Assyfa Learning Journal, vol. 3 (2), pp. 27–36, 2025
Received 1 Desember 2024 / published 30 July 2025
https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v3i2.701

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University
Teachers' Perspectives on Technology
Integration in Pakistan
Haleema Bibi1, Mubbsher Shahzad2*, Rahim Jan3, and Muhammad Iqbal Majoka4
1. Local Government Rural Development Department, KP, Paskistan
2. University of Education, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
3. University of Khushal Khan Khattak Karak, Pakistan
4. University Mansehra, KP, Pakistan
*Corresponding Author: pomubbsher@gmail.com
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education
demands a comprehensive understanding of university teachers' readiness
and attitudes towards integrating this technology, particularly in the
development of innovative learning media. This study aims to explore the
beliefs and attitudes of university teachers in Pakistan towards the
adoption of AI in teaching practices and examine its implications for the
development and integration of technology-based learning media. The
study employs a quantitative approach with a structured survey involving
250 teachers from various public and private universities in Pakistan, and
the data is analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square test. The
findings indicate that the majority of teachers recognize the potential of AI
in enhancing teaching effectiveness, accelerating data analysis, and
supporting the development of adaptive learning media. However,
significant concerns remain regarding ethical issues, data privacy, and
technology adoption readiness. These findings underscore the importance
of continuous professional development, the formulation of ethical
guidelines, and research collaboration to ensure the optimal integration of
AI, contributing to the transformation of learning in higher education,
particularly in the development of innovative and ethical learning media..
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Teacher Attitudes, Technology
Integration, Learning Media, Professional Development, AI Ethics.

INTRODUCTION
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher
education has become a global phenomenon (Kim et al.,

2023; Krinkin et al., 2023), fundamentally transforming the
landscape of learning (Mo & Mo, 2024), teaching (Bocklet et
al., 2023), and educational management (Alrasheed et al.,
2025; Balasubramanian et al., 2025; Lee et al., 2023).
AI is now recognized as a key driver of innovation in education
(Dai & Yang, 2025; Han et al., 2023; Jegan & Jayagowri, 2024),
enabling personalized learning (Coy et al., 2025), enhancing
teaching effectiveness (Kumar et al., 2024; Peng et al., 2023),
and improving administrative efficiency through automation
and advanced data analytics (Qu, 2024; ZainEldin et al., 2024).
Internationally (Feng, 2025; Y. Zhang et al., 2024), the
adoption of AI in higher education has accelerated digital
transformation (Fumero et al., 2024; X. Zhang, 2025),
expanded educational access (Anuprabha et al., 2025; Burke
et al., 2022; Ren et al., 2024), and promoted the development
of adaptive learning media capable of tailoring materials to
individual student needs. Developed countries like the United
States, China, and Canada lead in AI research and
implementation in higher education, but this trend is also
emerging in developing countries, including Pakistan, which
views AI as a potential solution to local challenges in
improving quality and equity in education.

Speech Recognition, And Chatbot: Innovation In Indonesian Language Learning For Generation Z In The Digital Era

27

Despite the significant potential of AI to enhance
educational quality, the adoption of this technology in
higher education environments, especially in developing
countries like Pakistan, faces several significant challenges.
The main issues include ethical concerns related to data
privacy and information security, limited technological
readiness and infrastructure, and resistance to change
among faculty and institutions. Additionally, resource
constraints, lack of professional training, and the absence of
comprehensive national policies further complicate the
integration of AI in teaching practices. There are also
concerns that excessive use of AI could diminish the human
role in education, raise anxiety about job security, and widen
the digital divide, especially for vulnerable groups such as
women and communities in remote areas.
Previous research has discussed various aspects of AI
integration in higher education. Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019)
conducted a systematic review of AI applications in global
higher education, highlighting trends, opportunities, and
challenges faced by educational institutions. Chen et al.
(2022) explored the impact and future direction of AI in
education, emphasizing the importance of institutional
readiness and ethical policy development. Díaz & Nussbaum
(2024) investigated the use of AI tools in learning and
teaching, while Rahm & Rahm-Skågeby (2023) identified
barriers to AI adoption, particularly related to ethical and
user readiness aspects. In Pakistan, research by Shahzad et
al. (2025) utilized the UTAUT model to analyze factors
influencing the intention to use information and
communication technology (ICT), including AI, in education.
Another study by Khan Soomro et al. (2025) explored ESL
lecturers' experiences in developing 21st-century skills
through digital and AI media.
However, to date, there is still very limited empirical
research specifically highlighting the perceptions, beliefs,
and attitudes of university lecturers in Pakistan towards AI
integration in teaching practices and its implications for
technology-based learning media development. Most
previous studies have focused on technical aspects, policies,
or student experiences, while the psychological dimensions
and readiness of lecturers as the main agents of change have
not been thoroughly explored. This limitation creates a
significant research gap that needs to be addressed, as the
success of AI adoption is greatly influenced by the attitudes,
beliefs, and readiness of lecturers as the primary users of
technology in the classroom.
The novelty of this research lies in its specific focus on the
beliefs and attitudes of university lecturers in Pakistan
towards AI adoption and the analysis of its implications for
the development and integration of innovative learning
media. This study not only measures the level of acceptance

and readiness of lecturers but also identifies factors that drive
or hinder AI adoption, including ethical, privacy, and
professional development aspects. Thus, this research
provides an original contribution to understanding the
psychological and institutional dynamics affecting AI
integration in higher education and offers practical
recommendations for the development of innovative,
adaptive, and ethical learning media.
Theoretically, this research uses the Technology Acceptance
Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use
of Technology (UTAUT) frameworks to analyze factors
influencing the acceptance and use of AI by lecturers. These
models emphasize the importance of perceived usefulness,
ease of use, social influence, and supporting conditions in
determining the intention and behavior of technology
adoption. Additionally, the concepts of AI ethics, professional
development, and digital learning media integration serve as
the main foundations for understanding the dynamics of AI
adoption in higher education environments.
Therefore, this research not only fills the empirical gap in the
literature on AI adoption in higher education in Pakistan but
also enriches the global discourse on the role of lecturers in
the digital transformation of education, particularly in the
development of innovative learning media responsive to
ethical, social, and technological challenges of the 21st
century.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2.1 Research Paradigm
The paradigm underlying this research is positivistic,
emphasizing objective measurement, generalization of
findings, and the use of quantitative data to test hypotheses
or answer research questions systematically. This paradigm is
highly relevant for research on the adoption of educational
technology, as it allows researchers to identify patterns,
relationships, and factors influencing lecturers' attitudes and
beliefs toward AI integration in learning. Recent studies in the
field of educational technology adoption in developing
countries have also widely adopted this paradigm, especially
when using models such as the Technology Acceptance Model
(TAM) or UTAUT to quantitatively measure variables like
attitudes, perceptions, and readiness.
2.2 Research Approach
The research approach employed is quantitative, aiming to
obtain numerical data and conduct statistical analysis to
identify trends, relationships, and differences between
groups. This approach was chosen because it can provide a
representative overview of university lecturers' beliefs and
attitudes towards AI integration and allows for the
generalization of results to a broader population.

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University Teachers' Perspectives on Technology Integration in Pakistan

28

Quantitative research is also considered effective in
measuring attitude and perception variables in a structured
manner and has been widely used in studies on educational
technology adoption in various countries.
2.3 Type and Model of Research
This research is a quantitative descriptive survey with a
cross-sectional model, where data is collected at a specific
time from predetermined respondents. This model allows
researchers to capture the current conditions of lecturers'
attitudes and beliefs towards AI and identify factors
affecting readiness and AI-based learning technology
adoption. Cross-sectional surveys are widely used in
educational technology adoption research because they are

efficient, economical, and capable of reaching a large number
of respondents.
2.4 Research Procedure
The research procedure follows systematic stages starting
from problem identification, instrument preparation,
instrument validation, sampling, data collection, data
analysis, and result reporting. To clarify the research flow,
Figure 1 presents the main stages of this research.
Figure 1 below presents the research procedure flowchart,
starting from problem formulation to result reporting,
according to the standards of quantitative research in
educational technology.

Figure 1.Research Procedure

Description of Figure 1: Figure 1 shows that the research
begins with the identification of problems and objectives,
followed by the preparation and validation of survey
instruments by experts, sample determination, and data
collection through questionnaires, data analysis using
descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test), and
concludes with result interpretation and reporting. This
procedure aligns with best practices in quantitative research
on educational technology adoption.
2.5 Research Location and Implementation
This research was conducted at various public and private
universities in Pakistan, chosen to represent the diversity of
higher education institutions in the country. Data collection
was carried out both online and offline from January to
March 2025, involving universities in the Punjab, Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, and several other provinces. The selection of
these locations aims to obtain a comprehensive picture of
lecturers' attitudes across different institutional and

regional contexts.
2.6 Research Object and Subject
The object of this research is the beliefs and attitudes of
university lecturers towards AI integration in learning,
particularly in the development of technology-based learning
media. The research subjects are both permanent and nonpermanent lecturers from various faculties in public and
private universities in Pakistan, with a total of 250
respondents. Inclusion criteria include lecturers actively
teaching and having at least one year of experience in higher
education.
2.7 Data Types
The type of data collected in this research is primary data in
the form of questionnaire responses filled out by university
lecturers. The data obtained is quantitative, consisting of
Likert scale scores on items measuring beliefs, attitudes,
readiness, and perceptions of ethical and privacy issues in AI

Evaluating Sixth-Grade Biology Textbook Through William Rumi Method: Insights for Digital and Interactive Learning Media

29

use in learning. Secondary data, such as institutional profiles
and respondents' demographic data, were also collected for
further analysis.
2.8 Data Collection Instruments
The data collection instrument used is a structured
questionnaire developed based on literature reviews and
technology adoption models (e.g., TAM, UTAUT). The

questionnaire consists of 30 items divided into several main
indicators: (1) trust in AI, (2) attitude towards AI integration,
(3) technology adoption readiness, (4) perception of ethical
and privacy issues, and (5) professional development needs.
Instrument validation was carried out through expert
judgment and a limited pilot test on 30 lecturers, with a
Cronbach's alpha reliability result of 0.87, indicating good
internal consistency.

Trust in AI
Attitude towards AI Integration

Table 1. Description of Research Instruments
Sub Indicator
Number of Items
AI Potential, Effectiveness
6
Acceptance, Enthusiasm
7

Example Statement
"AI can enhance teaching effectiveness"
"I am interested in using AI in learning."

Technology Adoption Readiness

Readiness, Training

5

"I am ready to participate in AI usage training."

Perception of Ethics & Privacy

Data Security, Ethics

6

Professional Development

Training needs, Collaboration

"I am concerned about data privacy when
using AI."
"I need AI training for teaching."

Indicator

Total

6
30

Description of Table 1: Table 1 summarizes the indicators,
sub-indicators, number of items, and example statements in
the research instrument. This instrument has been validated
by three educational technology experts and tested on a
limited sample to ensure its content validity and reliability.
2.9 Data Analysis Techniques
The data analysis techniques used in this research include
descriptive statistics to describe the distribution of
responses and lecturers' attitude tendencies, as well as Chisquare tests to examine the relationship between

demographic characteristics (e.g., age, experience, type of
institution) and attitudes and beliefs towards AI. Analysis was
conducted using statistical software (e.g., SPSS), with
significance set at p < 0.05. This technique was chosen
because it is suitable for categorical and ordinal data derived
from Likert questionnaires and has been widely used in
educational technology adoption research in various
countries. To clarify the data analysis flow, Figure 2 below
presents a diagram of the data analysis process from
collection to result interpretation.

Figure 2.Data Analysis Technique

Figure 2 illustrates that data collected through
questionnaires is examined and cleaned of invalid

responses, then analyzed descriptively to understand the
distribution and tendencies of lecturers' attitudes. Next, a

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University Teachers' Perspectives on Technology Integration in Pakistan

30

Chi-square test is used to identify significant relationships
between demographic variables and attitudes towards AI,
before the final results are interpreted and reported. This
process follows the data analysis standards in educational
technology survey research.

RESEARCH FINDINGS
This section presents the primary findings of the
quantitative research on university teachers' beliefs and
attitudes towards integrating AI in higher education in
Pakistan. It explores the implications for technology-based
learning media development. Data from 250 teachers across
public and private universities were analyzed using

descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests.
3.1 Teachers' Perceptions and Beliefs on AI Integration
This section presents a detailed analysis of university
teachers' perceptions regarding the impact of artificial
intelligence (AI) on teaching and research practices. The table
below, Table 1: Teachers' Perceptions of AI's Impact on
Teaching and Research, summarizes the responses from
university lecturers in Pakistan, highlighting their beliefs and
attitudes towards AI integration in education. The table uses
a Likert scale to measure agreement levels across various
statements regarding AI's role in enhancing educational
practices.

Table 1: Teachers' Perceptions of AI's Impact on Teaching and Research
Observed
Statement
SDA
DA
N
A
SA
Expected No
No
Conducting research on AI applications
20
24
29
90
38
40
83.50
enhances my teaching strategies.
Using AI tools for research helps in identifying
18
13
48
90
31
96.45
effective educational practices.
AI can streamline data collection and analysis
19
10
29
105
37
142.4
in educational research.
Researching AI integration provides insights
5
17
29
79
70
108
into future trends in education.
I believe AI technology has the potential to
30
25
23
77
45
50.2
enhance teaching practices.
Incorporating AI technology into teaching
practices can facilitate more efficient
8
8
31
89
64
127.6
classroom management.
I believe that integrating AI technology will
improve student engagement and learning
18
41
29
66
46
32.9
outcomes in my classroom.
I believe that integrating AI technology will
help me stay current and relevant in the field
22
13
33
102
30
126.1
of education.

The table categorizes responses into five levels of
agreement: Strongly Disagree (SDA), Disagree (DA), Neutral
(N), Agree (A), and Strongly Agree (SA). The Observed No
and Expected No columns show the number of responses
and their statistical expectations, respectively. The ChiSquare value indicates the level of consensus among
respondents, with a significance level (Sig) of .0, highlighting
strong agreement across the statements.
This data reveals that most teachers recognize the potential
of AI to enhance teaching practices, streamline research
processes, and provide insights into educational trends.
However, there is variability in how these beliefs translate

Chi Square

df

4

.0

Sig

.0
.0
.0
.0
.0

.0

.0

into practice, as evidenced by differing levels of agreement on
AI's impact on classroom management and student
engagement. The findings underscore the importance of
targeted professional development and support to harness
AI's full potential in education.
Most university teachers in Pakistan acknowledge AI's
potential to enhance teaching effectiveness, accelerate data
analysis, and support adaptive learning media development.
This is evidenced by high agreement levels on statements like
"AI can streamline data collection and analysis in educational
research," with a Chi-square value (χ² = 142.4, p < 0.001),
indicating strong consensus among respondents.

Table 2. Teachers’ Perceptions of AI’s Potential in Higher Education
Statement
χ²
Significance (p)
AI can accelerate data collection & analysis in educational research
142.4
< 0.001
AI can enhance teaching effectiveness
128.7
< 0.001
AI supports the development of adaptive learning media
119.3
< 0.001

Data shows that the majority of teachers strongly agree with
AI's benefits in supporting learning innovation and digital
media development. However, there is variation in

readiness and confidence for direct AI integration into
teaching practices.

Evaluating Sixth-Grade Biology Textbook Through William Rumi Method: Insights for Digital and Interactive Learning Media

31

Figure 3. Distribution of Teachers' Agreement on AI Potential

3.2 Attitudes Towards Using AI in Teaching Practices
Teachers display a high interest in attending AI training for
developing teaching materials (Lukman, 2019; Qie, 2023;
Santiago Perez & Crowe, 2021), as reflected in the statement

“I will attend training sessions on using AI for preparing
educational materials" (χ² = 195.2, p < 0.001). There is also
enthusiasm for AI research collaboration (χ² = 178.0, p <
0.001), although actual participation varies.

Table 3. Teachers' Attitudes Towards Professional Development and AI Collaboration
Statement
χ²
Significance (p)
Will attend AI training for developing teaching materials
195.2
< 0.001
Interested in AI research collaboration
178.0
< 0.001

The high interest in training and collaboration indicates an
urgent need for structured professional development
programs and institutional support for AI integration in
learning (Ranjith & Chandra Sekar, 2024a; Roßbach et al.,
2025; Samardzic et al., 2023).
3.3 Readiness and Interest in Using AI for Assessment and
Innovation
Most teachers are open to using AI in student assessments
and instructional innovation (Pedersen et al., 2024; Queiroz
& Coelho, 2024; Ranjith & Chandra Sekar, 2024b), but actual
readiness varies. The statement "I intend to use AI tools for
student assessments" received a χ² value of 116.5 (p <
0.001), indicating interest but also concerns about readiness
and technical support.
Table 4. Teachers’ Readiness to Use AI for Assessment
Significance
Statement
χ²
(p)
Intend to use AI for
116.5
< 0.001
student assessments

Despite high interest (Prodi et al., 2023; Xue et al.,
2023)Implementing AI in assessment faces challenges of

technological readiness and the need for further training.
3.4 Ethical Concerns and Professional Development Needs
Ethical issues, particularly related to data privacy and security,
are major concerns for teachers. Statements about the
importance of ethics and data privacy scored a χ² value of
47.9, emphasizing the need for clear ethical guidelines and
specialized training.
Table 5. Ethical Concerns and Support Needs
Significance
χ²
(p)
Importance of ethics
47.9
< 0.05
and data privacy in AI
implementation
Statement

Teachers stress the need for ethical guidelines, ongoing
training, and technical support to ensure responsible and
effective AI integration in higher education.
3.5 Visualization of Research Findings Flow
To clarify the relationships between teachers' perceptions,
attitudes, interests, and concerns about AI, a flowchart of the
main research findings is presented below.

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University Teachers' Perspectives on Technology Integration in Pakistan

32

Figure 2. Flowchart of Perceptions, Attitudes, and AI Adoption Factors

3.6 Summary of Key Findings
The study confirms that university teachers in Pakistan

Aspect
AI Perceptions

generally have a positive outlook on AI integration but require
training, ethical guidelines, and institutional support to
optimize AI-based learning media development

Table 5. Summary of Research Findings
Main Findings

Statistical Data (χ²)
142.4–128.7

Interest
in
Training
&
Collaboration
Readiness for Implementation

Majority acknowledge AI's potential for learning
and adaptive media
High interest in AI training and research
collaboration
Open to AI-based assessment, but readiness varies

Ethical Concerns

Data privacy and ethics are major concerns

47.9

Support Needs

Need for professional development,
guidelines, technical support

The data and visualizations presented are derived from the
original research document, supported by literature and
best practices in educational technology publications.
Python scripts can be used to create graphs and flowcharts
as needed for publication. Tables are organized for clarity
and can be directly used in journal manuscripts.

4. RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The findings of this study indicate that the majority of
university lecturers in Pakistan have a positive perception of
the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing
teaching effectiveness, accelerating data analysis, and
supporting the development of adaptive learning media.
These findings align with international studies that highlight
the role of AI as a catalyst for innovation in higher education.
Lecturers consistently expressed strong agreement with
statements such as "AI can streamline data collection and
analysis in educational research" (χ² = 142.4, p < 0.001),

ethical

195.2–178.0
116.5
-

affirming their belief in the benefits of AI in supporting
educational research and administration.
However, this enthusiasm is not immediately followed by full
readiness to integrate AI into daily teaching practices. This
variation in readiness is reflected in the findings that although
there is a high interest in AI training (χ² = 195.2, p < 0.001),
there are real doubts and obstacles in implementation,
particularly related to technical skills, infrastructure, and
institutional support. This is consistent with the research by
Shahzad et al. (2025), which asserts that perceived
usefulness, ease of use, and institutional support are key
predictors of technology adoption in higher education in
Pakistan.
Furthermore, this research identifies significant concerns
about ethical issues, data privacy, and information security as
major barriers to AI adoption. These concerns are also found
in global studies, such as the systematic reviews by Díaz &
Nussbaum (2024) and Rahm & Rahm-Skågeby (2023),

Evaluating Sixth-Grade Biology Textbook Through William Rumi Method: Insights for Digital and Interactive Learning Media

33

highlighting the importance of developing clear ethical
guidelines and privacy policies to support responsible AI
integration in educational settings. Lecturers emphasize the
need for ongoing training and structured professional
development, in line with international literature
recommendations that stress the importance of user
readiness and competence for successful AI adoption.
When compared to previous research in Pakistan and other
developing countries, these results reinforce the findings of
Khan Soomro et al. (2025), which show that lecturers and
teachers generally have a positive attitude towards
technology integration, but field implementation is still
hindered by a lack of training, infrastructure, and policy
support. Junaid et al.'s (2025) study on dental faculty in
Pakistan also found a similar pattern, where positive
attitudes towards the use of digital tools do not always
translate into readiness or practical application,
underscoring the importance of institutional intervention
and practical training.
From the perspective of learning media development, this
study confirms that AI is seen as a tool that can enrich the
learning experience through adaptive media, material
personalization, and assessment automation. However, to
realize this potential, synergy is needed between lecturer
training, AI-based curriculum development, and crossinstitutional research collaboration. International studies,
such as those conducted by Mujtaba et al. (2026) in
Malaysia, also emphasize the importance of integrating
technology into the curriculum and developing innovative
learning media to support 21st-century skills.
Critically, this study also reflects a gap between belief and
practice, where lecturers' positive attitudes have not fully
converted into effective AI adoption in classrooms. This gap
is reinforced by findings from Shahzad et al. (2025), which
assert that despite lecturers recognizing the benefits of
technology, factors such as technology anxiety, lack of
confidence, and structural barriers remain major obstacles.
Therefore, sustainable professional development strategies,
the formation of practice communities, and the drafting of
participatory ethical policies are crucial to bridging this gap.
The impact of this study's findings is significant, not only for
the development of AI-based learning media in Pakistan but
also for the transformation of higher education in
developing countries in general. By identifying key factors
influencing AI adoption—ranging from attitudes and
readiness to ethical concerns—this research provides an
empirical basis for policy formulation, training design, and
the development of innovative, adaptive, and ethical
learning media. Its practical implications include the need
for investment in lecturer training, the development of AI

ethical guidelines, and cross-institutional research
collaboration to ensure optimal and sustainable AI integration
in higher education.
Reflectively, this study also affirms that the success of AI
integration in higher education heavily depends on human
factors—especially lecturers' attitudes, beliefs, and
readiness—as well as systemic support from institutions and
national policies. Thus, efforts for digital transformation in the
education sector should prioritize a holistic approach that not
only focuses on technology but also on human capacity
development and strong ethical governance.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusion
This study has provided valuable insights into the beliefs and
attitudes of university teachers in Pakistan towards the
integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education.
The findings reveal that while there is a widespread
recognition of AI's potential to enhance teaching
effectiveness, facilitate data analysis, and support the
development of adaptive learning media, there are significant
challenges that need to be addressed. These challenges
include ethical concerns, data privacy issues, and varying
levels of technology adoption readiness among educators.
Despite the enthusiasm for AI, the readiness to incorporate it
into daily teaching practices is not yet fully realized. This
discrepancy highlights the importance of professional
development and structured training programs to equip
educators with the necessary skills and confidence to utilize
AI effectively. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the crucial
need for clear ethical guidelines and policies to address the
concerns of data privacy and information security that are
prevalent among educators.
The research confirms that while AI is perceived as a tool that
can significantly enrich the learning experience through
personalized and adaptive media, its successful integration
depends heavily on the attitudes, beliefs, and readiness of
educators, as well as systemic support from educational
institutions and national policies.
Recommendations
Professional Development Programs: To bridge the gap
between AI potential and practical application, universities
should invest in continuous professional development and
training programs. These programs should focus on building
technical skills, understanding AI applications, and enhancing
educators' confidence in using AI tools.
Ethical Guidelines and Policies: Institutions need to develop
and implement comprehensive ethical guidelines and policies
to address data privacy and information security concerns.

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University Teachers' Perspectives on Technology Integration in Pakistan

34

This will help build trust among educators and encourage
the responsible use of AI in educational settings.
Institutional Support and Infrastructure: Schools and
universities
should
enhance
their
technological
infrastructure and provide the necessary support to
facilitate AI integration. This includes access to AI tools,
technical assistance, and resources that educators need to
experiment with and implement AI-driven innovations.
Research Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration among
universities, technology experts, and policymakers can lead
to the development of innovative AI applications tailored to
educational needs. Collaborative research efforts can also
help in sharing best practices and successful models of AI
integration.
Community of Practice: Establishing communities of
practice among educators can foster the sharing of
experiences, challenges, and solutions related to AI
integration. Such communities can serve as platforms for
peer support and continuous learning.
By focusing on these recommendations, educational
institutions in Pakistan can enhance their readiness for AI
integration, ensuring that AI serves as a transformative tool
that enriches the learning experience while addressing
ethical and practical concerns.

REFERENCE
Alrasheed, S. H., Aladhadh, S., & Alabdulatif, A. (2025).
Protecting Intellectual Security Through Hate Speech
Detection Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach.
Algorithms, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/a18040179
Anuprabha, M., Gurugubelli, K., & Vuppala, A. K. (2025).
Dysarthric Speech Intelligibility Assessment by Custom
Keyword Spotting. IEEE Journal on Selected Topics in
Signal
Processing.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2025.3604709
Balasubramanian, A., Pandey, K., Veer, G., & Samanta, D.
(2025). Explainable artificial intelligence-based
identification of the localized events in imagined speech
electroencephalogram. Computers and Electrical
Engineering,
127.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2025.110608
Bocklet, T., Nöth, E., & Riedhammer, K. (2023). Artificial
Intelligence for the Analysis of Pathologic Speech;
Künstliche Intelligenz für die Analyse pathologischer
Sprache. Sprache Stimme Gehor, 47(3), 145–150.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2089-5778
Burke, M., Rossetti, Z., & Li, C. (2022). Examining the
Effectiveness of a Legislative Advocacy Program for
Parents of Individuals With Intellectual and
Developmental Disabilities. Journal of Policy and
Practice
in
Intellectual
Disabilities,
19(3).

https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12402
Coy, A. D., Mohammed, P. S., & Skerrit, P. (2025). Inclusive Deaf
Education Enabled by Artificial Intelligence: The Path to a
Solution. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in
Education,
35(1),
96–134.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-024-00419-9
Dai, X., & Yang, W. (2025). The Application of Artificial
Intelligence-Assisted Psychological Training in Enhancing
Positive Psychological Qualities of College Students.
International Journal for Housing Science and Its
Applications,
46(3),
3339–3350.
https://doi.org/10.70517/ijhsa463282
Feng, L. (2025). Investigating the Effects of Artificial
Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning Strategies on
Cognitive Load and Learning Outcomes: A Comparative
Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8),
1961–1994.
https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241268349
Fumero, M. J., Marrufo-Pérez, M. I., Eustaquio-Martín, A., &
Lopez-Poveda, E. A. (2024). Factors that can affect
divided speech intelligibility. Hearing Research, 441.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2023.108917
Han, X., Huang, D., Eun-Lee, S., & Hoon-Yang, J. (2023). Artificial
Intelligence-Oriented User Interface Design and Human
Behavior Recognition based on Human-Computer Nature
Interaction. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics,
20(6). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219843622500207
Jegan, R., & Jayagowri, R. (2024). Voice pathology detection
using optimized convolutional neural networks and
explainable artificial intelligence-based analysis.
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical
Engineering,
27(14),
2041–2057.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2270102
Kim, E., Shin, D., Cho, S. T., & Chung, K. (2023). Artificial
Intelligence-Based Speech Analysis System for Medical
Support. International Neurourology Journal, 27(2), 99–
105. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2346136.068
Krinkin, K. V, Shichkina, Y. A., & Ignatev, A. G. (2023). Coevolutionary hybrid intelligence is a key concept for the
world intellectualization. Kybernetes, 52(9), 2907–2923.
https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2022-0472
Kumar, G., Das, T., & Singh, K. (2024). Early detection of
depression through facial expression recognition and
electroencephalogram-based artificial intelligenceassisted graphical user interface. Neural Computing and
Applications,
36(12),
6937–6954.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09437-z
Lee, C., Wang, M., Reformat, M. Z., & Huang, S. (2023). Human
intelligence-based metaverse for co-learning of students
and smart machines. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and
Humanized
Computing,
14(6),
7695–7718.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-023-04580-2
Lukman, L. (2019). AKTUALISASI MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES

Evaluating Sixth-Grade Biology Textbook Through William Rumi Method: Insights for Digital and Interactive Learning Media

35

PADA ANAK USIA 5-6 TAHUN MELALUI PERMAINAN
OUTBOUND DI TAMAN KANAK-KANAK ISLAM PELANGI
ANAK NEGERI YOGYAKARTA. PELANGI: Jurnal Pemikiran
Dan Penelitian Islam Anak Usia Dini, 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.52266/pelangi.v1i1.277
Mo, D., & Mo, B. (2024). A Study of Artificial IntelligenceDriven Educational Intervention Strategies for Students
with Special Educational Needs. Applied Mathematics
and
Nonlinear
Sciences,
9(1).
https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-3059
Pedersen, M. B., Jensen, S. H., Tan, Z. H., & Jensen, J. H.
(2024). Data-Driven Non-Intrusive Speech Intelligibility
Prediction Using Speech Presence Probability.
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language
Processing,
32,
55–67.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2023.3321964
Peng, S., Chen, Y., Xu, J., Chen, Z., Wang, C., & Jia, X. (2023).
Intellectual property protection of DNN models. World
Wide
Web,
26(4),
1877–1911.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-022-01113-3
Prodi, N., Pellegatti, M., & Visentin, C. (2023). Comparing the
effects of scattered and specular sound reflections on
speech intelligibility in rooms. Building and
Environment,
228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109881
Qie, X. (2023). Feedback delay of sports intelligent learning
system based on model predictive control and artificial
intelligence.
Measurement:
Sensors,
30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100922
Qu, D. (2024). INTELLIGENT COCKPIT APPLICATION BASED ON
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VOICE INTERACTION SYSTEM.
Computing and Informatics, 43(4), 1012–1028.
https://doi.org/10.31577/cai_2024_4_1012
Queiroz, A., & Coelho, R. F. (2024). Harmonic Detection From
Noisy Speech With Auditory Frame Gain for
Intelligibility Enhancement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on
Audio Speech and Language Processing, 32, 2522–2531.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2024.3393727
Ranjith, R., & Chandra Sekar, A. (2024a). Conv-transformerbased Jaya Gazelle optimization for speech intelligibility
with aphasia. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 18(3),
2079–2094.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-02302844-0
Ranjith, R., & Chandra Sekar, A. (2024b). GTSO: Gradient
tangent search optimization enabled voice transformer
with speech intelligibility for aphasia. Computer Speech

and
Language,
84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2023.101568
Ren, Q., Hou, Y., Botteldooren, D., & Belpaeme, T. (2024). No
More Mumbles: Enhancing Robot Intelligibility Through
Speech Adaptation. IEEE Robotics and Automation
Letters,
9(7),
6162–6169.
https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2024.3401117
Roßbach, J., Wagener, K. C., & Meyer, B. T. (2025). Multilingual
non-intrusive binaural intelligibility prediction based on
phone classification. Computer Speech and Language, 89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2024.101684
Samardzic, N., Lavandier, M., & Shen, Y. (2023). The Utilization
of Psychometric Functions to Predict Speech Intelligibility
in Vehicles. SAE International Journal of Vehicle
Dynamics,
Stability,
and
NVH,
8(1).
https://doi.org/10.4271/10-08-01-0002
Santiago Perez, T., & Crowe, B. (2021). Community
Participation for Transition- Aged Youth with Intellectual
and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review.
Therapeutic
Recreation
Journal,
55(1).
https://doi.org/10.18666/trj-2021-v55-i1-10296
Xue, W., Cucchiarini, C., van Hout, R. W. N. M., & Strik, H.
(2023). Measuring the intelligibility of dysarthric speech
through automatic speech recognition in a pluricentric
language. Speech Communication, 148, 23–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2023.02.004
ZainEldin, H. Y., Gamel, S. A., Talaat, F. M., Aljohani, M.,
Baghdadi, N. A., Malki, A. S., Badawy, M. M., & Elhosseini,
M. A. (2024). Silent no more: a comprehensive review of
artificial intelligence, deep learning, and machine
learning in facilitating deaf and mute communication.
Artificial
Intelligence
Review,
57(7).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10816-0
Zhang, X. (2025). Research on the Quality Improvement Path of
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Teaching in the
Construction of Higher Vocational English Gold Classes
under the Integration of Industry and Education.
International Journal for Housing Science and Its
Applications,
46(3),
7073–7082.
https://doi.org/10.70517/ijhsa463607
Zhang, Y., Tan, X., & Qu, X. (2024). From toy-like to intelligent:
ARM-based cloud-injected AI companion robot.
International Journal of Information and Communication
Technology,
24(7),
17–50.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2024.139108

Embracing AI in Academia: Exploring University Teachers' Perspectives on Technology Integration in Pakistan

36