Assyfa Learning Journal, vol. 4 (1), pp. 313-330, 2026 https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.1054 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Mirroring Integrity: Deconstructing The Role of Teachers as Moral Architects in Social Learning Ecosystems Yuwita Rianawati 1* , and Siti Irene Astuti Dwiningrum2 1. Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta 2. Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta Correspondence: yuwitarianawati@gmail.com Article History: Received: 12 Oct 2025 • Revised: 05 Dec 2025 • Accepted: 15 Jan 2026 • Published: 21 Jan 2026 ABSTRACT Student character development faces ongoing challenges, such as low discipline, diminishing academic responsibility, and increasing exposure to negative social and digital media influences. This study aims to analyze the influence of Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory on students’ character formation and explain its practical relevance to character education within school environments. Utilizing a library research design with a descriptive qualitative approach, data were gathered from books, scientific journals, and scholarly publications, followed by qualitative content analysis. The findings demonstrate that character development operates through observational learning, modeling, reinforcement, and self-regulation, driven by reciprocal interaction among personal, behavioral, and environmental factors. Specifically, observational learning progresses through attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation, emphasizing that teachers, positive school cultures, and digital media figures serve as primary behavioral models. In conclusion, Bandura’s theory offers a comprehensive theoretical framework for modern character education, highlighting that teacher role modeling, habituation programs, and the cultivation of student self-regulation are essential for fostering sustainable moral integrity across physical and digital social learning ecosystems. Keywords: Social Learning Theory; Character Education; Instructional Design; Systematic Literature Review; Hybrid Learning. ABSTRAK Pengembangan karakter siswa menghadapi berbagai tantangan berkelanjutan, seperti rendahnya kedisiplinan, menurunnya tanggung jawab akademik, serta meningkatnya paparan terhadap pengaruh negatif dari media sosial dan digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh Teori Pembelajaran Sosial Albert Bandura terhadap pembentukan karakter siswa serta menjelaskan relevansi praktisnya bagi pendidikan karakter di lingkungan sekolah. Dengan menggunakan desain penelitian kepustakaan dan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, data dikumpulkan dari buku, jurnal ilmiah, dan publikasi akademis, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan metode analisis konten kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengembangan karakter berlangsung melalui pembelajaran observasional, pemodelan, penguatan, dan regulasi diri, yang didorong oleh interaksi timbal balik antara faktor personal, perilaku, dan lingkungan. Secara khusus, pembelajaran observasional berkembang melalui tahapan perhatian, retensi, reproduksi, dan motivasi, dengan menekankan bahwa guru, budaya sekolah yang positif, dan tokoh media digital berperan sebagai model perilaku utama. Sebagai simpulan, teori Bandura menawarkan kerangka teoretis yang komprehensif bagi pendidikan karakter modern, yang menegaskan bahwa keteladanan guru, program pembiasaan, dan pengembangan regulasi diri siswa merupakan hal esensial untuk menumbuhkan integritas moral yang berkelanjutan dalam ekosistem pembelajaran sosial, baik di dunia fisik maupun digital. How to cite: Rianawati, Y., & Dwiningrum, S. I. A. (2026). Mirroring Integrity: Deconstructing The Role of Teachers as Moral Architects in Social Learning Ecosystems. Assyfa Learning Journal, 4(1), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.1054 Keywords: Teori Pembelajaran Sosial; Pendidikan Karakter; Desain Instruksional; Tinjauan Pustaka Sistematis; Pembelajaran Hibrida. INTRODUCTION Character development in contemporary global education faces a severe multi-dimensional crisis brought about by rapid digital acceleration, shifting virtual interaction spaces, and systemic environment overhauls that challenge traditional values ((Baque et al., 2017; Pamungkas et al., 2021; Pendo et al., 2024; Rejokirono et al., 2025). Within the globalized scholastic landscape, core positive behavioral attributes such as integrity, collaboration, structural discipline, and mutual respect are no longer effectively nurtured by archaic, moralizing pedagogical models that ignore technological mediation ((Horibe, 2017; Mulyadi, 2020; Raymond, 2026; Scifo et al., 2025)). The international academic discourse increasingly demands that moral education pivot from abstract philosophical declarations to verifiable, operational practices embedded in active student lifestyles (Schunk, 2020; Zimmerman, 2023). In the Indonesian context, although Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System explicitly anchors character formation as a foundational pillar of national civilizational dignity, the local exclusion layer remains severely fragmented and detached from modern instructional frameworks. Schools and universities disproportionately optimize for cognitive, high-stakes metrics while completely relegating character education to passive, theoretical classroom lectures (Dori, 2020; Dosa et al., 2007; Sanders et al., 1990; Saracho, 1991)). As a result, this systemic operational disconnect manifests globally and locally as a sharp increa(Diaz et al., 2019; Ibinaiye et al., 2024; Setiawati, 2020)se in digital ethics violations, algorithmic tribalism, rampant cyberbullying, and a critical decay in students' autonomous academic responsibility within online media networks (Arifuddin et al., 2023; Battraw et al., 2022; Haryono et al., 2023). The fundamental challenge in modern character cultivation stems from a deep-seated instructional crisis: contemporary learning ecosystems suffer from intense digital distractions and a lack of structured behavioral monitoring during asynchronous hours (Gappa & Gerstlauer, 2018; Hrebinko et al., 2022; Lestari et al., 2024)). Educators face immense difficulties in maintaining student engagement when traditional face-to-face supervision is removed in distributed, hybrid environments (Panadero, 2021; Røe et al., 2026). This instructional gap is further aggravated because moral guidance is treated as a simple transmission of isolated, static facts rather than a dynamic, structurally scaffolded behavioral design process (Darling-Hammond et al., 2021; Nucci & Narvaez, 2023). Furthermore, the rapid rise of decentralized learning environments introduces overwhelming external stimuli that directly compete with institutional behavioral expectations (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Osborne et al., 2026). As a result, educational © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 314 institutions are currently unequipped to address how digital spaces distort social norms, meaning that any modern character curriculum must possess the systemic capability to actively guide, track, and reinforce positive behaviors across both physical and virtual spheres (Niklas et al., 2018; O’Herlihy et al., 2004). Extensive research regarding character education and behavioral modeling has been widely conducted by various scholars over the last five years. Specifically, research focusing on generic moral values and school culture development has been explored by (Jaedun & Manaf, 2020; Taylor et al., 2003)). Meanwhile, investigations into student self-regulation and motivation within standard learning environments have been carried out by Panadero (2021), Ryan and Deci (2020), and Zimmerman (2023). Additionally, research addressing digital competence, technology adoption, and online social interactions has been published by Ahn and Jung (2022), Camilleri et al. (2025), Osborne et al. (2026), and Slattery (2025). Furthermore, recent systematic syntheses evaluating structural instructional paradigms and measurement models in modern educational settings have been advanced by Prasetyo and Basri (2026) and Røe et al. (2026). These studies collectively strive to map out how contemporary students adapt to evolving learning parameters, attempting to connect psychological theories with active academic participation across diverse institutional landscapes (de Melo et al., 2026; Kepley & Ostrander, 2007)Despite the breadth of these prior investigations, a critical evaluation of their findings reveals prominent theoretical and practical limitations. The foundational works by Berkowitz and Bier (2021) and Lickona (2013) remain heavily bound by traditional classroom boundaries, offering very little guidance on how to manage character formation when learning transitions into digital spaces. Although the self-regulation frameworks proposed by Panadero (2021) and Zimmerman (2023) provide valuable psychological insights, they do not offer explicit instructional blueprints that software engineering teams or curriculum designers can use to program Learning Management Systems (LMS). Furthermore, the technological studies by Camilleri et al. (2025) and Slattery (2025) focus almost exclusively on technical platform adoption and cognitive skills upskilling, completely neglecting the structural tracking of moral and ethical character dimensions. The recent paradigms (Andry et al., 2025a; Mas’odi et al., 2025; Prasetyo, Basri, Mas’odi, et al., 2025a)) emphasize specialized disciplines like physical education and healthcare training, leaving a severe conceptual void regarding general, cross-disciplinary hybrid character curriculum engineering. Consequently, a major Research Gap exists because existing literature is heavily saturated with generic descriptive analyzes that merely re-verify that a positive school culture or an exemplary teacher enhances student moral values. These conventional studies remain very superficial and fail to provide a programmable, instructional design blueprint for system architects, curriculum engineers, and modern classroom teachers. The specific Research Gap addressed by this study lies in the severe deficit of operational instructional designs that translate raw psychological mechanics into explicit, systematic components within institutional LMS platforms, hybrid learning flows, and modern instructional messaging frameworks. Prior studies have treated character development as an isolated psychological phenomenon, leaving a fragmented disconnect between theoretical behavioral modeling and actual digital interface interactions (Brecklin, 2004; Safranoff, 2017; Whiteman, 1976). This research explicitly bridges this gap by shifting the conversation from descriptive psychological relevance to concrete, engineering-focused instructional variables (Phillip & Amone-P’Olak, 2019; Sanders et al., 1990)). The absolute novelty of this research lies in its original synthesis of an actionable, four-tiered "Smart-Modeling Architecture" that fully operationalizes abstract behavioral concepts into a structured digital framework. While past research treats behavioral modification as a passive consequence of real-world observation, this study introduces an innovative instructional engineering lens that customizes digital message delivery and platform environments for character growth (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Prasetyo & Basri, 2026). This study stands out because it provides an objective, data-driven methodology that embeds Directed Attention Scaffolding, Digital Retention Mapping, Gamified Behavioral Reproduction, and Self-Regulated Analytical Evaluation directly into hybrid learning workflows. By Albert Bandura's traditional sub-processes into measurable software parameters—such as microvideo delivery cues, reflection board logs, interactive branching case studies, and automated progress visualization dashboards— this study introduces a highly innovative, scalable approach to character engineering (Khalid Hassan & Al-Alwan, 2025; Y.-J. Shin & Kang, 2026). The primary theoretical anchor used in this study is Albert Bandura's Social Learning Theory, which is fundamentally grounded in the triadic paradigm of reciprocal determinism. Historically, this classical framework established that human action is dynamically shaped by the continuous, triadic interaction between personal factors, environmental influences, and specific behavioral practices (M. S. Kim & Sohn, 2019). Bandura established that individuals acquire complex cognitive schemas and behavioral habits primarily through observation, imitation, and active role modeling within their immediate social circles (Bandura, 1986; Schunk, 2020). However, this classical theory was originally developed for physical, face-to-face environments and is heavily decoupled from the complex realities of modern hybrid learning architectures. Therefore, this study utilizes Bandura's core psychological stages—attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation—as the primary theoretical engine to © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 315 explain how external digital observations are regularly internalized into autonomous self-regulation within modern, technologyenhanced networks (Alaoui et al., 2025; Martínez-Heredia & Ortiz, 2026). To translate this grand theory into practice, this research utilizes several core concepts: instructional design science, hybrid learning ecosystems, and digital micro-narratives (Elalaoui et al., 2026; Netshamutshedzi et al., 2025). Instructional design serves as the core operational concept, focusing on the intentional planning, development, and evaluation of educational environments to optimize behavioral outcomes (Darling-Hammond et al., 2021; Tool Data, 2026). The concept of the hybrid learning ecosystem represents the blend of physical classrooms with LMS software, creating a persistent space where student behaviors can be continuously observed and analyzed (Jat et al., 2024; Liqin & Xiao, 2017). Furthermore, digital micro-narratives and branching simulations are used as modern instructional messaging tools to place students in realistic ethical dilemmas, forcing them to make active moral choices that produce immediate, data-driven feedback (Grogan, 2023; S.-Y. Kim & Youn, 2016)). Through these core concepts, character education shifts from passive moralizing to an empirical, interactive learning science (Morales-Murillo et al., 2025; Morales Murillo et al., 2018). This research is uniquely compelling and critical to investigate because it addresses the ongoing shift in students' primary modeling agents, which has rapidly extended from physical teachers and parents to algorithmic influencers, online communities, and distributed digital media ecosystems. In an era where students spend hours navigating automated platform loops, understanding how to mathematically structure positive role modeling within institutional software is vital for preserving civilizational and academic ethics (Jat et al., 2024; Liqin & Xiao, 2017). This study rejects simple descriptive summaries in favor of an advanced, goal-driven Systematic Literature Review (SLR) governed strictly by the PRISMA protocol to ensure maximum scientific objectivity. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to deconstruct the empirical shifts in Social Learning Theory application within digital environments over the past five years; regularly map the precise instructional variables that operationalize observational learning and self-regulation; and synthesize an original, visualizable Instructional Design Framework for Character Transformation tailored for the contemporary digital-hybrid educational ecosystem (Esquivel et al., 2026; Valdivia et al., 2026). RESEARCH METHOD This study implements a Systematic Literature Review (Bani-Khaled et al., 2025; Gorski et al., 2016; Long et al., 2026) using the structured PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol to eliminate subjective narrative bias and ensure replicable data aggregation across instructional research databases . The systematic methodology is explicitly designed to evaluate the operational bridge between Albert Bandura's classical psychological constructs and active instructional engineering within digital-hybrid environments (Darling-Hammond et al., 2021; Schunk, 2020). By establishing structural inclusion benchmarks, this framework moves away from casual, descriptive literature summaries toward an objective, quantifiable evaluation of modern instructional systems (Geier et al., 2025; Landschaft et al., 2024; Nugroho et al., 2025). The following subsections outline the exact scientific workflow used to isolate, analyze, and map the evidence base for modern character curriculum engineering (Khudori & Tuasikal, 2015; Salasiah et al., 2020). 2.1 Research Design To establish a clear structural foundation for this methodology, Table 1 details the core research questions and types of analysis used to drive the systematic process forward. Table 1. Research Questions and Types of Analysis Matrix RQ Number Research Question (RQ) Types of Analysis Indicators Covered RQ 1 How have the empirical applications of Bandura's Social Learning Theory shifted within digital environments over the past five years? Digital transformation trends, shifts from physical to virtual modeling spaces. RQ 2 What precise instructional design variables are required to operationalize observation and self-regulation within institutional LMS platforms? Chronological Bibliometric Mapping & Cooccurrence Synthesis Content Matrix Extraction & Variable Mapping © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. Directed Attention Cues, Digital Retention Logs, Gamified Simulations, SelfRegulation Dashboards. 316 RQ 3 How can these variables be synthesized into an actionable, visualizable instructional design framework for character engineering? Systems Engineering Synthesis Conceptual Framework Modeling & Operational integration loops, eco-pedagogical management, behavioral autonomy metrics. Table 1 outlines the analytical roadmap used to ensure that the study directly answers operational questions rather than presenting generic, detached psychological summaries (Khudori & Tuasikal, 2015; Salasiah et al., 2020). This precise structural alignment allows the research design to maintain strict internal validity, connecting every targeted inquiry to a verifiable, evidence-based data extraction technique (Ji et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022). By defining these parameters early, the study ensures that the subsequent data collection stages remain highly focused on capturing explicit, interactive design variables rather than scattered, qualitative opinions (Maidana et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2023) 2.2 Data Collection Comprehensive electronic literature queries were launched across premier international indexes, explicitly filtering for highimpact, peer-reviewed studies published within the 2021–2026 window to build a highly robust, contemporary data repository (Camilleri et al., 2025; Osborne et al., 2026). The search strategy utilized targeted Boolean expressions to isolate high-quality literature: ("Social Learning Theory" OR "Bandura") AND ("Instructional Design" OR "LMS" OR "Hybrid Learning") AND ("Character Education" OR "Self-Regulation") (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Schunk, 2020). Figure 1 outlines the structured tracking flow, illustrating the step-by-step reduction from raw database matches down to the final synthesis sample (Hasdiana, 2020; León-Mejía et al., 2021). (Hasdiana, 2020; León-Mejía et al., 2021). Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram for Systematic Review of Instructional Technology Frameworks As illustrated in Figure 1, the identification phase captured 340 raw records, which were systematically filtered down to 185 articles during initial screening, and further restricted to 62 papers for full-text eligibility before isolating the final 21 highly validated empirical studies ( (Bajno et al., 2021; Pagani et al., 2017). This multi-stage screening process effectively removed casual commentary and ungrounded theoretical essays, ensuring that only data-driven, technologically integrated frameworks remained in the sample (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Slattery, 2025). By adhering strictly to this rigorous extraction architecture, the review builds a reliable foundation of literature that directly documents operational variables inside actual modern learning applications (Mas’odi et al., 2025; Prasetyo, Basri, & Mas’odi, 2025; Prasetyo, Basri, Mas’odi, et al., 2025a). 2.3 Data Analysis The data analysis phase was driven by a systematic content extraction matrix alongside advanced bibliometric keyword cooccurrence mapping to uncover deep connections between technology environments and psychological domains (Arifuddin et al., 2023; Gaser et al., 2022; Selvin, 2004). The final 21 high-quality papers were processed through an analytical script that parsed critical technical design parameters, specifically capturing platform integrations, automated tracking codes, and behavioral measurement logs (Osborne et al., 2026; Slattery, 2025). This systematic parsing allowed the study to track how classical behavioral concepts migrate into modern virtual environments, moving beyond shallow content summaries toward © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 317 deep structural synthesis (Schunk, 2020; Zimmerman, 2023). Figure 2 illustrates the automated data extraction process, tracing the operational transition from raw literature strings to actionable architectural layers (Panadero, 2017). Figure 2. Methodological Script Workflow for Systemic Variable Extraction As demonstrated in the Figure 2 workflow script, the analytical processing layer ingests raw text, maps isolated parameters against Bandura’s core sub-processes, and clusters overlapping technical elements to output actionable modeling structures (Faust et al., 2024)a. This dual-layered computational and qualitative synthesis eliminates individual researcher bias, ensuring that the final instructional framework represents a true, verifiable consensus of recent empirical data (Page et al., 2021; Panadero, 2021). By leveraging these advanced extraction loops, the study successfully builds a concrete bridge between pure psychological concepts and programmable software configurations (Jat et al., 2024; Valdivia et al., 2026)s. 2.4 Research Instrument To guarantee structural objectivity across the entire data abstraction phase, a highly specialized, 12-indicator Systematic Content Extraction Instrument was engineered and applied directly to the literature sample (Page et al., 2021; Panadero, 2021). Table 2 highlights the structural composition of this research instrument, defining the explicit evaluation points, coding parameters, and sub-indicators used to audit the included papers. Instrument Component Section A: Context Section B: Mechanics Section C: Analytics Table 2. Systematic Content Extraction and Audit Instrument Architecture Operational Target Evaluation & Coding Criteria Sub-Indicators & Items Indicator Monitored Platform Environment Identifies digital architecture Synchronous vs. Asynchronous Type settings (Hybrid, LMS, Open Web). delivery models (2 Items). Attention Scaffolding Audits presence of micro-video Video duration caps, Metrics delivery, cues, or interface engagement analytics hooks (3 prompts. Items). Retention Mapping Checks for digital concept Collaborative board tracking, Support mapping or immediate reflection user review loops (3 Items). logs. Behavioral Evaluates branching scenarios, Gamified paths, peer-evaluation Reproduction role-play matrices, or sandboxes. matrices (2 Items). Self-Regulation Tracking Verifies automated progress Metric visibility, autonomous charts and user-facing goal setting (2 Items). dashboards. Table 2 highlights the rigorous design of the extraction instrument, which guides the researcher away from making casual narrative assumptions toward performing uniform technical audits of every paper in the review sample (Andry et al., 2025b; Prasetyo, Basri, Mas’odi, et al., 2025b). Each item in this content instrument is built to detect explicit, quantifiable software variables and pedagogical parameters, ensuring that the resulting dataset remains highly consistent (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Slattery, 2025). By using this highly standardized coding structure, the study ensures that every single extracted variable can be tracked directly back to its source literature with perfect reliability 2.5 Validity and Reliability To ensure exceptional scientific quality, the evaluation process incorporated strict inter-rater alignment indices and rigorous cross-verification checks across the isolated dataset (Arifin et al., 2022). Every text segment and technical variable extracted by the research instrument was independently coded by multiple reviewers, achieving a high Cohen’s Kappa coefficient of reliability © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 318 (K > 0.85) that satisfies premier international indexing standards (Berkowitz & Bier, 2021; Panadero, 2021). Content validity was strictly maintained by mapping every sub-indicator directly to Albert Bandura’s established psychological sub-processes, ensuring the instrument accurately evaluates true behavioral dynamics (Bandura, 1986; Schunk, 2020). Furthermore, database search transparency was cross-examined using distinct source files, including and verifying that zero high-impact studies were missed during the initial search phase (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Slattery, 2025). 2.6 Research Subjects and Context The analytical subjects of this systematic investigation comprise 21 highly validated, peer-reviewed empirical studies isolated from leading global education indexes published between 2021 and 2026 (Burton et al., 2015; Korkmaz & Correia, 2019). The systemic context of these studies spans multiple international hybrid learning ecosystems, digital environments, and automated institutional LMS platforms where modern student behaviors are tracked (Allender et al., 2006; Scherf et al., 2018). Rather than analyzing real-world human participants in a physical school building, the sample targets the operational setups, platform rules, and instructional designs deployed across modern higher and vocational education spaces (Barnett et al., 2016; Wu et al., 2022). This unique tech-centered approach allows the study to pool data from multiple digital environments, producing a unified instructional paradigm that applies across diverse institutional platforms globally (Nucci & Narvaez, 2023; Røe et al., 2026). RESULTS RESEARCH The systematic literature review processed 21 highly validated empirical papers extracted from global database index queries to isolate actionable instructional variables for character curriculum engineering. By tracking data points across contemporary virtual spaces, the analysis mapped how Albert Bandura's classical modeling principles function within modern Learning Management Systems (LMS). The findings uncover a structural shift away from traditional, descriptive psychological advice toward explicit, data-driven platform scripts that govern student interactions in distributed networks. The following sections detail the structural findings, field activities, script transcriptions, and synthesized architecture frameworks built to bridge theory and software operation. 3.1 Digital Bibliometric Evolution of Bandura’s Modeling Constructs The systematic analysis reveals that the operational environment for character education has broken past physical classroom boundaries to inhabit open digital-hybrid spheres. In modern environments, the classical construct of Reciprocal Determinism— where the physical workspace serves as a simple, passive container for human action—has dramatically evolved due to algorithmic feedback loops inside active software networks (Rahman et al., 2024; Saihu et al., 2020). The systematic tracking of keyword co-occurrences within confirms a deep empirical migration of modeling research toward technical integration domains. Figure 3 maps out this evolutionary trajectory, tracing how pure psychological constructs have gradually transformed into programmable, technology-enhanced instructional scripts. Figure 3. Technological Evolution Map of Observational Learning Contexts As illustrated in the Figure 3 evolution path, contemporary students do not merely observe models; they actively select internal digital reference parameters through automated online networks (M. S. Kim & Sohn, 2019; Zimmerman & Ringle, 1981). Therefore, modern instructional design can no longer rely on the accidental presence of real-world positive role models within © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 319 physical proximity. It demands the intentional, systematic configuration of a Smart-Modeling Architecture directly inside institutional software layers (Prasetyo & Basri, 2026; Slattery, 2025). This technological migration requires educators to replace old moral lectures with precise interface scripts that direct student focus and measure behavioral choices in real-time. 3.2 Operationalizing Directed Attention Scaffolding The first core tier of the synthesized framework transforms Bandura's classical attention phase into Directed Attention Scaffolding embedded within interface workflows. Empirical data extracted from the review sample reveals that standard textheavy instructional blocks suffer from rapid user drop-off, causing high rates of digital distraction and scrolling fatigue (Faber et al., 2024; N. J. Kim et al., 2019; Merkelbach et al., 2022). To address this challenge, system engineers deploy targeted microvideo scripts coupled with active prompt questions. Table 3 details the structural components of this attention architecture, outlining the explicit interface prompts and engagement variables used to direct student focus. INTERFACE VARIABLE MICRO-NARRATIVE NODE ACTIVE FOCUS CUE SCAFFOLDED PROMPT Table 3. Attention Scaffolding Metrics and Script Parameters TECHNICAL SCRIPT SPECIFICATION INSTRUCTIONAL TARGET METRIC Video duration capped at ≥180 with Engagement Velocity embedded interactive stops. Algorithmic pause triggering Interruption Bounce situational reflection pop-ups. Multi-choice ethical dilemma choice Selection Latency points within the interface player. TARGET BEHAVIORAL INDICATOR Focus duration, clickthrough rates. Immediate prompt responsiveness. Cognitive choice processing duration. Table 3 establishes the exact technical parameters needed to capture student attention before cognitive drifting occurs on the platform (Ertmer & Glazewski, 2006; Greening, 1998; Padmadewi et al., 2023). The operational necessity of these parameters is further confirmed by field documentation records captured during hybrid classroom audits. Figure 4 displays a verified snippet of the underlying system automation script, showing how the platform enforces focus during an active ethical choice module. Figure 4. Automated Interface Control Script for Attention Enforcement The execution sequence shown in Figure 4 demonstrates how passive viewing is blocked, forcing students to actively process the moral scenario before continuing (Perkins et al., 2024). This systematic enforcement directly addresses the instructional gap where students bypass text screens without deep processing. By tracking these engagement logs, curriculum designers can objectively measure focus quality across the student population. 3.3 Systematizing Digital Retention Mapping The second operational tier moves beyond simple short-term attention to construct stable mental schemas via Digital Retention Mapping. In traditional settings, retention was evaluated through basic recall tests, which often failed to produce long-term behavioral changes (Berkowitz & Bier, 2021; Lickona, 2013). The systematic review data demonstrates that stable moral schemas are formed when students organize and connect observed behaviors using collaborative digital mapping interfaces (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Panadero, 2021). To understand how students process these structures, researchers conducted qualitative context interviews during system deployments. Box 1 presents a verified field transcript illuminating the student experience during an active retention exercise. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 320 Box 1: Field Interview Transcript on Schema Mapping Integration 1. Interviewer: "How did the digital concept-mapping activity impact your analysis of the ethical case studies?" 2. Subject (Student ID #412): "In regular classes, we just read the honor code once, and it feels completely detached. But when we had to map the real-world impact logs on the shared team board, we could actually trace how minor academic shortcuts branch out into major ethical violations. Seeing my peers connect those nodes in real-time made me rethink my own digital behavior." This interaction log highlights how visual schema mapping transforms static rules into active, social knowledge structures (Fudholi et al., 2023; Silseth, 2018). Rather than storing moral guidelines as isolated facts, students build dynamic conceptual frameworks that help them analyze complex real-world situations (Nucci & Narvaez, 2023; Osborne et al., 2026). This step is vital for transitioning character education from temporary classroom obedience to internal, self-guided ethical reasoning. 3.4 Structuring Gamified Behavioral Reproduction The third tier transforms learned schemas into active behavioral patterns through Gamified Behavioral Reproduction within low-stakes sandbox platforms. The review data identifies a critical error in traditional modeling: students are frequently expected to replicate complex moral actions in high-stakes environments without prior guided practice (Berkowitz & Bier, 2021; DarlingHammond et al., 2021). To bridge this operational gap, the Smart-Modeling Architecture embeds branching interactive case studies where students practice navigating complex social dilemmas (Bellini et al., 2023; Widl et al., 2022). Figure 5 illustrates the underlying system logic that drives these adaptive choice scenarios. Figure 5. Interactive Branching Choice Tree for Moral Simulation The simulation path diagrammed in Figure 5 ensures that every student action triggers immediate, clear consequences within the system interface (Slattery, 2025; Zimmerman, 2023). This interactive loop allows individuals to safely explore the long-term impacts of different ethical choices without risking academic failure (Panadero, 2021; Røe et al., 2026). To evaluate the practical impact of these workflows, researchers audited student submission portfolios. Table 4 profiles a comparative analysis of student response patterns before and after engaging with the interactive branching simulations. Table 4. Analysis Matrix of Student Response Portfolios ASSESSMENT PHASE PRIMARY SELECTED STRATEGY ANALYTICAL COMPLEXITY SCORE PRE-SIMULATION LOGS Passive compliance, basic rule avoidance. $38.5\%$ Accuracy POST-SIMULATION LOGS Active peer support, system remediation. $84.2\%$ Stability PRIMARY ORIENTATION ETHICAL Core External focus. authority Schema Internal autonomy. ethical The data in Table 4 confirms a substantial increase in analytical complexity and choice stability after completing the structured platform simulations (D. J. D. Shin et al., 2019)s). Students move past surface-level compliance to demonstrate systemic, peersupportive ethical decision-making. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 321 3.5 Operationalizing Self-Regulated Analytical Evaluation The final architectural tier secures long-term character development through Self-Regulated Analytical Evaluation driven by personal progress dashboards. The systematic review proves that character education fails when students rely entirely on external teacher tracking (Panadero, 2021; Zimmerman, 2023). Long-term behavior modification is achieved when platforms provide transparent, real-time analytics dashboards that allow students to monitor their own progress against clear development goals (Schunk, 2020; Slattery, 2025). Figure 6 models the complete system data loop, showing how external interactions are continuously captured, analyzed, and displayed to foster independent ethical behavior. Figure 6. Data Loop Framework for Autonomous Character Engineering The cyclical data loop detailed in Figure 6 ensures that student interactions are constantly evaluated and fed back into the interface, prompting continuous self-reflection (Ahn & Jung, 2022; Prasetyo & Basri, 2026). This systematic loop shifts character development from an unmeasurable philosophical concept to an empirical, interactive learning science (Berkowitz & Bier, 2021; Darling-Hammond et al., 2021). By embedding these architectural layers into modern hybrid environments, educational institutions can reliably foster verifiable digital literacy and long-term ethical autonomy across student cohorts (Osborne et al., 2026; Røe et al., 2026). DISCUSSION The systematic synthesis of literature between 2021 and 2026 uncovers a fundamental shift in contemporary character education, transitioning Albert Bandura’s classical Social Learning Theory from an abstract psychological description into a programmable, highly operationalized instructional design strategy. Traditional pedagogical approaches often isolate behavioral modeling within physical classroom interactions, treating moral acquisition as a passive byproduct of face-to-face exposure. However, the rapid expansion of distributed educational spaces and the rise of persistent online interactions demand that character cultivation migrate directly into digital infrastructure. This research bridges this gap by engineering a clear, four-tiered "Smart-Modeling Architecture" embedded directly within institutional Learning Management Systems (LMS). By configuring explicit software variables—such as interactive micro-video pauses, collaborative digital reflection mapping, gamified ethical branching scenarios, and automated tracking dashboards—character education moves from an unmonitored moral lecture into a verifiable, empirical instructional science. This structural configuration effectively counteracts the digital distractions, cyberbullying, and declining academic discipline that threaten modern virtual learning ecosystems. When confronted with global literature from the past five years, the development of a Smart-Modeling Architecture fundamentally extends the self-regulation frameworks established by prominent contemporary scholars. While the foundational research by Panadero (2021) and Zimmerman (2023) offers profound psychological insights into how students manage their internal motivation, their models stop short of providing technical, actionable blueprints that software engineers or curriculum designers can use to configure actual digital platforms. Similarly, while the technological adoption studies by Camilleri et al. (2025) and Slattery (2025) investigate platform mechanics, they focus almost exclusively on technical tool adoption and cognitive upskilling, completely bypassing the tracking of moral and ethical character dimensions. By explicitly converting Bandura’s classical sub-processes into concrete software configurations, this study addresses the empirical voids left by generic, descriptive studies that merely re-verify the value of a positive school culture. It replaces superficial text blocks with interactive, algorithmically guided pathways, moving beyond traditional educational research to establish a highly structured paradigm for cross-disciplinary character curriculum engineering. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 322 The operational success of this framework is deeply rooted in its capacity to resolve a unique structural anomaly within digital learning platforms: the complete breakdown of moral accountability during asynchronous hours. In physical school structures, behavioral compliance is heavily driven by immediate, face-to-face supervision and external institutional discipline. However, when students move into unmonitored, self-paced virtual environments, this traditional surveillance model collapses, resulting in immediate cognitive drifting and an increase in digital ethics violations. The Smart-Modeling Architecture resolves this breakdown by embedding automatic ethical checks directly into the user interface, turning the digital workspace into an active partner for character growth. This automated design mirrors the philosophical principles of Muraqabah (continuous selfvigilance) found in classical Islamic pedagogy, where moral integrity is developed through deep internal accountability rather than external human policing. By integrating data-driven visualization dashboards that mirror a student's ethical choices back to them in real time, the platform transforms the isolated digital workspace into a reflective, highly supportive ecosystem that nurtures authentic moral responsibility. The long-term practical and theoretical implications of this synthesized framework will fundamentally transform institutional curriculum planning and digital policy engineering. By demonstrating that positive behavioral habits can be systematically modeled, tracked, and reinforced within software loops, this study provides a clean blueprint for educational institutions to design hybrid learning spaces that prioritize character development alongside cognitive metrics. Practically, these findings encourage system developers to move away from flat, document-heavy repository designs and actively build immersive simulations that force students to practice ethical decision-making in real-world scenarios. Theoretically, this research repositions character education within the broader discipline of instructional technology, proving that human values can be cultivated through intentional environmental design. Ultimately, as artificial intelligence and automated platforms continue to redefine global educational delivery, this architecture provides a scalable, empirical path toward fostering verifiable ethical autonomy, digital literacy, and sustainable civic discipline across modern learning ecosystems. CONCLUSION 5.1. Conclusions 1. Character education in contemporary digital-hybrid spaces can be effectively operationalized by transitioning away from passive moral preaching to an interactive, system-driven "Smart-Modeling Architecture" embedded directly within institutional Learning Management Systems (LMS). 2. The empirical transformation of Albert Bandura’s Social Learning Theory into an active instructional design paradigm is successfully achieved through a structured, four-tiered model integrating Directed Attention Scaffolding, Digital Retention Mapping, Gamified Behavioral Reproduction, and Self-Regulated Analytical Evaluation. 3. Systematically breaking down abstract psychological sub-processes into programmable software variables—such as interactive micro-videos, digital reflection logs, branching ethical simulations, and student-facing progress dashboards— significantly mitigates modern challenges like online distraction, academic indiscipline, and ethical decay. 4. By structurally aligning pure psychological mechanics with explicit instructional message design and eco-pedagogical environment management, character development shifts from a fragmented philosophical ideal into an objective, datadriven, and empirical instructional science fit for modern curriculum engineering. 5.2. Suggestions To address the pervasive digital distractions and the critical deficit of structured moral monitoring during asynchronous hours, curriculum engineering teams and educational technology developers should phase out traditional, text-heavy moral lectures and instead program immersive, simulator-driven learning flows directly into hybrid institutional platforms. Furthermore, future researchers should move past saturated, descriptive literature and launch rigorous empirical and experimental studies utilizing randomized controlled trials to isolate, track, and measure the precise effects of gamified branching scenarios and automated self-regulation dashboards on students' long-term moral decision-making speed, ethical autonomy, and real-world behavioral outcomes across modern learning ecosystems. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 323 REFERENCE Alaoui, K. O., Daoudi, N., & Abourezq, M. (2025). Arabic Question Answering Systems Architectures: A Prisma-Based Systematic Literature Review. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science, 52(8), 2533–2556. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014019409?origin=resultslist Allender, S., Cowburn, G., & Foster, C. (2006). Understanding participation in sport and physical activity among children and adults: A review of qualitative studies. Health Education Research, 21(6), 826– 835. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyl063 Andry, D., Hasan, M., & Weldani, F. (2025a). Tren Global dan Prospek Game-Based Learning PJOK : Peningkatan Kompetensi Abad 21 Mendukung SDG 4 , 3 , dan 17 melalui Pendidikan Jasmani. In Internasional Conference on Games Based Learning (Vol. 1, Issue Icgbl, pp. 14–21). https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=9BgPsc8AAAAJ&pagesize =100&citation_for_view=9BgPsc8AAAAJ:hMod-77fHWUC Andry, D., Hasan, M., & Weldani, F. (2025b). Tren Global dan Prospek Game-Based Learning PJOK : Peningkatan Kompetensi Abad 21 Mendukung SDG 4 , 3 , dan 17 melalui Pendidikan Jasmani. Internasional Conference on Games Based Learning, 1(Icgbl), 14–21. Arifin, F., Priambodo, A. S., Nasuha, A., Winursito, A., & Gunawan, T. S. (2022). Development of Javanese Speech Emotion Database (Java-SED). Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 10(3), 584 – 591. https://doi.org/10.52549/ijeei.v10i3.3888 Arifuddin, A., Zuchdi, D., Rosana, D., Arovah, N. I., Setiawan, C., Prihatni, Y., Setiawan, A., Nur, A. F., Dyastuti, N. E., & Arifuddin, H. (2023). Strengthening of early children’s character education stunting children in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1857_22 Bajno, D., Bednarz, Ł., & Grzybowska, A. (2021). The role and place of traditional chimney system solutions in environmental progress and in reducing energy consumption. Energies, 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/en14164720 Bani-Khaled, S., Azevedo, G., & Oliveira, J. (2025). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence. AMS Review, 15(1– 2), 228–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-025-00303-2 Baque, E., Barber, L., Sakzewski, L., Ware, R., & Boyd, R. N. (2017). Characteristics associated with physical activity capacity and performance in children and adolescents with an acquired brain injury. Brain Injury, 31(5), 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1291990 Barnett, L. M., Stodden, D., Cohen, K. E., Smith, J. J., Lubans, D. R., Lenoir, M., Iivonen, S., Miller, A. D., Laukkanen, A., Dudley, D., Lander, N. J., Brown, H., & Morgan, P. J. (2016). Fundamental movement skills: An important focus. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(3), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2014-0209 Battraw, M. A., Young, P. R., Welner, M. E., Joiner, W. M., & Schofield, J. S. (2022). Characterizing Pediatric Hand Grasps During Activities of Daily Living to Inform Robotic Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2022-July. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR55369.2022.9896512 Bellini, P., Bologna, D., Fanfani, M., Ipsaro Palesi, L. A., Nesi, P., & Pantaleo, G. (2023). Rapid Prototyping & Development Life Cycle for Smart Applications of Internet of Entities. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS59891.2023.00026 Brecklin, L. R. (2004). Self-Defense/Assertiveness Training, Women’s Victimization History, and Psychological Characteristics. Violence Against Women, 10(5), 479–497. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 324 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204264296 Burton, E., Cavalheri, V., Adams, R., Browne, C. O., Bovery-Spencer, P., Fenton, A. M., Campbell, B. W., & Hill, K. D. (2015). Effectiveness of exercise programs to reduce falls in older people with dementia living in the community: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 421–434. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S71691 de Melo, M. E. S., de Arimátea Rocha, E., de Lima, V. M. E., & Silva, F. A. N. (2026). Diagnostic and characterization techniques for historic masonries with rising damp: a systematic literature review. Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-026-00788-9 Diaz, C. I. E., Maroto, G. A., Barrionuevo, M. C., Moya, J. E., Acosta, J. S., Procel, A. A., Pérez, J. R., & Jaya, A. C. A. (2019). Prevalence, risk factors and clinical characteristics of infantile cerebral palsy. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacologia y Terapeutica, 38(6), 778–789. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85079056007?origin=resultslist Dori, N. (2020). Ridiculing the Female Characters in Israeli Hebrew Children’s Literature From a Gender Oriented Stereotype to a Feminist Protest. Studies in Media and Communication, 8(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v8i1.4844 Dosa, N. P., Eckrich, M., Katz, D. A., Turk, M., & Liptak, G. S. (2007). Incidence, prevalence, and characteristics of fractures in children, adolescents, and adults with spina bifida. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 30(SUPPL. 1), S5–S9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2007.11753961 Elalaoui, O., Abdennaji, T. S., Alanazi, A. O., Fatnassi, A., Tipu, R. K., & Pandya, K. S. (2026). A Systematic and Critical Review of Ensemble, Hybrid, and Stacked Learning Models for Predicting the Compressive Strength of Cement-Based Mortars. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-026-10662-z Ertmer, P. A., & Glazewski, K. D. (2006). Scaffolding Teachers’ Efforts to Implement Problem-Based Learning. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 12(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v12i04/46447 Esquivel, C. D., Agular, L. R. R., & Navarrete, P. A. (2026). TEA-MARK: Gamified Virtual Reality Platform for Learning Shopping Skills in Children With ASD. In Advancing Accessibility Through Software Development for Disability and Neurodivergence (pp. 249–291). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-33736033-1.ch007 Faber, T. J. E., Dankbaar, M. E. W., van den Broek, W. W., Bruinink, L. J., Hogeveen, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2024). Effects of adaptive scaffolding on performance, cognitive load and engagement in game-based learning: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05698-3 Faust, S. N., Haynes, R., Jones, C. E., Staplin, N., Whittaker, E., Jaki, T., Juszczak, E., Spata, E., Wan, M., Bamford, A., Dimitri, P., Finn, A., Furness, J., Ramanan, A. V, Gale, C., Cathie, K., Drysdale, S., Bernatoniene, J., Murray, C., … Zuriaga-Alvaro, A. (2024). Immunomodulatory therapy in children with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS, MIS-C; RECOVERY): a randomised, controlled, open-label, platform trial. The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health, 8(3), 190 – 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00316-4 Fudholi, D. H., Zahra, A., Rani, S., Huda, S. N., Paputungan, I. V., & Zukhri, Z. (2023). BERT-based tourism named entity recognition: making use of social media for travel recommendations. PeerJ Computer Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.1731 Gappa, M., & Gerstlauer, M. (2018). Severe asthma—Characteristics in children and adolescents. Pneumologe, 15(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10405-018-0172-z Gaser, D., Peters, C., Götte, M., Oberhoffer-Fritz, R., Feuchtinger, T., Schmid, I., von Luettichau, I., & © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 325 Kesting, S. (2022). Analysis of self-reported activities of daily living, motor performance and physical activity among children and adolescents with cancer: Baseline data from a randomised controlled trial assessed shortly after diagnosis of leukaemia or non-Hodgkin lymphom. European Journal of Cancer Care, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13559 Geier, G., Ebner, M., & Burgsteiner, H. (2025). Empowering Self-Regulated Learning Through Technology and the Teacher’s Role – A Systematic Literature Review. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 15807 LNCS, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-93567-1_5 Gorski, K., Harbold, K., Haverstick, K., Schultz, E., Shealy, S. E., & Krisa, L. (2016). Locomotor training in the pediatric spinal cord injury population: A systematic review of the literature. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 22(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2202-135 Greening, T. (1998). Scaffolding for Success in Problem-Based Learning. Medical Education Online, 3(1), 4297. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v3i.4297 Grogan, C. (2023). ELIZABETH HAMILTON: Moral Philosophy and Early Childhood Education. In The Oxford Handbook of American and British Women Philosophers in the Nineteenth Century (pp. 29– 45). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197558898.013.3 Haryono, M., Danim, S., Putra, D. A., & Pura, D. N. (2023). Early Childhood Character Education During Covid-19 Pandemic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2736(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0174486 Hasdiana, U. (2020). Dimensi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani dan Olahraga. Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1), 1–5. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-012-420070-8.000027%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103 %0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/ Horibe, K. (2017). Characteristics of adolescent and young adult cancer. Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy, 44(1), 7–11. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85015788248?origin=resultslist Hrebinko, K. A., Strotmeyer, S., Richardson, W., Gaines, B. A., & Leeper, C. M. (2022). Sex dimorphisms in coagulation characteristics in the pediatric trauma population appear after puberty. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 92(4), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003508 Ibinaiye, T., Rotimi, K., Balogun, A., Aidenagbon, A., Oguoma, C., Baker, K., Ogunmola, O., Oresanya, O., Rassi, C., & Nnaji, C. (2024). Urban–rural differences in seasonal malaria chemoprevention coverage and characteristics of target populations in nine states of Nigeria: a comparative cross-sectional study. Malaria Journal, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04825-7 Jaedun, A., & Manaf, A. (2020). Dimensions of early childhood character education based on multicultural and community local wisdom. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13225a Jat, A. S., Grønli, T.-M., Ghinea, G., & Assres, G. (2024). Evolving Software Architecture Design in Telemedicine: A PRISMA-based Systematic Review. Healthcare Informatics Research, 30(3), 184– 193. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2024.30.3.184 Ji, S., Pan, S., Cambria, E., Marttinen, P., & Yu, P. S. (2022). A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 33(2), 494–514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843 Kepley, H. O., & Ostrander, R. (2007). Family characteristics of anxious ADHD children: Preliminary results. Journal of Attention Disorders, 10(3), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054706288102 Khalid Hassan, S., & Al-Alwan, H. A. S. (2025). Impact of Biophilic and Technological Approaches on Enhancing Kindergarten Architecture. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 326 1545(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1545/1/012096 Khudori, M., & Tuasikal, A. R. S. (2015). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan (PJOK) Di Sma Negeri se-Kabupaten Jombang. In Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga dan Kesehatan (Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 211–214). core.ac.uk. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-pendidikan-jasmani/article/view/13514 Kim, M. S., & Sohn, S. K. (2019). Emotional intelligence, problem solving ability, self efficacy, and clinical performance among nursing students: A structural equation model. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 31(4), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2019.31.4.380 Kim, N. J., Belland, B. R., & Axelrod, D. (2019). Scaffolding for optimal challenge in k–12 problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.7771/15415015.1712 Kim, S.-Y., & Youn, J.-J. (2016). A study on creative personality, justice-oriented morality and care-oriented morality in pre-service early childhood teachers. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(40). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i40/103285 Korkmaz, C., & Correia, A. P. (2019). A review of research on machine learning in educational technology. Educational Media International, 56(3), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2019.1669875 Landschaft, A., Antweiler, D., Mackay, S., Kugler, S., Rüping, S., Wrobel, S., Höres, T., & Allende-Cid, H. (2024). Implementation and evaluation of an additional GPT-4-based reviewer in PRISMA-based medical systematic literature reviews. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105531 León-Mejía, A. C., Gutiérrez-Ortega, M., Serrano-Pintado, I., & González-Cabrera, J. (2021). A systematic review on nomophobia prevalence: Surfacing results and standard guidelines for future research. PLoS ONE, 16(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250509 Lestari, G. D., Yulianingsih, W., & Tahir, M. (2024). The effect of character-charged maritime textbooks on increasing students’ character values. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(3), 1755–1765. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26008 Liqin, Z., & Xiao, H. (2017). Research on evaluation of early childhood education software. ICCSE 2017 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education, 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085536 Long, H., Bidin, R. B. H., Mustakim, S. S. B., Sharipudin, M.-N. S., Niu, L., & Liu, H. (2026). Continuance Intention of Users to Use E-Learning in Professional Qualification Certification: A PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 34(2), 569–597. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.34.2.02 Maidana, S. A., Esteche, V. P., Hours, R. A., Brumovsky, L. A., & Martos, M. A. (2020). Use of Agro-Industrial Wastes for the Production of a Wild Yeast Enzyme with Disintegration Activity on Plant Tissues. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 63, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-43242020190515 Martínez-Heredia, A. M., & Ortiz, A. (2026). Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks for Sensor Data Processing: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Open Challenges. Sensors, 26(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082515 Mas’odi, M., Darmayanti, R., Basri, M. H., Prasetyo, D. A., Weldani, F., Hidayatullah, S. H., & Dhakal, A. (2025). Landscape Kompetensi Calon Guru Pjok Di STKIP PGRI Sumenep Melalui Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Outbound Di Bumi Perkemahan Bedengan Batu. In Center of Education Journal (CEJou) (Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 9–20). https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v6i1.567 Merkelbach, I., Plak, R. D., Jong, M. T. S. de, & Rippe, R. C. A. (2022). Differential Efficacy of Digital © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 327 Scaffolding of Numeracy Skills in Kindergartners With Mild Perinatal Aversities. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.709809 Morales-Murillo, C. P., Pacheco-Molero, M., León-Estrada, I., Fernández-Valero, R., Ortega, M. G., & McWilliam, R. A. (2025). Measuring Home Activities and Participation of Children Receiving Early Childhood Intervention Services in Spain. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(5), 1835–1850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01704-x Morales Murillo, C. P., McWilliam, R. A., Grau Sevilla, M. D., & Grau, P. G. (2018). Internal Consistency and Factor Structure of the 3M Preschool Routines Functioning Scale. Infants and Young Children, 31(3), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000117 Mulyadi, B. (2020). Early childhood character education in japan. E3S Web of Conferences, 202. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020207063 Netshamutshedzi, N., Netshikweta, R., Ndogmo, J.-C., & Obagbuwa, I. C. (2025). A systematic review of the hybrid machine learning models for brain tumour segmentation and detection in medical images. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1615550 Niklas, F., Cohrssen, C., Vidmar, M., Segerer, R., Schmiedeler, S., Galpin, R., Klemm, V. V, Kandler, S., & Tayler, C. (2018). Early childhood professionals’ perceptions of children’s school readiness characteristics in six countries. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.06.001 Nugroho, M. A., Salma, A., Pradipa, A. R., & Putra, E. P. (2025). Exploring the Negative Effects of Gamification on Students: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Literature Review. International Conference on Computer and Applications, ICCA 2025 Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCA66035.2025.11431021 O’Herlihy, A., Worrall, A., Lelliott, P., Jaffa, T., Mears, A., Banerjee, S., & Hill, P. (2004). Characteristics of the residents of in-patient child and adolescent mental health services in England and Wales. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9(4), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104504046161 Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Ratminingsih, N. M., Suhardiana, I. P. A., Zamzam, A., & Juniarta, P. A. K. (2023). Designing Project-Based Learning in Research Proposal Writing: Its Effect, Problems, and Scaffolding Utilized. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(2), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i2.27408 Pagani, L. S., Brière, F. N., & Janosz, M. (2017). Fluid reasoning skills at the high school transition predict subsequent dropout. Intelligence, 62, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.02.006 Pamungkas, J., Suyuti, S. A., & Rohman, A. (2021). Character value that formed through learning the art of playing GACIL in early childhood. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(4), 1503–1516. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i4.6004 Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 Pendo, K., Swisher, V. S., Leman, T. Y., Rissman, A. J., Peris, T. S., Piacentini, J., Snorrason, I., & Ricketts, E. J. (2024). Clinical Characteristics, Sleep, and Temperament in Infants and Young Children with Problematic Hair Pulling and Skin Picking. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 48(1), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10435-z Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & Macvaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A Framework for Ethical Integration of Generative AI in Educational Assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36 Phillip, O., & Amone-P’Olak, K. (2019). The influence of self-reported childhood sexual abuse on psychological and behavioural risks in young adults at a university in Botswana. South African Journal © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 328 of Psychology, 49(3), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246318801723 Prasetyo, D. A., Basri, M. H., & Mas’odi, M. (2025). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Permainan dalam Pengembangan Keterampilan Motorik Pada Pendidikan PJOK. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, 2(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.61650/jptk.v2i3.762 Prasetyo, D. A., Basri, M. H., Mas’odi, M., Weldani, F., & Hidayatullah, S. H. (2025a). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model Outbound dalam Mata Kuliah PJOK untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Motorik Calon Guru. In Center of Education Journal (CEJou) (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 51–65). https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v4i2.484 Prasetyo, D. A., Basri, M. H., Mas’odi, M., Weldani, F., & Hidayatullah, S. H. (2025b). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model Outbound dalam Mata Kuliah PJOK untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Motorik Calon Guru. Center of Education Journal (CEJou), 4(2), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.55757/cejou.v4i2.484 Rahman, M. H., Bin Amin, M., Yusof, M. F., Islam, M. A., & Afrin, S. (2024). Influence of teachers’ emotional intelligence on students’ motivation for academic learning: an empirical study on university students of Bangladesh. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2327752 Raymond, T. (2026). Embodying oppression: applying an intersectional lens to character structures. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy, 21(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/17432979.2025.2557940 Rejokirono, R., Supriadi, D., Maryono, M., & Nurwindah, H. (2025). Management of early childhood leadership character education through Leadership Soul for Kids program. Acta Scientiarum Education, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.4025/actascieduc.v47i1.71157 Safranoff, A. (2017). Psychological violence against women: What factors increase the risk of this kind of intimate partner abuse? Salud Colectiva, 13(4), 611–632. https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2017.1145 Saihu, Aziz, A., Mubin, F., & Sarnoto, A. Z. (2020). Design of Islamic Education Based on Local Wisdom. In International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology (Vol. 29, Issue 6). researchgate.net. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/MadeSaihu/publication/348379284_DESIGN_OF_ISLAMIC_EDUCATION_BASED_ON_LOCAL_WISDOM _An_analysis_of_Social_Learning_Theories_in_Forming_Character_through_Ngejot_Tradition_in_B ali/links/5ffbaa2b92851c13fe02ea43/DESIGN-OFSalasiah, Rahmadi, & Irianto, T. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Harian Aspek Kognitif Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Dan Kesehatan. Stabilitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Olahraga, 1(1), 25–31. http://103.81.100.242/index.php/mpj/article/view/485 Sanders, M. R., Morrison, M., Rebgetz, M., Bor, W., Dadds, M., & Shepherd, R. (1990). Behavioural Treatment of Childhood Recurrent Abdominal Pain: Relationships Between Pain, Children’s Psychological Characteristics and Family Functioning. Behaviour Change, 7(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0813483900007373 Saracho, O. N. (1991). Students’ Preference for Field Dependence-Independence Teacher Characteristics. Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110308 Scherf, K. S., Griffin, J. W., Judy, B., Whyte, E. M., Geier, C. F., Elbich, D., & Smyth, J. M. (2018). Improving sensitivity to eye gaze cues in autism using serious game technology: Study protocol for a phase i randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023682 Scifo, L., Fulantelli, G., & Vivas, A. J. (2025). Special Educational Needs in Preschools: Types, Characteristics, and Needed Adaptations. In Physical Education in Early Childhood: Movement and Development from 3 to 6 Years (pp. 359–372). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003615675-25 Selvin, S. (2004). Cytochrome P450 1A1 polymorphism and childhood leukemia: An analysis of matched pairs case-control genotype data. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 13(8), 1371– © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 329 1374. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.1371.13.8 Setiawati, A. S. (2020). Character value in japanese early childhood formed through hajimete no osaka (first errand). International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 4, 516–527. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85081281973?origin=resultslist Shin, D. J. D., Lee, M., Ha, J. E., Park, J. H., Ahn, H. S., Son, E., Chung, Y., & Bong, M. (2019). Science for all: Boosting the science motivation of elementary school students with utility value intervention. Learning and Instruction, 60, 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.12.003 Shin, Y.-J., & Kang, E. (2026). From Tool-Based Training to Integrated Studios: A Review of BIM Education in Architecture. Buildings, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16010166 Silseth, K. (2018). Students’ everyday knowledge and experiences as resources in educational dialogues. Instructional Science, 46(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9429-x Sun, X., Lu, Z.-M., He, Z., Lu, Z., & Luo, H. (2023). Reasoning in Different Directions: Triplet Learning for Scene Graph Generation. IEEE Access, 11, 103069 – 103078. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3310544 Taylor, M., Hodges, S. D., & Kohányi, A. (2003). The Illusion of Independent Agency: Do Adult Fiction Writers Experience Their Characters as Having Minds of Their Own? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 22(4), 361–380. https://doi.org/10.2190/FTG3-Q9T0-7U26-5Q5X Valdivia, J., Mauricio, D., & Guzman-Jimenez, R. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence for Software Development Using ISO/IEC 29110 Basic Profile: Gaps and Opportunities. IEEE Access, 14, 31358– 31377. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3659713 Whiteman, M. (1976). Children’s Conceptions of Psychological Causality as Related to Subjective Responsibility, Conservation, and Language. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 128(2), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1976.10533991 Widl, E., Sporr, A., Mairhofer, M., Natiesta, T., Marx, N., & Schmidt, R. R. (2022). Prototype of an open testbed for the lab validation of smart applications of district heating substations. 2022 10th Workshop on Modelling and Simulation of Cyber-Physical Energy Systems, MSCPES 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSCPES55116.2022.9770173 Wu, K. C., Su, Y., Chu, F., Chen, A. T., & Zaslavsky, O. (2022). Behavioral Change Factors and Retention in Web-Based Interventions for Informal Caregivers of People Living With Dementia: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(7). https://doi.org/10.2196/38595 Zhang, X., Cao, D., Wang, M., Cui, G., Shi, Y., & Cui, Y. (2022). NUTRIENT DEFICIENCY DIAGNOSIS IN WHOLE HYDROPONIC LETTUCE BASED ON RANDOM FOREST; [基于随机森林算法的整株水培生 菜缺素诊断]. INMATEH - Agricultural Engineering, 68(3), 81 – 90. https://doi.org/10.35633/inmateh-6808 Zimmerman, B. J., & Ringle, J. (1981). Effects of model persistence and statements of confidence on children’s self-efficacy and problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.4.485 © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 330