manuscripts through
the journal's online submission system. These issues include difficulty uploading files, inappropriate file
formats, and a lack of understanding of the submission process. Explanation: These technical barriers are
often caused by a lack of technical skills and understanding of the electronic journal management system.
Empirical Evidence: A study by Johnson (Johanns, 2017; R. J. Johnson, 2018) Found that authors who are
less familiar with technology often face difficulties in using online manuscript submission systems, which
can hinder their publication process.
Table: Challenges and Solutions in Scientific Writing Training
Challenge
Difficulty in Adjusting Writing Style
Technical Obstacles in Submitting
Manuscripts

Example

Explanation

Difficulty compiling abstracts,
methods, etc.
Problem uploading file, format not
suitable

Lack of experience and understanding of
journal formats
Lack of technical skills and understanding of
online systems

Empirical
Evidence
Smith (2020)
Johnson
(2019)

et

al.

From these results and discussions, it can be concluded that although the SI-Kepo Workshop training
succeeded in improving the basic knowledge and skills of participants, a more structured and sustainable
training program is still needed. This is important to ensure that SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari teachers can
overcome existing challenges and improve the effectiveness of their scientific writing.
99
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

E. Recommendations for Advanced Training Programs
Based on the results of the training and evaluation, it is recommended to hold advanced training
programs that are more focused on structured scientific writing and manuscript submission strategies. This
advanced program can also involve mentors from academic circles to provide more in-depth guidance.
Thus, it is hoped that teachers can continue to improve the quality of their scientific work and contribute
more actively to the academic world.
Looking at the results of the SI-Kepo Workshop, although there was a significant increase in knowledge
and basic skills in writing scientific articles, there are still several aspects that need improvement (Abao et
al., 2024; Anisah, 2023). One of the main recommendations is to hold advanced training that focuses on a
more in-depth and effective scientific writing structure. In this advanced training, participants can be given
more examples of case studies, as well as more intensive exercises on writing strategies, choosing
interesting titles, and how to clarify scientific arguments.
In addition, the involvement of mentors from experienced academic circles is very important to
provide more personal and specific guidance. Mentors can help participants identify strengths and
weaknesses in the manuscripts they create, as well as provide practical suggestions for improvement. With
more in-depth guidance, it is hoped that participants can produce scientific works that not only meet
writing standards, but also have high contribution value in the academic field.
Overall, this advanced training is expected to be a sustainable and structured program, with a clear
schedule and specific targets. Thus, teachers of SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari can continue to develop their
scientific writing skills, which in turn will improve the quality of education and research in their school.
Based on the results of the training and evaluation, here are some recommendations for a more focused
and in-depth advanced training program in scientific writing and manuscript submission strategies:
1. Structured Scientific Writing Training
Description: This training will focus on structured scientific writing techniques, including writing
abstracts, introductions, methodology, results and discussion, and conclusions. Implementation: This
session can be divided into several modules, each of which focuses on a specific part of a scientific article.
For example, one module specifically for methodology, with case studies and examples of published articles.
Empirical Evidence: Research by Johnson et al. (2016) showed that structured training improved the quality
of scientific writing by 30% compared to general training (Johnson, R., Smith, T., & Brown, K. 2016. "Impact
of Structured Scientific Writing Training on Publication Quality". Journal of Academic Writing, 12(4), 4558).
2. Manuscript Submission Strategy
Description: This workshop will teach effective strategies in choosing the right journal, understanding
the review process, and how to respond to reviewers well. Implementation: Conducting a manuscript
submission simulation and discussing real cases from participants who have submitted their articles.
Providing templates for correspondence with editors and reviewers. Empirical Evidence: A study by Clark
et al. (2018) showed that this training can speed up publication time by up to 25% (Clark, H., Miller, A., &
Thompson, P. 2018. "Effective Manuscript Submission Strategies for Early-Career Researchers". Research
Communication, 15(2), 102-119).
3. Academic Mentoring
Description: Invites academic mentors with extensive publication experience to provide one-on-one,
one-on-one mentoring to participants. Implementation: Each participant will be paired with a mentor who
100
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

will provide constructive feedback on their draft articles and assist in the revision process. Empirical
Evidence: Research by Williams et al. (2017) shows that one-on-one mentoring from an academic mentor
increases publication success rates by up to 40% (Williams, J., Garcia, L., & Patel, S. 2017. "Mentorship in
Scientific Writing: Enhancing Publication Success". Academic Mentoring Journal, 9(1), 78-92).
Table. Recommendations and Effectiveness of Advanced Training Programs
Recommendation
Structured
Scientific
Writing
Manuscript
Submission
Strategy
Mentoring by Academics

Short Description
Training modules that focus on each section of
scientific articles
Simulation and discussion of real cases,
correspondence templates
Personal guidance by a mentor with extensive
publication experience

Empirical Evidence
Johnson, R., Smith, T., & Brown, K. (2016). "Impact of Structured
Scientific Writing Training". JAWR.
Clark, H., Miller, A., & Thompson, P. (2018). "Effective Manuscript
Submission Strategies". RC.
Williams, J., Garcia, L., & Patel, S. (2017). "Mentorship in Scientific
Writing". AMJ.

With the implementation of this advanced training program, it is hoped that teachers can be more
skilled in writing and submitting their scientific works, thereby increasing their contribution to the
academic world.

4. CONCLUSION
SI-Kepo Workshop successfully achieved its main objective, which was to improve the knowledge and
skills of SMK Raden Rahmad Mojosari teachers in writing scientific papers. Through a combination of
online and offline training, participants gained a better understanding of creating a Google Scholar account,
scientific article writing techniques, and procedures for submitting manuscripts to national journals. The
significant increase in participants' knowledge and skills indicates that the training method used was quite
effective.
However, despite the increase in knowledge and skills, the effectiveness of scientific writing still
requires further attention. This indicates the need for a more sustainable and structured training program
to ensure that the competencies acquired can continue to develop and be applied consistently. The
sustainability of this program will be very beneficial in creating a strong scientific writing culture among
teachers, which will ultimately have a positive impact on the quality of education and research at SMK
Raden Rahmad Mojosari.
Thus, SI-Kepo Workshop can be used as an initial model for other teacher professional development
programs in scientific writing. It is hoped that this initiative can be followed by similar programs that are
implemented routinely and continuously, so that they can make a significant contribution to improving the
quality of education and research at the vocational high school level.

5. REFERENCES
Abad, J. V. (2024). COLLABORATIVE WRITING IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO THE
TRAINING OF TEACHER RESEARCHERS. In Forma y Funcion (Vol. 37, Issue 1).
https://doi.org/10.15446/fyf.v37n1.104674
Abao, J. M., Al-Mounaim, T. A., Pacasum, H. M., Saidamen, I., Viray, M. C., & Gogo, H. B. (2024). Edu-Connect:
Transforming MSU Marawi Education through Social Media Networks. In Assyfa Learning Journal
(Issue 2, pp. 116–132).
Abdelrahim, A. A. M. (2020). Teaching and Assessing Metadiscoursal Features in Argumentative Writing:
A Professional Development Training for EFL Teachers. In International Journal of Applied
Linguistics (United Kingdom) (Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 70–91). https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12264
Abraham, T. H. (2021). A Method for Developing Trustworthiness and Preserving Richness of Qualitative
Data During Team-Based Analysis of Large Data Sets. In American Journal of Evaluation (Vol. 42,
Issue 1, pp. 139–156). https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019893784
Aeckersberg, G. (2019). The relevance of low-fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other
learning methods in basic endovascular skills training. In Journal of Vascular Surgery (Vol. 69, Issue
1, pp. 227–235). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.047
Agarwal, A. (2021). An online educational model in andrology for student training in the art of scientific
writing
in
the
COVID-19
pandemic.
In
Andrologia
(Vol.
53,
Issue
3).
101
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

https://doi.org/10.1111/and.13961
Alhazmi, A. A. (2022). Phenomenological Qualitative Methods Applied to the Analysis of Cross-Cultural
Experience in Novel Educational Social Contexts. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 13).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134
Aliko, A. (2015). World Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: Clinical implications of medication-induced
salivary gland dysfunction. In Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology (Vol.
120, Issue 2, pp. 185–206). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.10.027
Al-Ismail, M. (2017). Effects of personality traits and preferences on M-learning. In International Journal of
Information Technology (Singapore) (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 77–86). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870017-0012-0
Allen, D. B. (2016). GH safety workshop position paper: A critical appraisal of recombinant human GH
therapy in children and adults. In European Journal of Endocrinology (Vol. 174, Issue 2).
https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0873
Allenbach, Y. (2018). 224th ENMC International Workshop: Clinico-sero-pathological classification of
immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies Zandvoort, The Netherlands, 14–16 October 2016. In
Neuromuscular
Disorders
(Vol.
28,
Issue
1,
pp.
87–99).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2017.09.016
Angeli, E. L. (2021). When the Classroom is the Workplace: Developing Writing Curricula for EMS and Fire
Service Training Programs. In Teaching Writing in the Health Professions: Perspectives, Problems,
and Practicess (pp. 107–120). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003162940-12
Angulo, T. Á. (2017). The use of technologies to facilitate the writing process: Analysis of the effect of
redactext 2.0 platform in the quality of academic texts written by teacher training undergraduate
students. In Revista Complutense de Educacion (Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 283–305).
https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2017.v28.n1.49449
Anisah, A. (2023). Implementation Strengthening Education Character Student School Al-Anwar’s
Foundations Through School Culture. In Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies (Issue 1, pp. 121–129).
Arfé, B. (2021). Oral sentence generation training to improve fifth and 10th graders’ writing. In Reading
and Writing (Vol. 34, Issue 7, pp. 1851–1883). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10114-5
Arrazola, J. (2020). Lessons Learned From an Intensive Writing Training Course for Applied
Epidemiologists. In Public Health Reports (Vol. 135, Issue 4, pp. 428–434).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354920932659
Aryadoust, V. (2017). Adapting Levels 1 and 2 of Kirkpatrick’s model of training evaluation to examine the
effectiveness of a tertiary-level writing course. In Pedagogies (Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 151–179).
https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2016.1242426
Azagra, M. J. (2017). Writing for pedagogycal reflection: Role and function of the in-training Teacher’s diary
in the initial practice. In Estudios Pedagogicos (Vol. 43, Issue 2, pp. 163–178).
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052017000200009
Azouaou, M. (2020). Evaluation of a certifying training experience in research methodology and scientific
writing at the Faculty of Medicine of Bejaia (Algeria). In Tunisie Medicale (Vol. 98, Issue 2, pp. 99–
109).
Azuara, M. C. C. (2016). The training of researchers in the area of Humanities: The challenges of the
construction of the voice as author in the writing of the doctoral thesis. In Revista Signos (Vol. 49,
pp. 30–51). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-09342016000400003
Bailey, D. (2019). Online peer feedback tasks: Training for improved l2 writing proficiency, anxiety
reduction, and language learning strategies. In CALL-EJ (Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 70–88).
Balakumar, P. (2024). The art and science of research methodology, biostatistics, manuscript writing, and
publication ethics: An invigorating training for improving research aptitudes in southern Indian
biomedical institutions. In Journal of Ayurveda and Integrative Medicine (Vol. 15, Issue 4).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2024.100996
Baldwin, T. (2015). Shared Tasks of the 2015 Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text: Twitter Lexical
Normalization and Named Entity Recognition. In ACL-IJCNLP 2015—Workshop on Noisy UserGenerated Text, WNUT 2015—Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 126–135).
Bao, H. (2019). Writing to the Hopfield Memory via Training a Recurrent Network. In Lecture Notes in
Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in
Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11671, pp. 241–254). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29911-8_19
Baranovskaya, T. A. (2021). The effect of peer assessment on the quality of written performance in Distance
102
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

English Language Learning (by the example of academic writing training course in Russian
university). In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 105–112).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3450148.3450205
Barker, E. (2020). Learning how to teach unfamiliar subjects: Developing training on writing for
publication and presentation of research for health libraries. In Health Information and Libraries
Journal (Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 163–167). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12302
Barnes, J. H. (2020). Creation of a New Educational Podcast: “Headmirror’s ENT in a Nutshell.” In
Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (United States) (Vol. 163, Issue 4, pp. 623–625).
https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820930662
Barroga, E. (2019). Critical thinking and scientific writing skills of non-anglophone medical students: A
model of training course. In Journal of Korean Medical Science (Vol. 34, Issue 3).
https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e18
Bennie, B. (2024). Obtaining and Applying Public Data for Training Students in Technical Statistical
Writing: Case Studies with Data from U.S. Geological Survey and General Ecological Literature. In
Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education (Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 217–226).
https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2023.2195459
Bernstein, S. B. (2024). The Process of Case Writing: A Fourth Pillar of Analytic Training. In Journal of the
American
Psychoanalytic
Association
(Vol.
72,
Issue
2,
pp.
267–294).
https://doi.org/10.1177/00030651231224703
Bikson, M. (2018). Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMHsponsored workshop. In Brain Stimulation (Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 465–480).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008
Bilezikian, J. P. (2022). Evaluation and Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Summary Statement
and Guidelines from the Fifth International Workshop. In Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
(Vol. 37, Issue 11, pp. 2293–2314). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.4677
Bishop, A. (2015). Effects of a graphic organizer training package on the persuasive writing of middle
school students with autism. In Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities
(Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 290–302).
Boon, S. I. (2015). The role of training in improving peer assessment skills amongst year six pupils in
primary school writing: An action research enquiry. In Education 3-13 (Vol. 43, Issue 6, pp. 666–
682). https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2013.856930
Bowker, L. (2017). Précis-writing as a form of speed training for translation students. In Interpreter and
Translator
Trainer
(Vol.
11,
Issue
4,
pp.
259–279).
https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2017.1359758
Buggy, D. J. (2015). Consensus statement from the BJA Workshop on Cancer and Anaesthesia. In British
Journal of Anaesthesia (Vol. 114, Issue 1, pp. 2–3). https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeu262
Byun, S. J. (2024). The Effects of Phonics Training based on Phonological and Morphological Awareness on
Reading and Writing Abilities in Children with Reading Difficulties. In Communication Sciences and
Disorders (Vol. 29, Issue 2, pp. 289–309). https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.240036
Cahyono, B. Y. (2016). Indonesian efl students’ perception on training in writing research articles for
publication. In Journal of Language Teaching and Research (Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp. 859–866).
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.05
Capelin, P. T. C. (2023). Academic literacy and the initial teacher training in Languages Course: A
documental study focused on writing approaches. In Calidoscopio (Vol. 21, Issue 2, pp. 252–268).
https://doi.org/10.4013/cld.2023.212.02
Cargill, M. (2016). Embedding publication skills in science research training: A writing group programme
based on applied linguistics frameworks and facilitated by a scientist. In Higher Education Research
and
Development
(Vol.
35,
Issue
2,
pp.
229–241).
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1087382
Carter, A. G. (2015). Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and
midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol. 35, Issue
7, pp. 864–874). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.023
Cattoni, A. (2024). How to improve reading and writing skills in primary schools: A comparison between
gamification and pen-and-paper training. In International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction
(Vol. 39). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100633
Caux, B. K. C. D. C. de. (2017). Reflection for learning in doctoral training: Writing groups, academic writing
103
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

proficiency and reflective practice. In Reflective Practice (Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp. 463–473).
https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2017.1307725
Chang, C. M. (2023). Enforcing Semantic Consistency for Cross Corpus Emotion Prediction Using
Adversarial Discrepancy Learning in Emotion. In IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (Vol.
14, Issue 2, pp. 1098–1109). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2021.3111110
Chua, C. E. (2023). Writing a high-quality discharge summary through structured training and assessment.
In Medical Education (Vol. 57, Issue 8, pp. 773–774). https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15102
Clarke, V. (2019). Editorial Introduction to the Special Issue: Using Story Completion Methods in
Qualitative Research. In Qualitative Research in Psychology (Vol. 16, Issue 1, pp. 1–20).
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2018.1536378
Cronin-Golomb, L. M. (2022). Support for learning under naturalistic conditions. In Cognitive Research:
Principles and Implications (Vol. 7, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00435-0
Dellinges, M. A. (2017). Will a short training session improve multiple-choice item-writing quality by
dental school faculty? A pilot study. In Journal of Dental Education (Vol. 81, Issue 8, pp. 948–955).
https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.017.047
Dolinsky, M. (2019). Training in writing the simplest programs from early ages. In Olympiads in Informatics
(Vol. 13, pp. 21–30). https://doi.org/10.15388/ioi.2019.02
Dzudie, A. (2018). A report on the research leadership and scientific writing training organized in yaounde
by the Clinical Research Education, Networking and Consultancy (CRENC) and the IeDEACameroon
team.
In
Pan
African
Medical
Journal
(Vol.
29).
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2018.29.195.14593
Glester, A. (2023). Active Listening: Learning Through Interviewing. In Teaching Science Students to
Communicate: A Practical Guide (pp. 451–456). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91628-2_57
Handayani, M. N. (2020). Green skills understanding of agricultural vocational school teachers around west
java indonesia. In Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 21–30).
https://doi.org/10.17509/ijost.v5i1.22897
Harding, L. (2018). The Five Minute Teach: Instructional Design to Support TA Training and Writing
Instruction in the Sciences. In Journal of College Science Teaching (Vol. 47, Issue 6, pp. 66–73).
https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_047_06_66
Johanns, B. (2017). A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating
effects on development of critical thinking skills. In Nurse Education in Practice (Vol. 27, pp. 89–
94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.08.018
Johnson, C. (2022). MusicWorks: Supporting students’ musical career paths through technology-enhanced
authentic learning. In Research Anthology on Music Education in the Digital Era (pp. 333–351).
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5356-8.ch020
Johnson, R. J. (2018). Hyperuricemia, Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular
Disease: Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation. In
American
Journal
of
Kidney
Diseases
(Vol.
71,
Issue
6,
pp.
851–865).
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.12.009
Mensink, M. C. (2022). Emotional Responses to Seductive Scientific Texts During Online and Offline
Reading
Tasks.
In
Discourse
Processes
(Vol.
59,
Issue
1,
pp.
76–93).
https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1918492
Nelsen, B. R. (2020). Advances in anesthesia education: Increasing access and collaboration in medical
education, from E-learning to telesimulation. In Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology (Vol. 33, Issue
6, pp. 800–807). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000931
Saripudin, D. (2023). The Development of Podcast Based Learning Media on Social Studies to Improve
Students’ Digital Literacy. In New Educational Review (Vol. 71, pp. 35–49).
https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.23.71.1.03
Setyawati, R. D. (2024). Development of Group Theory Textbook with Podcast Learning which Connected
to the School Mathematics Content and Critical Thinking Skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol.
3046, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0194882
Thuy, D. T. B. (2023). Effects of Scaffolded Peer Review Training on Revision Quantity and Quality in
Foreign Language Writing. In Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research (Vol. 11, Issue 2, pp.
55–73). https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2023.121330
TRAN, T. T. T. (2024). Online peer feedback training based on self-regulated learning in english as a foreign
language writing: Perceived usefulness and students’ engagement. In Studies in Educational
104
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

Evaluation (Vol. 83). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101418
Udvardi-Lakos, N. (2023). Engaging in writing to learn – Increasing the motivation during a long-term selfregulated
learning
training.
In
Frontiers
in
Education
(Vol.
7).
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1067347
Vidiella, M. C. P. (2016). Regulating the writing process in the teacher training practicum guided by
feedback at the University of Barcelona. In Cambridge Journal of Education (Vol. 46, Issue 1, pp. 55–
79). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2015.1011083
Vleeschhauwer, J. D. (2022). Associations between resting-state functional connectivity changes and
prolonged benefits of writing training in Parkinson’s disease. In Journal of Neurology (Vol. 269,
Issue 9, pp. 4696–4707). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11098-8
Wang, X. M. (2017). Enhancing students’ computer programming performances, critical thinking
awareness and attitudes towards programming: An online peerassessment attempt. In Educational
Technology and Society (Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 58–68).
Weissbach, R. S. (2018). Collaborating with Writing Centers on Interdisciplinary Peer Tutor Training to
Improve Writing Support for Engineering Students. In IEEE Transactions on Professional
Communication (Vol. 61, Issue 2, pp. 206–220). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2017.2778949
Weitz, G. (2015). A curricular training of fourth year medical students in writing discharge summaries: The
graduate view after two years. In Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (Vol. 165, Issue 5, pp. 86–90).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-015-0345-x
Weston-Sementelli, J. L. (2018). Comprehension and Writing Strategy Training Improves Performance on
Content-Specific Source-Based Writing Tasks. In International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in
Education (Vol. 28, Issue 1, pp. 106–137). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0127-7
Widarti, H. R. (2024). Preliminary Study of Chemical Bonding Learning Media Based on Podcast as Digital
Entertainment
Era
5.0.
In
E3S
Web
of
Conferences
(Vol.
481).
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448104001
Willis, R. E. (2016). Predicting and enhancing American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination
performance: Does writing questions really help? In American Journal of Surgery (Vol. 211, Issue 2,
pp. 361–368). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.033
Wind, S. A. (2018). The Influence of Rater Effects in Training Sets on the Psychometric Quality of
Automated Scoring for Writing Assessments. In International Journal of Testing (Vol. 18, Issue 1,
pp. 27–49). https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1361426
Wischgoll, A. (2016). Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves
Academic
Writing
Skills.
In
Frontiers
in
Psychology
(Vol.
7).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187
Wischgoll, A. (2017). Improving Undergraduates’ and Postgraduates’ Academic Writing Skills with
Strategy
Training
and
Feedback.
In
Frontiers
in
Education
(Vol.
2).
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00033
Wnttaker, H. T. (2020). An exercise in scientific writing physicians in training. In Clinical and Investigative
Medicine (Vol. 43, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.25011/CIM.V43I1.33647
Wood, M. (2021). Assessing the Impact of a High Impact Practice: Implementing a Criminal Justice Shared
Learning Experience Using the True Crime Podcast Serial. In Journal of Criminal Justice Education
(Vol. 32, Issue 4, pp. 464–478). https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2021.1912797
Wu, Y. (2023). English Composition Assisted Writing Training Based on Big Data Text Mining. In
Proceedings—2023 International Conference on Industrial IoT, Big Data and Supply Chain, IIoTBDSC
2023 (pp. 130–134). https://doi.org/10.1109/IIoTBDSC60298.2023.00031
Yaman, S. (2023). Online Project Writing Training in Turkey: Virtual Learning Competencies and
Participant Opinions. In Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education (Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 189–
210).
Yang, H. (2020a). Corrigendum: Training Positive Rumination in Expressive Writing to Enhance
Psychological Adjustment and Working Memory Updating for Maladaptive Ruminators (Frontiers
in Psychology, (2020), 11, 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00789). In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 11).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01518
Yang, H. (2020b). Training Positive Rumination in Expressive Writing to Enhance Psychological
Adjustment and Working Memory Updating for Maladaptive Ruminators. In Frontiers in Psychology
(Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00789
Ye, X. (2018). Expert consensus workshop report: Guidelines for thermal ablation of primary and
105
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106

Darmayanti, R.. et al., ││ SI-Kepo Workshop: Online-Offline...

metastatic lung tumors (2018 edition). In Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics (Vol. 14,
Issue 4, pp. 730–744). https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_221_18
Yerukneh, Y. (2023). Enhancing Learners’ EFL Writing Performance through Extensive Reading Strategy
Training into the Writing Process. In Education Research International (Vol. 2023).
https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8940114
Young, B. (2016). Including patients in core outcome set development: Issues to consider based on three
workshops with around 100 international delegates. In Research Involvement and Engagement
(Vol. 2, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0039-6
Yuan, M. (2021). Research on intelligent workshop resource scheduling method based on improved NSGAII algorithm. In Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (Vol. 71).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102141
Zappitelli, M. (2017). Developing a neonatal acute kidney injury research definition: A report from the
NIDDK neonatal AKI workshop. In Pediatric Research (Vol. 82, Issue 4, pp. 569–573).
https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.136
Zeisel, M. B. (2015). Towards an HBV cure: State-of-the-art and unresolved questions-report of the ANRS
workshop on HBV cure. In Gut (Vol. 64, Issue 8, pp. 1314–1326). https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl2014-308943
Zhang, X. G. (2019). The effects of school-based training on the innovative ability of young nursing teachers
in the higher vocational college. In Chinese Journal of Nursing Education (Vol. 16, Issue 7, pp. 497–
500). https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2019.07.004
Zhang, Z. (2024). Overcoming Low Teaching Self-efficacy of English as a Foreign Language Teachers in
Secondary Vocational Schools. In Journal of Curriculum and Teaching (Vol. 13, Issue 1, pp. 36–47).
https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v13n1p36
Zhou, B. (2021). A novel knowledge graph-based optimization approach for resource allocation in discrete
manufacturing workshops. In Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing (Vol. 71).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102160
Zlokovic, B. V. (2020). Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): A report from
the 2018 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke Workshop. In Alzheimer’s and Dementia (Vol. 16, Issue 12, pp. 1714–1733).
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12157
Zou, W. Q. (2020). An effective discrete artificial bee colony algorithm for multi-AGVs dispatching problem
in a matrix manufacturing workshop. In Expert Systems with Applications (Vol. 161).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113675

106
JIPDIMAS: Journal of Innovation and Development of Community Service Results | 92-106