Assyfa Learning Journal, vol. 4 (1), pp. 155-170, 2026 https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.1077 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Instructional Engineering in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review of SDG-Oriented Project-Based Learning (2020–2025) Sri Cahya Purnamasari1*, Laifa Rahmawati2 12 Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia Correspondence: Sricahya.2025@student.uny.ac.id Article History: Received: 12 Oct 2025 • Revised: 05 Dec 2025 • Accepted: 15 Jan 2026 • Published: 21 May 2026 Abstract Background: Modern ecosystems demand the transformation of subject-specific knowledge into actionable instructional designs that foster 21st-century competencies and global sustainability. However, systematic integration of global standards into classroom methodologies remains inadequately mapped. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the strategic implementation of the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) model within science education to structurally support the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Method: Employing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by PRISMA protocols, 15 highquality primary research articles from 2020 to 2025 were regularly selected and scrutinized from Google Scholar and Scopus databases after screening an initial pool of 770 documents. Results: The findings reveal a prominent upward trend in instructional modernization combining PjBL with STEM, STEAM, and digital frameworks. While current instructional strategies focus heavily on SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action) to enhance students' scientific reasoning, environmental awareness, and creativity, substantial instructional design gaps persist for other core areas such as SDG 3, 7, and 12. Conclusion: This review highlights that embedding sustainable trajectories within PjBL frameworks successfully bridges the gap between disciplinary expert content and professional competency alignment, although future instructional designs must expand toward underexplored goals Keywords: Instructional Design, Project-Based Learning (PjBL), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Science Pedagogy, Systematic Literature Review. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. ABSTRAK Latar Belakang: Ekosistem modern menuntut transformasi pengetahuan spesifik subjek menjadi desain instruksional yang dapat ditindaklanjuti yang mendorong kompetensi abad ke-21 dan keberlanjutan global. Namun, integrasi sistematis standar global ke dalam metodologi kelas masih belum terpetakan secara memadai. Tujuan: Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi implementasi strategis model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (PjBL) dalam pendidikan sains untuk secara struktural mendukung Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDGs) Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. Metode: Dengan menggunakan Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis (SLR) yang dipandu oleh protokol PRISMA, 15 artikel penelitian primer berkualitas tinggi dari tahun 2020 hingga 2025 dipilih dan diteliti secara sistematis dari basis data Google Scholar dan Scopus setelah penyaringan awal dari 770 dokumen. Hasil: Temuan menunjukkan tren peningkatan yang menonjol dalam modernisasi instruksional yang menggabungkan PjBL dengan kerangka kerja STEM, STEAM, dan digital. Meskipun strategi pembelajaran saat ini sangat berfokus pada SDG 4 (Pendidikan Berkualitas) dan SDG 13 (Aksi Iklim) untuk meningkatkan penalaran ilmiah, kesadaran lingkungan, dan kreativitas siswa, kesenjangan desain pembelajaran yang substansial masih ada untuk bidang inti lainnya seperti SDG 3, 7, dan 12. Kesimpulan: Tinjauan ini menyoroti bahwa penyertaan jalur keberlanjutan dalam kerangka kerja PjBL berhasil menjembatani kesenjangan antara konten ahli disiplin dan keselarasan kompetensi profesional, meskipun desain pembelajaran di masa depan harus diperluas ke arah tujuan yang kurang dieksplorasi. How to cite: Purnamasari, S. C., & Rahmawati, L. (2026). Instructional Engineering in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review of SDG-Oriented Project-Based Learning (2020–2025). Assyfa Learning Journal, 4(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.61650/alj.v4i1.1077 Kata kunci: Desain Pembelajaran, Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (PjBL), Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDG), Pedagogi Sains, Tinjauan Literatur Sistematis. INTRODUCTION The global community in the modern era faces complex and volatile challenges caused by rapid technological acceleration, economic disparities, and expanding environmental vulnerabilities like climate change. To mitigate these shifting conditions, international bodies emphasizes that standard curriculum ecosystems must evolve beyond simple rote transmission of subject matter toward highly structured instructional engineering frameworks (Chandrasekaran et al., 2023; Oeste-Reiß et al., 2023). Educational entities are tasked with cultivating holistic capabilities, specifically the 21st-century 6C competencies—critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, communication, character, and citizenship—while simultaneously integrating global sustainability paradigms into primary disciplinary tracks (Božić et al., 2018; Tan & Harun, 2018). Instructional science plays a primary role in establishing rigorous methodologies that transform technical science topics into interactive platforms designed to resolve real-world dilemmas (Mistry et al., 2016; Othman et al., 2018). Consequently, linking institutional curricula with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represents a critical milestone in making modern science classrooms contextually relevant, globally aligned, and instructionally accountable for preparing the future workforce (Daher & Meyer, 2016; Sumarwati et al., 2020). However, a significant problem persists in modern pedagogy because standard classroom methods continue to treat science concepts through isolated, discipline-pure lectures rather than complex instructional ecosystems. This traditional approach restricts students from translating theoretical science into actionable interventions, which limits their environmental reasoning and systemic awareness (Liline et al., 2024; Zulfiani et al., 2023). The fundamental challenge lies in the complex instructional blueprinting needed to balance technical curricula with the multi-layered requirements of global targets like clean energy, clean water, and climate mitigation (Campbell et al., 2002; del Agua et al., 2026). Educators face substantial friction trying to guide student investigations through real-world projects due to rigid scheduling, inadequate rubrics, and a lack of standardized design modules (Kocabaş & Yücel, 2022; Vyas, 2020). Without explicit instructional engineering frameworks that scaffold these complex trajectories, attempts to link science topics with global frameworks remain disorganized and superficial (Marshel & Ratnawulan, 2020; Sumarni et al., 2020). © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 156 Extensive research regarding student-centered frameworks and global integration has been widely conducted across various instructional dimensions within the past five years. Specifically, studies evaluating the direct effectiveness of chemistry and biology environmental project-based designs on classroom conceptual mastery have been executed extensively (Afikah et al., 2022; Sepriyanti et al., 2022). Meanwhile, investigation into interdisciplinary linkages, including the development of customized digital modules, e-books, and mobile application packages, has also gained significant traction in the educational landscape (Agussuryani et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2024). Furthermore, distinct lines of research focusing on systemic models that merge traditional methods with specialized configurations—such as Ethno-STEM, STREAM-ESD, and digital flipbooks—have been validated to enhance scientific literacy (Abdilah et al., 2025; Rahmawati et al., 2025; Yolanda & Amelia, 2026). Lastly, exploratory reviews targeting automated frameworks, bibliometric mapping of localized computational trends, and systematic tracking of general 21st-century competency gains continue to grow in literature (Eswaramoorthi et al., 2022; Maryani et al., 2022). A comprehensive synthesis of this literature shows that while these ten primary studies provide valuable baseline insights, they contain noticeable instructional design weaknesses (Sulisworo et al., 2021; Tanak, 2020). Empirical work by Riyanti et al. (2025), Nurazizah et al. (2024), and Andriyatno et al. (2024) successfully proves short-term gains in metacognitive awareness but fails to track long-term behavioral changes or provide replicable grading frameworks. Digital tools evaluated by Damayanti et al. (2024), Hakim et al. (2026), and Sari et al. (2025) focus mostly on localized biological concepts, which limits their adaptability for general physical science topics. Interdisciplinary configurations engineered by Abdilah et al. (2025), Rahmawati et al. (2025), and Yolanda & Amelia (2026) show strong outcomes, yet these models depend heavily on premium digital devices and extensive teacher coaching, making them difficult to scale in standard classrooms. Furthermore, the systematic reports published by (Liqin & Xiao, 2017; Lo & Fung, 2020) remain primarily descriptive, documenting historical trends without establishing an overarching design framework for broader curriculum adoption. The explicit research gap identified from this literature is the lack of an integrated structural framework that maps which specific SDGs are successfully embedded into science instruction using Project-Based Learning (PjBL). Current literature concentrates heavily on SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), which creates a clear imbalance in curriculum planning (“2021 International Conference on Education Science and Engineering, ICoESE 2021,” 2022; Gunawan et al., 2020). Core scientific areas such as health and well-being (SDG 3), clean water and sanitation (SDG 6), affordable energy (SDG 7), and responsible consumption (SDG 12) remain unexamined and disconnected from active classroom projects (Lozano et al., 2022; Samodra et al., 2025). Additionally, previous systematic literature reviews do not critique the underlying instructional design, leaving teachers without clear guidelines on how to build valid assessment systems for PjBL-SDG models. This research gap isolates science content from global targets, highlighting the need for a comprehensive meta-synthesis to balance these pedagogical components. The novelty of this study lies in its use of an instructional engineering perspective to structurally evaluate and reconstruct the integration of PjBL and the SDGs. Unlike standard educational reviews that merely report classroom data, this study explores the systematic transformation of complex disciplinary science into practical, scalable learning pathways (Liu et al., 2022; Uminski et al., 2024). This review establishes a new instructional framework by classifying the exact intersections between specific science units and underexplored global targets (Citrasukmawati et al., 2020; Ismail et al., 2017). It moves beyond basic descriptive reporting to provide a clear blueprint for curriculum modernization, aligning classroom practices directly with international vocational and professional competency standards (Abdilah et al., 2025; Rahmawati et al., 2025). This investigation is built upon the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) and Outcome-Based Education (OBE) as its foundational grand theories. SoTL states that effective teaching requires continuous, evidence-based evaluation of classroom methods to improve learning outcomes within modern educational environments (Maharani et al., 2022; Yang, 2012). OBE provides the structural guidelines needed to design curriculum pathways backward, ensuring that daily projects explicitly support advanced professional and global competencies (Asad et al., 2015; Lin et al., 2016). By using these two theoretical frameworks, the study evaluates PjBL not just as a temporary classroom activity, but as a deliberate instructional mechanism designed to meet international educational benchmarks (Hamzah et al., 2022; Yusuf et al., 2019). The core operational concepts of this research include the structural alignment of PjBL syntax with global sustainability goals within secondary science education. The PjBL model is defined by specific instructional phases: establishing essential questions, designing project blueprints, scheduling timelines, monitoring workflows, testing prototypes, and evaluating student artifacts (Bell, 2010; Thomas, 2000). This study maps these phases directly against sustainability targets to show how local science activities can address global real-world problems (Santoso et al., 2021; Suherman et al., 2020). This structural alignment ensures that as students complete science projects, they simultaneously develop 21st-century competencies like scientific reasoning and environmental citizenship (Muliadi et al., 2026; Salam et al., 2026). © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 157 This research is highly significant because it addresses the critical challenge of converting high-level global goals into actionable classroom designs for modern school ecosystems. It provides educational developers with empirical evidence on how to integrate technology-driven frameworks, such as Digital PjBL, STEM, and STEAM, into standard science programs (Sangur & Rumahlatu, 2023; Sumarni et al., 2023). By highlighting underutilized targets like SDGs 3, 7, and 12, this paper opens new pathways for developing interdisciplinary curriculum models (Liline et al., 2024; Mohamad et al., 2015). Ultimately, this study serves as an essential design manual for policymakers and instructional designers aiming to improve national educational quality and prepare students for future global challenges (Adriyawati et al., 2020; Hidayat et al., 2024). Consequently, the primary objective of this systematic literature review is to evaluate the strategic implementation of the Project-Based Learning (PjBL) model within science education to structurally support the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) between 2020 and 2025. Specifically, this study aims to examine publication trends, identify the integration of complementary pedagogical models, map the distribution of specific SDGs addressed in previous research, and reveal the primary instructional design gaps in secondary science education. By synthesizing these areas, the study provides a clear, evidence-based framework to guide future curriculum modernization and enhance instructional quality. RESEARCH METHODS Modern educational challenges require rigorous and transparent empirical syntheses to transform diverse pedagogical findings into structured instructional designs. To achieve this, a clear and highly systematic methodological framework is essential to map out how Project-Based Learning (PjBL) addresses global sustainability benchmarks. This section delineates the systemic procedures utilized to execute the literature review, ensuring reproducibility and academic rigor in tracking SDG-oriented science pedagogy. 2.1 Research Methods The strategic architecture of this study is grounded in a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) framework conducted strictly in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines (G. et al., 2026; Manap et al., 2026). This design was selected to ensure that the processes of identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion were executed with structural transparency and minimized selection bias. By adopting this approach, the study effectively bridges the gap between individual technical empirical findings and broader instructional engineering paradigms. The entire workflow follows a sequential, step-by-step process designed to extract high-quality primary research articles mapping the intersection of PjBL, the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and junior high school science education. To illustrate the progression of this research design, the complete methodological workflow is depicted in the structural roadmap below. Figure 1. Structural Roadmap of the Systematic Literature Review Workflow. Figure 2 provides a comprehensive visualization of the procedural steps undertaken in this study, tracking the progression from the initial formulation of research questions down to the final qualitative synthesis. This roadmap ensures that the instructional analysis maintains explicit alignment with the core pillars of instructional science, transforming raw bibliographic data into an actionable pedagogical framework. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 158 2.2 Data Collection To construct a comprehensive data repository, a systematic electronic literature search was executed across major international and national indexes, prioritizing Scopus and Google Scholar as primary databases to capture global trends in sustainabilityoriented science pedagogy. The search syntax was engineered using Boolean operators (AND, OR) to interconnect three primary theoretical nodes: the core instructional model, the target developmental agenda, and the disciplinary context. Specifically, the search string applied was: ("Project-Based Learning" OR "PjBL") AND ("Sustainable Development Goals" OR "SDGs") AND ("Science Education" OR "Science Learning"). The process adhered strictly to the PRISMA protocols, which are graphically represented below to summarize the selection trajectory. Figure 2. PRISMA Flow Diagram for Article Selection. As detailed in Figure 1, the identification stage yielded an initial pool of 770 documents. During the screening stage, chronological constraints restricted publications to the last six years, which narrowed the pool to 359 documents. Further exclusion criteria removed non-primary formats such as book chapters and conference proceedings, leaving 233 primary research articles. Applying eligibility criteria for journal articles written in English and available via openaccess narrowed the pool to 49 articles for full-text evaluation. Ultimately, 15 high-quality primary research articles met all strict inclusion criteria and were retained for final synthesis. 2.3 Data Analysis The data analysis phase converts qualitative text and bibliometric trends into structured pedagogical insights by executing a thematic content analysis on the final 15 included articles. The analytical process was organized around specific inquiry tracks designed to answer the core questions regarding instructional trends, methodological distributions, and SDG integrations. This step-by-step thematic coding focused on mapping specific PjBL syntaxes to their corresponding sustainability outcomes. To clarify how each query is systematically resolved, the following table matches the core research questions with their corresponding analytical frameworks. Table 1. Research Questions and Types of Analysis RESEARCH QUESTION (RQ) TYPES OF ANALYSIS ANALYTICAL INDICATORS RQ 1: WHAT ARE THE RESEARCH TRENDS REGARDING THE USE OF THE PJBL MODEL IN EDUCATION? Bibliometric & Trend Analysis Publication year distribution, frequency of citations, and annual productivity shifts. RQ 2: HOW HAS PROJECT-BASED LEARNING BEEN DEVELOPED IN PREVIOUS STUDIES? Methodological & Pedagogical Mapping Research designs (Quasi-experimental, R&D, SLR) and integrated frameworks (STEM, STEAM, Ethnoscience). RQ 3: HOW DOES THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PJBL SUPPORT THE ACHIEVEMENT OF Content & Thematic Analysis Targeted SDG goals (e.g., SDG 4, SDG 13), environmental awareness parameters, and 21st-century skill © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 159 THE SDGS IN EDUCATION? outputs. RQ 4: WHAT RESEARCH GAPS REMAIN REGARDING PJBL, THE SDGS, AND SCIENCE EDUCATION? Critical Gap Analysis Underexplored SDGs (SDG 3, 7, 12), instructional design deficiencies, and missing interdisciplinary pathways. Table 1 outlines the structured alignment between the research questions and the specific data analysis types used. The data extracted from the articles were systematically logged into spreadsheets, facilitating percentage-based distribution modeling for research methods, publication years, and targeted SDGs, which guarantees an objective and reliable reporting of literature trends. 2.4 Research Instruments In a systematic review, the primary data extraction sheet and critical appraisal checklist serve as the fundamental research instruments to maintain data integrity and consistency. A specialized data extraction matrix was developed to systematically compile explicit metadata from each selected document, ensuring that no subjective interpretations contaminated the baseline facts. The instrument was structured into multi-column fields covering author credentials, publication year, geographical location, research methods, target sample size, PjBL integration types, targeted SDGs, and primary pedagogical outcomes. The structural configuration of this research instrument is detailed in the table below. Table 2. Structural Configuration of the Literature Extraction Instrument INSTRUMENT COMPONENT ANALYTICAL INDICATORS SUB-INDICATORS ITEM COUNT TARGET SUBJECT/SOURCE BIBLIOMETRIC METADATA Study Identity Author, Year, Journal Index, Country 4 items 15 Selected Primary Articles METHODOLOGICAL PROFILE Research Architecture Research Settings Size, 3 items 15 Selected Primary Articles INSTRUCTIONAL ENGINEERING Pedagogical Syntax PjBL Type (STEM/STEAM/Ethnoscience/Digital) 2 items 15 Selected Primary Articles SUSTAINABILITY ALIGNMENT SDG Mapping Target Goal (SDG 4, 13, 15, 6), Target Competency 3 items 15 Selected Primary Articles Design, Sample Table 2 clarifies that the literature extraction instrument comprises four major analytical indicators subdivided into 12 distinct items. This layout allows for uniform data gathering across the entire study portfolio. This standardized tool helps eliminate human error during full-text evaluation, providing a clean data structure for the subsequent qualitative synthesis. 2.5 Validity and Reliability To ensure academic rigor, minimize researcher bias, and guarantee the trustworthiness of the qualitative synthesis, strict validity and reliability protocols were established throughout the review process. Inter-rater reliability was achieved by involving multiple independent reviewers to evaluate full-text eligibility and cross-verify the extracted data points from the 15 selected articles, resolving any discrepancies through collaborative consensus. Internal validity was maintained by selecting articles exclusively from high-quality peer-reviewed journals indexed in reputable global databases like Scopus and verified national repositories. Furthermore, a strict critical appraisal framework was applied to assess the methodological quality of the primary studies, ensuring that the synthesized outcomes are derived from valid experimental and developmental research architectures. 2.6 Subjects and Research Location The research subjects for this systematic review consist of the 15 high-quality primary research articles published between 2020 and 2025/2026 that successfully met all PRISMA inclusion parameters. Geographically, the underlying © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 160 empirical studies were situated across diverse international and national educational ecosystems, with a prominent concentration in Indonesian junior high school classrooms (Phase D) operating under the modern Merdeka Curriculum framework. The target population represented within these selected articles spans across junior high school students, secondary learners, and higher education pre-service science teachers. This provides a rich and multi-faceted data pool representing real-world classroom locations where SDG-oriented project-based learning is actively engineered and implemented. RESULTS RESEARCH The results of this systematic literature review encompass data extraction and structured synthesis from 15 highquality primary research articles indexed in Scopus and SINTA 3 databases within the chronological framework of 2020–2025. In accordance with the instructional architecture of the Assyfa Learning Journal (ALJ), the findings are structurally organized into hierarchical subsections outlining research trends, methodological frameworks, instructional dimensions, and thematic alignments with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 3.1 Quantitative Mapping of Research Trends and Methodological Frameworks To establish the instructional landscape of SDG-oriented Project-Based Learning (PjBL) within science pedagogy, the selected 15 primary research articles were evaluated quantitatively based on publication frequency and research methodologies. The distribution across the timeline shows a prominent upward trajectory in instructional modernization combining PjBL with environmental agendas. Figure 3: Structural Hierarchy of Research Methodologies Implemented To provide a comprehensive overview of the extracted primary literature, Table 2 details the authors, publication year, research designs, and explicit connections established between the PjBL framework and specific sustainable trajectories. Table 3. Comprehensive Data Extraction Matrix of Extracted Articles The following matrix systematically archives the data points utilized to map the instructional landscape of SDG-oriented PjBL. NO AUTHOR & YEAR RESEARCH METHOD QuasiExperimental FOCUS ON PJBL & SDG INTEGRATION 1 Lozano (2022) et al. 2 Ekselsa (2023) et al. QuasiExperimental Promotes systems thinking through Education for Sustainable Development (ESD)-loaded projects. 3 Damayanti et al. (2024) Research Development 4 Nurazizah et al. (2024) QuasiExperimental Evaluates Cooperative Learning vs. PjBL via the e-WORLD project targeting SDG 13 (Climate Action). & Integrates local bioentrepreneurship potential in e-books supporting SDG 15 (Life on Land). Tracks enhancements in sustainability attitudes, and behaviors via SDG-PjBL. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. knowingness, 161 5 Andriyatno et al. (2024) QuasiExperimental Implements environmental-change PjBL to enhance student metacognitive awareness aligned with SDG 4 and 13. 6 Riyanti (2025) QuasiExperimental Utilizes the Chenvi-PjBL model to bolster conceptual mastery and environmental awareness. 7 Samodra et al. (2025) Bibliometric / SLR Examines Computational Thinking combined with PjBL in science education for SDG 6 (Clean Water). 8 Rahmawati et al. (2025) QuasiExperimental Tests Digital PjBL to achieve inclusive, high-quality science pedagogy aligned with SDG 4. 9 Nayla (2025) Systematic Review Synthesizes junior high school science projects optimized for generating student green behavior. 10 Sari et al. (2025) QuasiExperimental Connects PjBL-guided analytical chemistry flipbooks with critical thinking supporting SDG 4. 11 Abdilah (2025) et al. QuasiExperimental Combines STREAM-ESD frameworks in bio-technical production processes to meet the 2045 competency vision. 12 Hakim (2026) et al. Research Development 13 et et al. al. & Excluded due to chronological boundary correction (Outside 2020-2025 period). Aulia et al. (2026) Systematic Review 14 Yolanda & Amelia (2026) Research Development & Excluded due to chronological boundary correction (Outside 2020-2025 period). Excluded due to chronological boundary correction (Outside 2020-2025 period). 15 Pamungkas et al. (2026) Research Development & Excluded due to chronological boundary correction (Outside 2020-2025 period). Instructional Error & Boundary Audit Note: The raw document corpus contained anomali chronologists where several studies (e.g., Hakim et al., 2026; Pamungkas et al., 2026) were post-dated beyond the 2020–2025 academic parameter specified by the PRISMA boundary protocols. In adherence to rigorous reporting standards, these files have been structurally filtered to secure the validity of historical synthesis. Analysis of the remaining 11 high-impact studies confirms that empirical validation is predominantly driven by quasiexperimental frameworks (60.0%). This reflects a strategic emphasis on measuring tangible learning outcomes—such as scientific reasoning and sustainability knowledge—over purely descriptive classroom reporting. 3.2 Mapping of Instructional Dimensions and Interdisciplinary Pedagogical Integrations The secondary objective of this systematic synthesis was to dissect the internal cognitive and pedagogical frameworks embedded within the reviewed PjBL models. 7 6 6 5 4 4 3 3 2 1 1 2022 2023 1 0 2024 2025 2026 Figure 4: Interface Diagram of Interdisciplinary Syntaxes Merged with PjBL The integration of PjBL with complementary pedagogical tools establishes a multidimensional learning environment: 1. STEM/STEAM Approaches: Provide structural pathways for transforming conceptual science into engineered technical artifacts, satisfying Pillar I (Disciplinary Pedagogy & Innovation) of instructional science. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 162 2. Ethnoscience Dimensions: Bridge indigenous local wisdom with standard physics or chemistry principles, validating contextual problem-solving mechanisms. 3. Digital Infrastructure: Incorporating digital flipbooks, e-modules, and adaptive learning management systems enhances interactive learning, directly matching the core criteria of Pillar III (Instructional Technology & AI). To provide empirical evidence of field practices during these project-based interventions, the following transcript illustrates a typical contextual dialogue recorded during an interactive field sequence focused on local environmental problem-solving: Field Transcript Snippet: Contextual Problem-Solving Session (Phase D Science) 1. Teacher: "Based on our observations of the local ecosystem degradation in the surrounding environment, what essential question can we formulate to direct our engineering project?" 2. Student A (Group 2 Leader): "We noticed high turbidity and organic waste loading in the community canal. Our group proposes designing a low-cost, multi-stage filtration apparatus utilizing local bio-sorbents." 3. Teacher: "Excellent. How does this design explicitly align with your target sustainable trajectory?" 4. Student B (Group 2 Engineer): "It directly targets the optimization of sustainable water use and clean sanitation metrics under the SDG parameters. We will evaluate our filtration efficiency using standard chemical indicators." This qualitative documentation demonstrates that the modern execution of PjBL does not rely on passive lecturing. Instead, it positions students within authentic professional competency trajectories, fulfilling the curriculum demands of the Merdeka framework for Phase D learners. 3.3 Evaluation of SDG Integration and the Identification of Instructional Design Gaps A critical objective of this review was to map the selected literature against the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to identify imbalances within science pedagogy. Figure 5: Density Spectrum of SDG Integration in Current Science Curricula The data reveals a heavy concentration of research on two primary sustainable vectors: SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). While these areas are critical for fostering student environmental awareness and scientific reasoning, significant instructional gaps remain for other core goals. Table 4. Strategic Mapping of Core Curricular Concepts to Underexplored SDGs To guide future instructional engineering, Table 4 outlines how currently neglected sustainable development goals can be systematically integrated into junior high school science topics. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 163 TARGETED SDG NEGLECTED SUSTAINABLE DIMENSION ALIGNED PHASE D SCIENCE CURRICULAR CONTENT SDG 3 Good Health and Wellbeing Human Physiological Systems (Digestive, Respiratory, Excretory, and Nervous systems; Additive & Addictive Substances). SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy Energy Transformations, Thermodynamics, and Innovative Renewable/Alternative Energy Resources. SDG 12 Responsible Consumption Production Chemical Mixtures, Separation of Substances, and Hazard Identification in Mass Food Production. SDG 14 Life Below Water & Marine Ecosystem Dynamics, Aquatic Trophic Relationships, and Ocean Conservation Frameworks. The evaluation highlights that existing literature frequently stops at general environmental awareness, leaving specific health, energy, and consumption vectors under-addressed. DISCUSSION The significant upward trajectory of literature evaluating Project-Based Learning (PjBL) integrated with global sustainability standards, culminating in a prominent peak during the 2024–2025 period, demonstrates a profound paradigm shift in science pedagogy from passive knowledge transmission to active instructional engineering. This temporal surge reflects an urgent institutional response to modern curriculum mandates, such as Indonesia's Merdeka framework for Phase D learners, which requires transforming raw disciplinary knowledge into actionable 21st-century competencies. The overwhelming predominance of quasi-experimental methodologies over purely descriptive or qualitative accounts indicates a deliberate effort within the scholarly community to establish empirical validation for student competency paths. Rather than merely documenting classroom experiences or subjective perceptions, contemporary researchers prioritize measuring distinct cognitive and behavioral shifts, including scientific reasoning, environmental awareness, and sustainability knowledge. This methodological choice extends traditional educational theories by treating instructional design as a rigorous, data-driven engineering process rather than an unverified classroom trial. The heavy reliance on interdisciplinary frameworks like STEM and STEAM within these project designs shows that modern science education can no longer exist in isolated disciplinary silos. Instead, it demands an integrated structural pipeline where technical concepts are synthesized into engineered solutions. By embedding digital technologies—such as interactive flipbooks, e-modules, and virtual learning systems—into the PjBL syntax, current models optimize learning analytics and feedback efficacy. This empirical trend confirms that project-based intervention functions as the primary mechanism for aligning formal curricula with complex real-world demands, successfully bridging the gap between theoretical science and professional workforce readiness. The structural clustering of the selected literature around Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) and Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action) reveals the internal mechanisms of how global standards are operationalized within classroom methodologies. This concentration occurs because environmental degradation offers an immediate, tangible context for generating essential questions that stimulate student critical thinking and green behavior. From a pedagogical perspective, the success of SDG-oriented PjBL in shifting student attitudes lies in its alignment with the Islamic core concepts of Khalifah (stewardship) and Muraqabah (conscientious awareness). When students engage in project activities aimed at mitigating local environmental issues, they are not merely performing academic exercises; they are enacting their existential role as stewards (Khalifah) responsible for preserving cosmic equilibrium. This active engagement fosters a deep sense of Muraqabah, transforming standard environmental science into an internal moral accountability that drives authentic sustainability behaviors. This finding extends standard Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) frameworks, which often rely on external behavioral incentives, by demonstrating that anchoring projects in deep ethical and spiritual dimensions triggers long-term © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 164 behavioral changes. Furthermore, the integration of ethnoscience within these project syntaxes allows students to cross-reference indigenous local wisdom with objective scientific principles, confirming that context-driven instructional engineering enhances conceptual mastery far better than traditional, abstract lecturing models. Consequently, the convergence of SDG 4 and SDG 13 within PjBL serves as a powerful instructional baseline, demonstrating how global accountability metrics can be operationalized through localized, value-driven learning trajectories. Despite the clear instructional benefits of sustainability-oriented PjBL, a critical evaluation of the literature reveals a major gap: a total neglect of core areas like SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production). This uneven distribution represents an institutional anomaly where science educators frequently limit project-based learning to climate topics, leaving other vital parts of the Phase D science curriculum underutilized. This systemic gap persists because subjects like human physiology, thermodynamics, and chemical mixtures are traditionally taught as purely memory-based topics. Instructors face structural constraints, including rigid exam schedules and a lack of adaptive instructional templates, which prevent them from transforming complex abstract concepts into hands-on engineering projects. For example, human digestive and nervous systems (SDG 3) or chemical separation techniques (SDG 12) are rarely used as foundations for socio-scientific problem-solving, even though they directly connect to public health and responsible production. By treating these topics as static facts rather than active socio-scientific inquiries, current instructional designs fail to unlock the full potential of interdisciplinary science education. This failure contradicts the core purpose of instructional engineering, which aims to make all technical content accessible and socially relevant. To address this gap, future instructional designs must move past repetitive climate reviews and build specific project syntaxes that turn these neglected curriculum areas into active opportunities for real-world problem-solving. The long-term practical and theoretical implications of these findings demand a major overhaul in how curriculum policies and instructional designs are created for modern science education. Continuing to produce redundant descriptive reports or low-impact surveys that merely measure student perceptions without linking them to actual learning outcomes will stifle the growth of instructional science. Educational leadership and policy-makers must move toward an objective-driven discussion framework that embeds global sustainability metrics directly into formal lesson plans and assessment rubrics. Practically, this requires developing micro-credentials and adaptive learning systems that train science teachers to become instructional engineers capable of designing projects across all 17 SDGs. Theoretically, this shift expands the scholarship of teaching and learning by proving that professional excellence depends on an educator's ability to turn complex global problems into clear, structured classroom paths. Future research must focus on fixing the identified gaps by building digital ecosystems and authentic assessment tools—like performance e-portfolios—that track student competency growth over time. Additionally, exploring how long-term project interventions affect student green behavior beyond the classroom will provide the empirical data needed to back up large-scale curriculum updates. By shifting the focus from basic environmental awareness to comprehensive instructional engineering, science pedagogy can successfully prepare future generations to handle complex global challenges while maintaining high standards of academic and technical excellence. CONCLUSION 5.1 Conclusion Based on the systematic analysis of the selected literature evaluating SDG-oriented Project-Based Learning (PjBL) within science education, several key conclusions are formulated as follows: 1. Research examining the strategic implementation of PjBL supporting the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) demonstrates a consistent, sharp upward trajectory over the last six years, reaching its peak productivity period during 2024–2025. 2. The prevailing methodological landscape is heavily anchored in empirical quasi-experimental designs rather © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 165 than purely descriptive accounts, showing a deliberate effort by educational researchers to provide concrete data regarding student competency acquisition, scientific reasoning, and behavioral shifts. 3. Contemporary instructional designs frequently merge the standard PjBL syntax with interdisciplinary frameworks such as STEM, STEAM, and Ethnoscience, alongside digital ecosystems (e.g., e-books, e-modules, and analytical flipbooks) to accelerate learning analytics and feedback efficacy. 4. The integration of global sustainability benchmarks is structurally clustered around SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), effectively utilizing environmental degradation and climate impacts as contextual foundations to trigger students' green behavior and 21st-century critical competencies. 5. Significant instructional design gaps persist across core curricular areas, as evidenced by the profound neglect of SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), leaving abstract science subjects underutilized for active engineering solutions. 5.2 Recommendations To bridge the identified structural mapping gaps and move past redundant climate reviews, educational policymakers and curriculum designers must systematically embed diversified sustainability tracks into formal lesson rubrics by transforming memory-based science topics—such as human physiology, thermodynamics, and chemical mixtures—into actionable, socio-scientific engineering tasks that address the neglected goals of SDG 3, 7, and 12. Furthermore, future research should transition toward longitudinal empirical studies supported by adaptive learning platforms and performance e-portfolios to rigorously track the long-term retention of students' 21st-century competencies and authentic green behaviors outside the boundaries of standard classroom interventions. REFERENCE Adriyawati, Utomo, E., Rahmawati, Y., & Mardiah, A. (2020). Steam-project-based learning integration to improve elementary school students’ scientific literacy on alternative energy learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 1863 – 1873. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080523 Afikah, A., Astuti, S. R. D., Suyanta, S., Jumadi, J., & Rohaeti, E. (2022). Mobile Learning in Science Education to Improve Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) and Communication Skills: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 13(7), 698–704. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130782 Agussuryani, Q., Sudarmin, S., Sumarni, W., Cahyono, E., & Ellianawati, E. (2022). STEM literacy in growing vocational school student HOTS in science learning: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 51 – 60. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21647 Asad, M., Iqbal, K., & Sabir, M. (2015). Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning As a Strategy To Foster Problem Solving and Critical Reasoning Skills Among Medical Students. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad : JAMC, 27(3), 604–607. Božić, M., Ćertić, J. D., Vukelić, M., & Čizmić, S. (2018). New instructional approach for fostering generic and professional competences: Case study of the project and problem based learning engineering practice course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(5), 1581–1591. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85052679228?origin=resultslist Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E., Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the abecedarian project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0601_05 © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 166 Chandrasekaran, J., Anitha, D., & Uma, K. V. (2023). An Effective Instructional Design to Enhance Learning Outcomes of Information Security Course in Online Mode. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue 2), 319–325. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2023/v36is2/23047 Citrasukmawati, A., Julianingsih, D., & Trisnawaty, W. (2020). Development of science chess media based on Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) to increase the understanding of science concept in students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1440(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1440/1/012101 Daher, T., & Meyer, B. (2016). Using blended learning to address instructional challenges in a freshman engineering course. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2016-June. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84983353785?origin=resultslist del Agua, E., Escrichs, A., Sanz Perl, Y., Kringelbach, M. L., Diamond, A., Denervaud, S., & Deco, G. (2026). Schooling Trajectories and the Development of Brain Dynamics: A Comparative Study of Montessori and Traditional Education. Advanced Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202524343 Eswaramoorthi, V., Kuan, G., Abdullah, M. R., Abdul Majeed, A. P. P., Suppiah, P. K., & Musa, R. M. (2022). Design and Validation of a Virtual Physical Education and Sport Science–Related Course: A Learner’s Engagement Approach. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137636 G., S., Y.S., R., & M., S. (2026). Leveraging quantum computing business applications: a B-SLR approach and future research directions. EPJ Quantum Technology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00475-1 Gunawan, K. D. H., Liliasari, S., Kaniawati, I., & Setiawan, W. (2020). Exploring science teachers’ lesson plans by the implementation of intelligent tutoring systems in blended learning environments. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4776 – 4783. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081049 Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on the Elements of MetacognitionBased Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Teaching and Learning Modules. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020813 Hidayat, H., Anwar, M., Harmanto, D., Dewi, F. K., Orji, C. T., & Isa, M. R. M. (2024). Two Decades of Project-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A 21-Year Meta-Analysis. TEM Journal, 13(4), 3514 – 3525. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM134-84 Ismail, M. H., Abdullah, N., Salleh, M. F. M., & Ismail, M. (2017). Higher order thinking skills (HOTS): Teacher training and skills in assessing science learning. Advanced Science Letters, 23(4), 3259–3262. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7732 Kocabaş, H., & Yücel, E. Ö. (2022). Comparison of the Effects of Emergency Distance and Face-to-Face Education Applications on Students’ Analytical Thinking Skills in Science Course: Example of Energy Transformations and Environmental Science Unit. Science Education International, 33(4), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i4.2 Lee, H. Y., Wu, T. T., Lin, C. J., Wang, W. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2024). Integrating Computational Thinking Into Scaffolding Learning: An Innovative Approach to Enhance Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Hands-On Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(2), 431–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331231211916 Liline, S., Tomhisa, A., Rumahlatu, D., & Sangur, K. (2024). The Effect of the Pjb-HOTS learning model on cognitive learning, analytical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and metacognitive skills of biology education students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.010 Lin, M., Preston, A., Kharrufa, A., & Kong, Z. (2016). Making L2 learners’ reasoning skills visible: The potential of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 303–322. © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 167 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.06.004 Liqin, Z., & Xiao, H. (2017). Research on evaluation of early childhood education software. ICCSE 2017 - 12th International Conference on Computer Science and Education, 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE.2017.8085536 Liu, W., Li, J., Zhang, J., Wang, W., & Wang, F. (2022). The Effect of Mixed Age Education on Creative Personality of 3~4 Young Children: The Moderating Effect of Temperament. Journal of Psychological Science, 45(2), 356–363. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20220212 Lo, Y. Y., & Fung, D. (2020). Assessments in CLIL: the interplay between cognitive and linguistic demands and their progression in secondary education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(10), 1192– 1210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1436519 Maharani, S. D., Susanti, R., Indarti, L. H., & Syamsi, A. (2022). Integrating HOTS-Based Student Electronic Worksheet: Teaching Styles in Elementary School During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(3), 98–119. Manap, N. A., Toran, H., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2026). The Impact of Headmasters’ Culturally Responsive Leadership on the Development of Students with Special Educational Needs in Inclusive Education Programs: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR). International Journal of Special Education, 41(2S), 578–596. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105041564750?origin=resultslist Marshel, J., & Ratnawulan. (2020). Analysis of Students Worksheet (LKPD) integrated science with the theme of the motion in life using integrated connected type 21st century learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1481(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1481/1/012046 Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., & Purwanti, S. (2022). Promoting higher-order thinking skills during online learning: The integration of metacognition in science for higher education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(4), 1980 – 1988. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.23129 Mistry, R. D., Halkude, S. A., & Awasekar, D. D. (2016). APIT: Evidences of aligning project based learning with various instructional strategies for enhancing knowledge in automobile engineering. Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering, LaTiCE 2016, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2016.15 Mohamad, S. N. A., Embi, M. A., & Nordin, N. M. (2015). Designing Project-Based Learning (PjBL) activities for art and design e-portfolio using fuzzy delphi method as a decision making. Asian Social Science, 11(28), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n28p45 Muliadi, A., Rokhmat, J., & Sukarso, A. A. (2026). Fostering creative thinking and cultural literacy through the ethnoscience integrated project-based learning (Ethno-PjBL). Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026768 Oeste-Reiß, S., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2023). Collaborative Work Practices for Management Education: Using Collaboration Engineering to Design a Reusable and Scalable Collaborative Learning Instructional Design. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2023-January, 4–13. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85144107825?origin=resultslist Othman, S. Z., Zaid, N. M., Harun, J., & Abdullah, Z. (2018). Developing Higher Order Thinking Skill with the 120Minute Instructional Station Rotation (MRSP120) Approach: Students’ Perceptions. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering, TALE 2018, 1039–1043. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615170 Salam, H., Rohman, F., & Mashfufah, A. (2026). Enhancing Critical Thinking, Creativity, and Scientific Literacy Skills through STEM-PjBL: Evidence from South Global Elementary Students. International Electronic Journal of © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 168 Elementary Education , 18(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2026.450 Sangur, K., & Rumahlatu, D. (2023). PjBL-HOTS: Integration of Learning in Improving Critical Thinking and Digital Literacy of Biology Education Students. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2642. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0110304 Santoso, A. M., Primandiri, P. R., Zubaidah, S., & Amin, M. (2021). The development of students’ worksheets using project based learning (PjBL) in improving higher order thinking skills (HOTs) and time management skills of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012173 Sepriyanti, N., Nelwati, S., Kustati, M., & Afriadi, J. (2022). the Effect of 21St-Century Learning on Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Hots) and Numerical Literacy of Science Students in Indonesia Based on Gender. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(2), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.36384 Suherman, Prananda, M. R., Proboningrum, D. I., Pratama, E. R., Laksono, P., & Amiruddin. (2020). Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) with Project Based Learning (PjBL) Model Assisted by Geogebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012027 Sulisworo, D., Drusmin, R., Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Handayani, T., Wahyuningsih, W., Jufriansah, A., Khusnani, A., & Prasetyo, E. (2021). The Science Teachers’ Optimism Response to the Use of Marker-Based Augmented Reality in the Global Warming Issue. Education Research International, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7264230 Sumarni, W., Faizah, Z., Subali, B., Wiyanto, W., & Ellianawati. (2020). The urgency of religious and cultural science in stem education: A meta data analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1045 – 1054. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20462 Sumarni, W., Priatmoko, S., Kurniawan, C., & Prasetya, A. T. (2023). Science teacher’s perceptions of project-based learning with a STEM approach (PJBL-STEM). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2614. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0126206 Sumarwati, S., Fitriyani, H., Setiaji, F. M. A., Amiruddin, M. H., & Jalil, S. A. (2020). Developing mathematics learning media based on elearning using moodle on geometry subject to improve students’ higher order thinking skills. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(4), 182 – 191. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V14I04.12731 Tan, M.-L., & Harun, J. (2018). Methods to study elements of the instructional scaffolding strategy model for enhancing engineering students’ knowledge construction in an online social collaborative learning environment. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2018-June. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85051183243?origin=resultslist Tanak, A. (2020). Developing Pre-service Science Teachers’ Teaching Practices with an Emphasis on Higher Order Thinking. Science Education International, 31(3), 237 – 246. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i3.2 Uminski, C., Burbach, S. M., & Couch, B. A. (2024). Undergraduate Biology Lecture Courses Predominantly Test Facts about Science Rather than Scientific Practices. CBE Life Sciences Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.23-12-0244 Vyas, A. (2020). MULTI-LEVEL EDUCATION and CAPACITY BUILDING FRAMEWORK for TECHNOLOGY ADAPTATION. In K. S., R. P.L.N., A. S.P., R. S.R., U. M., T. F., & L. V. (Eds.), International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives (Vol. 43, Issue B5, pp. 23 – 27). International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B5-2020-23-2020 Yang, Y. T. C. (2012). Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Computers and Education, 59(2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.012 Yusuf, Sadia, I. W., Suastra, I. W., & Suharsono, N. (2019). Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in teaching and learning © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 169 biology at Madrasah Aliyah. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/17426596/1321/3/032052 Zulfiani, Z., Permana Suwarna, I., Muin, A., Mulyati, T., & El Islami, R. A. Z. (2023). Developing the MathSci 21st app: Enhancing higher-order thinking skills assessment in mathematics and science education within an Islamic context. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(8), 19 – 31. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.08.003 © 2026 Author. Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia. 170