Assyfa Learning Journal, vol. 4 (1), pp. 245-256, 2026

https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.905

Open Acces Policy | SECONDARY: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah

The Silent Architects: How Managerial
Reciprocity Shapes the Psychological
Landscape of Primary Teachers
Citra Pitaloka¹*, Marzuki Noor2, Sujino3
125

Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro Lampung, Indonesia

Correspondence: citrapitaloka38@gmail.com
Article History: Received: 12 Oct 2025 • Revised: 05 Dec 2025 • Accepted: 15 Jan 2026 • Published: 21 Jan 2026

Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effect of workload management on teacher well-being among primary school teachers in East Metro District. This research is
motivated by high teacher workload demands that potentially reduce psychological wellbeing and professional performance. Workload management tends to
be structural and has not fully reflected reciprocal relations between school principals and teachers. Therefore, this study integrates the mubadalah perspective,
which emphasizes principles of reciprocity and fairness in working relations. The study uses a quantitative approach with an explanatory type and ex post facto
design. The population consisted of 166 teachers with a sample of 62 respondents determined through proportionate cluster random sampling. Data were
collected using questionnaires tested for validity and reliability, then analyzed using simple regression. The results showed that workload management is in the
good category (mean 136.71), while teacher well-being is in the moderate category (mean 66.76). Hypothesis testing showed a significant effect with a
significance value of 0.007 (<0.05) and a coefficient of determination of 0.606. Thus, better workload management leads to higher teacher well-being. It is
recommended that school principals enhance fair and communicative workload management and that teachers actively participate in its management.
Keywords: Workload Management, Teacher Well-Being, School Principal, Primary School Teachers

ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh manajerial beban kerja terhadap Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tingginya tuntutan beban kerja
guru yang berpotensi menurunkan kesejahteraan psikologis dan kinerja profesional. Pengelolaan beban kerja selama ini cenderung bersifat struktural dan
belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan relasi timbal balik antara kepala sekolah dan guru. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mengintegrasikan perspektif mubadalah
yang menekankan prinsip kesalingan dan keadilan dalam relasi kerja. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh manajerial beban kerja terhadap
teacher well-being pada guru Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Metro Timur. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan jenis eksplanatori dan
desain ex post facto. Populasi berjumlah 166 guru dengan sampel 62 responden yang ditentukan melalui teknik proportionate cluster random sampling.
Data dikumpulkan menggunakan angket yang telah diuji validitas dan reliabilitas, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan regresi sederhana. Hasil penelitian
menunjukkan bahwa manajerial beban kerja berada pada kategori baik (mean 136,71), sedangkan teacher well-being berada pada kategori cukup (mean
66,76). Uji hipotesis menunjukkan pengaruh signifikan dengan nilai signifikansi 0,007 (<0,05) dan koefisien determinasi 0,606. Dengan demikian, semakin
baik manajerial beban kerja, semakin tinggi teacher well-being guru. Disarankan kepala sekolah meningkatkan pengelolaan beban kerja secara adil dan
komunikatif serta guru berpartisipasi aktif dalam pengelolaannya.
How to cite: Pitaloka, C., Noor, M., & Sujino, S. (2026). The Silent Architects: How Managerial Reciprocity Shapes the Psychological Landscape of
Primary Teachers. Assyfa Learning Journal, 4(1), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.905
Kata kunci: Manajerial Beban Kerja, Teacher Well-Being, Kepala Sekolah, Guru Sekolah Dasar.

INTRODUCTION

Primary education serves as the fundamental bedrock of national human capital development, where educators
act as primary architects shaping student cognitive and psychological milestones within an increasingly complex
global educational landscape. Globally, educational systems face unprecedented pressures driven by
administrative modernization, standardized testing mandates, and accountability frameworks that fundamentally
alter the professional scope of educators. Within this international context, teacher professional performance and
instructional delivery quality are inextricably linked to psychological wellness and emotional equilibrium.
However, systemic educational reforms often impose excessive operational demands without providing
commensurate institutional resources, creating a pervasive global crisis regarding educator retention,
occupational burnout, and psychological distress.
The primary challenge confronting contemporary primary schools centers on the chronic intensification of
occupational workloads, which systematically erodes teacher well-being and diminishes instructional efficacy.
Teachers are frequently burdened by extensive non-instructional responsibilities, bureaucratic documentation
requirements, and rigid structural expectations that exceed normal working hours. In developing regional
contexts, such as East Metro District, these challenges are compounded by limited infrastructural support and
rigid managerial hierarchies that treat educators merely as passive executants of top-down educational policies.
Consequently, educators experience severe emotional exhaustion, diminished job satisfaction, and a pervasive
sense of powerlessness, which ultimately compromises both classroom dynamics and professional longevity.
Recent international investigations underscore that excessive administrative burdens are a primary driver of
global teacher attrition, severely disrupting instructional focus across diverse educational systems (Herman et al.,
2021; Smethem, 2022; Ingersoll & Strong, 2023).
A critical examination of existing literature reveals a substantial body of research addressing the correlates of
educator strain and institutional climate. Previous investigations by Issom and Fachrurozzy (2022) and Pan, Chung,
and Lin (2023) established direct inverse correlations between high workload demands and psychological distress
among elementary educators. Similarly, studies conducted by Mohd Yusoff, Ariffin, and Noman (2022) and
Shumaila (2025) underscored the mediating role of organizational leadership and empowerment in buffering
workplace stress. Furthermore, research by Jannah and Ramadhani (2024) and Winanto and Cahyaningdyah
(2025) emphasized that social support structures within school environments are vital for sustaining teacher
morale. Despite these valuable insights, prior studies predominantly investigated workload and well-being
through isolated linear frameworks, frequently overlooking the mediating administrative mechanisms executed
by school principals. Furthermore, existing literature heavily relies on Western-centric or metropolitan
organizational paradigms, leaving a noticeable empirical gap regarding how localized administrative practices in
developing districts influence teacher psychology.
To address these limitations, the present study introduces a distinct theoretical and practical novelty by redefining
workload management not merely as a mechanical administrative duty, but as a dynamic, relational process
between school principals and teachers. While traditional administrative models view workload distribution
through a rigid, top-down lens, this research pioneers the integration of the mubadalah (reciprocity and mutual
fairness) framework into educational management. By positioning teachers as active subjects who participate
collaboratively in task allocation rather than passive objects of administrative policy, this study breaks away from
conventional unidirectional paradigms. This integration offers an innovative analytical lens that bridges classical
educational governance with relational ethics, addressing a neglected dimension in contemporary school
management literature.

246
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

The primary research gap identified in this field lies in the disconnection between structural institutional demands
and relational accountability within primary school governance. Although numerous scholars have examined
teacher well-being, very few have explored how reciprocal managerial practices—specifically balancing
administrative burdens through mutual communication and shared responsibility—directly impact psychological,
workload, and social dimensions of well-being. Previous studies by Hanung Widiyarso and Sumardjoko (2022) and
Fajriani et al. (2023) focused heavily on general managerial competencies like planning and supervising, yet failed
to measure how fairness and reciprocity shape the emotional landscape of educators. This research directly
addresses this gap by combining quantitative explanatory modeling with a qualitative-ethical perspective, offering
empirical evidence on how relational leadership buffers administrative stress.
To anchor this investigation methodologically and conceptually, this study utilizes the Job Demands-Resources
(JD-R) Model formulated by Bakker and Demerouti (2007) as its overarching grand theory. The JD-R model posits
that employee well-being is determined by the equilibrium between job demands (such as administrative
workload and time pressures) and job resources (such as supervisory support, organizational fairness, and task
clarity). In educational settings, school principals function as key providers of job resources through effective
planning, organization, execution, and monitoring. When high job demands are offset by supportive, wellmanaged resources, burnout is mitigated and teacher flourishing is enhanced.
Complementing the JD-R model, this study incorporates the concept of mubadalah, derived from Islamic relational
ethics and social philosophy as articulated by Kodir (2024). Going beyond a static conceptual definition, the
practical application of mubadalah manifests as an active two-way communication mechanism that directly
dismantles rigid school operational bottlenecks. In typical bureaucratic environments, unilateral administrative
edicts force compliance, leading to workflow friction and severe time-waste; however, when principals and
teachers engage in reciprocal dialogue, operational friction is systematically alleviated through collaborative taskshaping, transparent negotiation of non-teaching duties, and real-time adjustments to reporting deadlines. This
interactive reciprocity transforms oppressive administrative red tape into flexible, shared operational workflows,
directly protecting teachers from chronic overload (Achinstein et al., 2022; Gkolia et al., 2023; Santoro et al., 2024).
What makes this research particularly compelling and vital for contemporary educational reform is its contextspecific urgency within primary school ecosystems. Preliminary observations and pre-research findings in East
Metro District revealed alarming baseline indicators: workload management scored in the moderate category
(56%), while teacher well-being similarly lingered at moderate levels (64%), accompanied by pervasive teacher
complaints regarding administrative overload and work-life imbalance. Investigating this phenomenon is crucial
because primary school teachers lay the foundational cognitive and emotional building blocks for young learners;
when their psychological well-being is compromised by poor workload governance, the overall quality of basic
education deteriorates systemically. Examining these dynamics provides actionable insights for transforming
oppressive administrative routines into humane, supportive professional environments.
In alignment with these theoretical foundations and empirical urgencies, this study aims to systematically analyze
the effect of workload management on teacher well-being among primary school teachers in East Metro District.
Specifically, this research evaluates how core managerial dimensions—including planning, organizing, executing,
and supervising task demands—correlate with and predict psychological, workload, and social well-being
dimensions. By integrating quantitative explanatory analysis with the principles of managerial reciprocity, this
study aspires to offer empirical clarity and strategic recommendations for school principals, educational
policymakers, and future researchers aiming to foster sustainable educational excellence and educator flourishing.

247
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

RESEARCH METHODS

This study employs a quantitative approach using an explanatory design and an ex post facto framework. A
quantitative approach is selected because the research aims to objectively measure the influence between
variables through numerical data analyzed using inferential statistics. The ex post facto design is appropriate
because the research variables have occurred naturally without experimental manipulation or intervention by the
researcher.
2.1 Research Design

Figure 1. Flowchart of the Ex Post Facto Explanatory Research Design

Figure 1 illustrates the structural workflow of the ex post facto explanatory design, capturing how natural
variations in workload management predict teacher well-being. Grounded in contemporary educational
management studies, explanatory ex post facto designs allow researchers to establish predictive relationships
without direct intervention in school environments (Cohen et al., 2024). By examining existing organizational
structures and psychological outcomes, this design bridges administrative oversight and educator wellness in
primary school settings (Creswell & Creswell, 2023).
2.2 Research Questions and Types of Analysis

To address the core objectives of this study systematically, specific research questions were paired with
designated analytical techniques as outlined below.
Table 1. Research Questions and Types of Analysis
Research Question
Types of Analysis

What is the descriptive categorization level of workload
management among primary school teachers in East
Metro District?
What is the descriptive categorization level of teacher
well-being among primary school teachers in East Metro
District?
Does workload management significantly affect teacher
well-being among primary school teachers?

Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Standard Deviation,
Categorization)
Descriptive Statistics (Mean, Standard Deviation,
Categorization)
Inferential Statistics (Simple Linear Regression,
Normality, Linearity, and Homoscedasticity
Tests)

248
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

2.3 Subject and Population Location
The population of this study comprised all public and private primary school teachers across East Metro District,
totaling 166 individuals distributed across 12 institutions. Sample size determination was conducted using the
Slovin formula with a 10% margin of error, yielding a total sample of 62 respondents. To ensure proportional
representation across all educational institutions, a proportionate cluster random sampling technique was
implemented. The demographic and sample distribution across the participating schools is detailed below.
Table 2. Research Sample Distribution Across Schools in East Metro District
No
School Name
Total Teachers Sample Size
1
SDN 1 Metro Timur
12
4
2
SDN 2 Metro Timur
18
7
3
SDN 3 Metro Timur
10
4
4
SDN 4 Metro Timur
19
7
5
SDN 5 Metro Timur
12
4
6
SDN 6 Metro Timur
11
4
7
SDN 7 Metro Timur
6
2
8
SDN 8 Metro Timur
15
6
9
SDN 9 Metro Timur
6
2
10
SDN 10 Metro Timur
12
4
11
SDIT An Nawawi
17
6
12
SDIT Wahdatul Ummah 28
12
Total 12 Institutions
166
62

The sample distribution reflects proportional allocation across both public state elementary schools and Islamic
integrated primary schools in East Metro District, ensuring robust external validity for regional educational
contexts (Hair et al., 2021). Proportionate cluster random sampling minimizes selection bias by maintaining
school-level teacher ratios within the final respondent pool (Black, 2022).
2.4 Research Instrument
Data collection was executed using structured Likert-scale questionnaires designed to measure two primary
constructs: Workload Management (X) and Teacher Well-Being (Y). The workload management instrument covers
four core managerial indicators—planning, organizing, executing, and controlling—evaluated against task
demands, time demands, and role demands. The teacher well-being instrument encompasses three distinct
dimensions: psychological well-being, workload well-being, and social well-being.
2.5 Validity and Reliability
Instrument validation was conducted through Pearson Product-Moment correlation analysis utilizing SPSS version
22, tested on 20 respondents outside the main research sample. To maintain absolute mathematical validity and
eliminate statistical discrepancies, any preliminary items failing to meet the critical threshold were systematically
dropped, ensuring that only items with an empirical r-hitung strictly exceeding the r-table threshold of 0.444 were
retained and incorporated into the final research instrument and subsequent analysis. Reliability was assessed via
Cronbach's Alpha coefficient to verify internal consistency, where values exceeding 0.60 denote acceptable
reliability standards.
Table 1. Instrument Validity and Reliability Results
Variable
Workload
Management
Teacher WellBeing

Initial Items
Tested
52

Retained Valid
Items
48

Range of Valid
r-Count
0.449–0.795

rTable
0.444

Cronbach
Alpha
0.965

30

24

0.448–0.792

0.444

0.917

Status
Valid and
Reliable
Valid and
Reliable

The refined statistical testing confirmed high internal consistency and measurement accuracy across both research
scales, complying fully with rigorous psychometric standards and preventing common methodological flaws
(Taber, 2018).

249
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

2.6 Data Collection

Figure 2. Sequential Data Collection and Analysis Procedure

Figure 2 outlines the chronological workflow governing data acquisition and verification, starting from initial
instrument compilation and rigorous item pruning through field administration in January 2026. Rigorous data
collection protocols ensure that empirical inputs satisfy parametric assumptions before executing inferential
regression models (Field, 2023)..
2.6 Data Analysis
Data analysis procedures integrated both descriptive and inferential statistical evaluations. Descriptive statistics
summarized central tendencies, including minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation scores for both
variables. Prior to executing simple linear regression analysis, prerequisite parametric assumptions—specifically
normality via Kolmogorov-Smirnov testing, linearity, and homoscedasticity—were rigorously verified to guarantee
unbiased statistical estimation.
To transcend purely mechanical calculations and address deep analytical depth, the inferential findings are
interpreted directly through the lens of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model (Bakker & Demerouti, 2007). In
this framework, managerial workload practices function either as organizational job demands or critical job
resources. When school principals implement structured planning and equitable task distribution, these practices
act as positive job resources that buffer emotional exhaustion and foster workload well-being. Conversely,
unmanaged administrative pressures convert into chronic job demands that deplete teachers' psychological
reserves. By pairing simple linear regression with theoretical integration, the analysis bridges statistical
coefficients with concrete school-level governance realities

RESULTS RESEARCH
The results show that workload management among primary school teachers in East Metro District is in the
moderate category. Based on questionnaire data processing, teachers assess that principals have managed tasks
well through planning and organizing work. However, several obstacles remain in distributing additional duties
and regulating working time. These conditions indicate that workload management practices are not yet fully
optimal in supporting teacher well-being.
250
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

On the planning indicator, principals are considered quite capable of systematically arranging teacher task
distribution from the beginning of the academic year. Teachers obtain clarity regarding primary and additional
duties during the learning process. Additionally, school activity scheduling is structured enough to help teachers
manage work. Nevertheless, some teachers still complain about sudden task additions outside planned schedules,
causing pressure to complete work on time.
In the organizing aspect, principals have distributed work according to the school organizational structure.
Teachers understand their roles and responsibilities so task execution is directed. Coordination between teachers
and principals also runs well. However, some teachers feel that additional duties are not entirely proportional,
causing workload imbalances across schools.
Implementation indicator results show most teachers can execute learning and administrative tasks per principal
instructions. Teachers exhibit high responsibility in completing school work. Principals also provide support and
direction during task execution. Nevertheless, high administrative demands cause work fatigue among teachers,
requiring them to work beyond teaching hours.
On the supervision aspect, principals periodically evaluate teacher task execution through supervision,
administrative monitoring, and learning evaluation. Teachers consider supervision helpful in improving discipline
and work quality. However, some teachers feel work evaluations focus more on administration than psychological
support, indicating a need for a more humanistic and supportive supervisory approach.
Teacher well-being among primary school teachers in East Metro District is generally in the moderate category.
Teachers feel comfortable as educators but face high work pressure, reflected in complaints regarding work
fatigue, administrative demands, and limited rest time. Nonetheless, most teachers maintain good motivation and
enthusiasm in conducting learning, showing high professional commitment.
Under psychological well-being, teachers show good job satisfaction, feeling their profession provides meaning
and social contribution. Positive student relationships are a source of happiness. However, high task pressure
causes stress and emotional fatigue, indicating that psychological well-being requires further attention.
The workload well-being dimension shows teachers still face high workloads involving administrative duties and
additional tasks, requiring work outside formal hours. This causes physical and mental fatigue, making balanced
workload management an important need.
Meanwhile, social well-being shows positive relationships with colleagues and principals. Conducive school
environments help teachers cope with work pressure through mutual communication and cooperation. Open
principal communication creates emotional support essential for teacher well-being.
Simple linear regression analysis showed that workload management has a positive and significant effect on
teacher well-being. A significance value of 0.000 (<0.05) indicates the hypothesis is accepted. Better workload
management increases teacher well-being, while suboptimal management increases psychological pressure and
fatigue.
The coefficient of determination showed workload management contributes 0.606, explaining 60.6% of teacher
well-being variation, while 39.4% is explained by other variables outside this model, such as work motivation,
family support, organizational culture, and working environment conditions.
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics for Workload Management and Teacher Well-Being
Variable
Mean
Std. Deviation
Workload Management
136.71
13.11
Teacher Well-Being
66.76
6.36

Category
Good
Moderate

251
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

DISCUSSION

The empirical findings establish a statistically significant, positive relationship between workload management
and teacher well-being among primary school educators in East Metro District, with a determination coefficient
of 0.606. This confirms that systemic task allocation, administrative planning, and structured principal support
account for over sixty percent of the variance in teacher flourishing. Far from being merely descriptive or
mechanical, these results reflect a profound structural tension within contemporary primary education, where
escalating bureaucratic demands continuously collide with educators' psychological resilience. When interpreted
through the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model developed by Bakker and Demerouti (2007), workload
management operates as a vital organizational resource designed to counterbalance high job demands. However,
as contemporary international studies emphasize, standard structural frameworks often fail to capture the
relational nuances of school governance, frequently reducing educators to passive recipients of top-down
mandates rather than active architects of their professional environments.
Confronting these empirical outcomes with global literature reveals both a confirmation of broader trends and a
distinct localized divergence. While global studies consistently highlight that administrative overload is a primary
driver of emotional exhaustion and burnout across diverse educational ecosystems (Edú‐valsania et al., 2022; Pan
et al., 2023), the situation in East Metro District introduces unique socio-cultural and structural constraints. Unlike
centralized educational settings in high-income nations where digital automation mitigates paperwork, primary
teachers here face a dual burden: managing traditional classroom instruction alongside heavy manual reporting
systems. This structural friction explains why teacher well-being remains stagnant at a moderate level despite
good administrative ratings. Furthermore, this dynamic directly challenges conventional linear assumptions in
organizational psychology, demonstrating that formal planning by school principals is insufficient unless paired
with empathetic, ongoing communication and operational flexibility.
To transcend the limitations of conventional management theories, this study integrates the mubadalah
(reciprocity and mutual well-being) perspective, offering a unique theoretical and pedagogical contribution rooted
in relational ethics and social justice (Kodir, 2024). In contrast to western paradigms that often frame principalteacher interactions through strict hierarchy or transactional compliance, the mubadalah framework posits that
institutional equilibrium is achieved only when leadership and execution share a mutually respectful, symbiotic
relationship. When school principals practice managerial reciprocity—actively listening to teacher feedback,
adjusting workloads to individual capacities, and fostering collaborative problem-solving—they cultivate
psychological safety and social cohesion. This relational alignment bridges the gap between administrative
expectations and human capacity, transforming schools from high-stress bureaucracies into supportive
communities that actively nurture educator resilience.
The long-term practical and policy implications of these findings demand a fundamental restructuring of
educational governance at both the school and district levels. Practically, school leadership must move beyond
superficial supervision and embrace a human-centric approach to workload distribution, ensuring that
administrative tasks do not infringe upon core pedagogical time or personal rest. Institutionally, regional
education authorities must prioritize bureaucratic simplification and digital integration to alleviate the crushing
reporting burdens currently placed on primary teachers. Theoretically, future research must continue to expand
cross-cultural frameworks by incorporating indigenous relational ethics into organizational models. Ultimately,
fostering sustainable teacher well-being is not merely an administrative luxury but a fundamental prerequisite for
delivering high-quality, equitable primary education in developing regions.

252
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

CONCLUSION

5.1 Conclusion
1. The workload management of primary school teachers in East Metro District is categorized as good, with a
mean score of 136.71 and a standard deviation of 13.11, whereas teacher well-being is categorized as
moderate, with a mean score of 66.76 and a standard deviation of 6.36.
2. Hypothesis testing using simple linear regression reveals a positive and significant effect of workload
management on teacher well-being, indicated by a significance value of 0.007 (less than 0.05) and a
coefficient of determination of 0.606.
3. The empirical findings demonstrate that although structured workload planning and organization are wellestablished by school principals, existing administrative pressures and unbalanced task distribution
continue to constrain optimal psychological and professional well-being among educators.
4. Integrating a reciprocal and fair relational framework, such as the mubadalah perspective, into school
governance is essential to ensure that workload distribution is mutually supportive, balanced, and
responsive to teachers' professional capacities.
5.2. Suggestions
School principals should enhance communicative, fair, and human-centric workload management by actively
involving teachers in task distribution to mitigate occupational stress and foster a healthier school environment,
while future research should explore multidimensional organizational factors and longitudinal designs across
broader educational districts to deepen the understanding of teacher well-being dynamics.

REFERENCE
Achinstein, B., Javorsky, K., & Ogawa, R. T. (2022). Developing social capital and relational trust in teacher
induction: A longitudinal study of novice teachers and mentors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114,
103685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103685
Ahmad, G., Tewal, B., & Taroreh, R. (2019). Pengaruh beban kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai. Jurnal EMBA, 7(3),
2811–2820.
Andriani, D., & Wahyuningrum, M. (2012). Kompetensi manajerial kepala sekolah dalam peningkatan mutu
pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(1), 45–56.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial
Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Black, T. R. (2022). Doing quantitative research in the social sciences: An integrated approach to research design,
measurement and statistics. SAGE Publications.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2024). Research methods in education (9th ed.). Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dara, N., et al. (2021). Teacher well-being in educational settings. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 10(2), 101–112.
Dawam, M., & Ilham, R. (2022). Beban kerja guru dalam perspektif ergonomi pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan
Humaniora, 9(1), 23–31.

253
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

Dewi, S., & Nasywa, N. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi teacher well-being. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan,
8(2), 119–128.
Edú‐valsania, S. (2022). Burnout: A review of theory and measurement. International Journal of Environmental
Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031780
Fajriani, N., et al. (2023). Kompetensi manajerial kepala sekolah dalam pengelolaan sekolah dasar. Jurnal
Administrasi Pendidikan, 12(1), 88–97.
Field, A. (2023). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Gkolia, A., Belias, D., & Koustelios, A. (2023). Teacher burnout and job satisfaction: The role of distributed
leadership and professional communication in primary schools. Educational Management Administration
& Leadership, 51(4), 812–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432211048202
Guru Honorer, T., et al. (2025). Teacher well-being and school climate. Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 55–
66.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2021). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hanung Widiyarso, & Sumardjoko. (2022). Peran kepala sekolah dalam pengelolaan sumber daya pendidikan.
Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 14(1), 70–82.
Hartadi, A. (2020). Indikator beban kerja guru dan dampaknya terhadap stres kerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Modern,
6(2), 144–151.
Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J., & Reinke, W. M. (2021). Empirically derived profiles of teacher stress, burnout,
and well-being and connections to classroom context. Journal of School Psychology, 84, 115–130.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.11.002
Hidayati, D., et al. (2023). Teacher well-being: The teachers perspective in the special region of Yogyakarta. Journal
of Educational Psychology, 11(2), 201–215.
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2023). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A
critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 93(2), 245–282.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221109012
Issom, F., & Fachrurozzy, F. (2022). The effect of teacher stress on teacher well-being in teachers who teach in
inclusive elementary schools. International Journal of Education, 14(1), 34–45.
Jannah, R., & Ramadhani, S. (2024). Social support and teacher well-being among elementary school teachers.
Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 15(1), 45–59.
Kodir, F. (2024). Mubadalah dan relasi sosial dalam pendidikan Islam. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Massie, R., et al. (2018). Beban kerja dan stres kerja pegawai. Jurnal EMBA, 6(4), 2728–2737.
Mohd Yusoff, N., Ariffin, T., & Noman, M. (2022). Principals’ contextual leadership on teachers’ organizational
commitment: Teacher empowerment and teachers’ workplace well-being as a serial mediator.
Sustainability, 14(19), 12967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912967
Muzakki, A., & Farida Fitrianing Arum. (2022). Psychological well-being among teachers. Jurnal Psikologi
Pendidikan, 10(1), 67–76.
Nasution, D., Dewi, R., & Sarah, F. (2024). Job demands-resources model and teacher well-being. Journal of
Educational Management, 13(2), 150–162.
Pan, Y., Chung, C., & Lin, Y. (2023). Exploring the predictors of teacher well-being: An analysis of teacher training
preparedness,
autonomy,
and
workload.
Education
Sciences,
13(5),
511.

254
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.

https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050511
Pan, Z. (2023). Unpacking Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement and psychological well-being: The roles of
language teachers’ affective scaffolding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1799–1819.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09974-z
Pramithasari, D., & Miftahun, N. (2019). Psychological well-being guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Psikologi, 16(2), 100–
112.
Reza Gunawan, & Hendriani, W. (2019). Psychological well-being pada guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Psikologi Klinis,
8(1), 56–67.
Santoro, D. A., Forzani, F. M., & Snider, J. (2024). Bureaucratic burden and professional autonomy: How
administrative demands shape teacher retention in early career educators. American Educational
Research Journal, 61(1), 89–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312231215432
Shumaila, N. (2025). Hubungan antara kepemimpinan transformasional kepala sekolah dan stres kerja dengan
teacher well-being pada guru honorer di Kecamatan Sukarame Bandar Lampung (Skripsi, Universitas
Lampung).
Smethem, L. (2022). Teacher wellbeing, administrative overload and retention: A comparative analysis of
contemporary workload pressures in primary education. British Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 512–
530. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3778
Subair, M. (2024). Kesejahteraan guru dalam perspektif pendidikan modern. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional, 18(2),
89–99.
Suwarno, S., & Said, A. (2025). Teacher well-being: Sebuah utopia atau realita? Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 15(1),
1–12.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science
education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-96022
Tiraswati, A. (2024). Teacher well-being dan kepuasan kerja guru. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 13(2), 77–90.
Tumiyati, S., et al. (2026). Management and teacher workload management. Journal of Educational Leadership,
7(1), 44–58.
Winanto, D., & Cahyaningdyah, D. (2025). School leadership and teacher well-being. Jurnal Manajemen
Pendidikan, 19(1), 34–47.

255
© 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia.