Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies AJIS. Vol. 3 No.1 (2025) Page 97-120 e-ISSN: 2988-7399 p-ISSN: 2988-7399 DOI: 10.6160/ajis.v3i1.616 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Beyond Technical Efficiency: Integrating Islamic Reflective Pedagogy into Digital Learning Design Mu’in Abdullah1 1* , and Sukari 2 1 Institut Islam Mamba’ul ‘Ulum, Surakarta, Indonesia; 2 Institut Islam Mamba’ul ‘Ulum, Surakarta, Indonesia Correspondence: muinalummah@yahoo.com Article History: Received: 12 April 2024 • Revised: 05 Dec 2024 • Accepted: 15 Jan 2025 • Published: 20 Jun 2025 ABSTRACT In today's rapidly evolving digital era, critical thinking skills, ethical literacy, and independent learning have become essential competencies for students, and reflective, dialogical pedagogy-based teaching is seen as the most effective creative strategy for fostering depth of meaning. This research is motivated by the phenomenon of the transformation of Islamic education (tarbiyah) pedagogy, which tends to be trapped in th e mechanical adoption of technology. Meanwhile, Islamic education research has largely evaluated the effectiveness of media on students' cognitive and motor skills without addressing the deeper spiritual dimension. The primary objective of this research is to formulate an integrative framework that synergizes digital innovation with Islamic values to ensure the sustainability of character development in cyberspace. Using qualitative methods through a conceptual -analytical study design and a systematic literature review of journals and education policy documents, data were analyzed thematically to map gaps in contemporary practices. The results reveal that current digital learning is still dominated by a technicalinstrumental approach, which results in superficial internalization of values. Learning designs that are not valueoriented fail to significantly shape students' moral integrity. The findings indicate that scaffolding through the educator's role as a facilitator of meaning and value guidance is more influential than the sophistication of the technological devices themselves. In conclusion, the integration of Islamic values into digital learning design innovations is not simply a methodological choice, but rather a moral and pedagogical imperative to create humanistic, relevant, and meaningful education in the digital age. 98 ABSTRAK Di era digital yang berkembang pesat saat ini, keterampilan berpikir kritis, literasi etis, dan kemandirian belajar menjadi kompetensi esensial bagi siswa, di mana pengajaran berbasis pedagogi reflektif dan dialogis dipandang sebagai strategi kreatif yang paling efektif untuk menumbuhkan kedalaman makna. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh fenomena transformasi pedagogi tarbiyah yang cenderung terjebak pada adopsi teknologi secara mekanis; sementara selama ini, penelitian pendidikan Islam lebih banyak meng evaluasi efektivitas media terhadap hasil kognitif dan motorik siswa tanpa menyentuh dimensi spiritual yang mendalam. Tujuan utama penelitian ini adalah merumuskan kerangka kerja integratif yang menyinergikan inovasi digital dengan nilai -nilai Islam guna memastikan keberlanjutan karakter di ruang siber. Menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui desain studi konseptual -analitis dan tinjauan literatur sistematis terhadap jurnal serta dokumen kebijakan pendidikan, data dianalisis secara tematik untuk memetakan kesenjangan praktik kontemporer. Hasil penelitian mengungkap bahwa pembelajaran digital saat ini masih didominasi pendekatan teknis-instrumental yang berdampak pada internalisasi nilai yang superfisial, di mana desain pembelajaran yang tidak berorientasi nilai gagal membentuk integritas moral siswa secara signifikan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa scaffolding melalui peran pendidik sebagai fasilitator makna dan panduan nilai lebih berpengaruh dibandingkan kecanggihan perangkat teknologi itu sendiri. Kesimpulannya, i ntegrasi nilai Islam ke dalam inovasi desain pembelajaran digital bukan sekadar pilihan metodologis, melainkan keharusan moral dan pedagogis untuk menciptakan pendidikan yang humanistik, relevan, dan bermakna di era digital . How to cite: Haliza, S. N., & Mukminin, M. A. (2025). Deconstructing Ta’dzim Culture: The Implementation of Sayyidah Aisyah’s Critical Pedagogy to Foster Discursive Logic Among Santri. Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v3i1.312 Keywords: Tarbiyah Pedagogy, Learning Innovation, Islamic Values, Digital Era, Reflective Pedagogy. 1. INTRODUCTION The rapid expansion of digital infrastructures has catalyzed a profound metamorphosis in global educational systems, necessitating a shift in underlying pedagogical paradigms (Jornet et al., 2025; Cárcamo & Pérez, 2022). This technological surge has dismantled traditional barriers to geographic distance and temporal constraints, enabling a more inclusive educational reach (Safonov et al., 2022; Thurber et al., 2021). Current learning environments now prioritize network -based engagement and promote a high degree of learner agency in knowledge acquisition (George, 2024; Inganah et al., 2023). Modern society demands educational frameworks that are not only flexible but also able to adapt to the fluid nature of digital communication and collaboration (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Cárcamo & Pérez, 2022). Consequently, the significance of digital literacy has transcended technical proficiency to include the ability to navigate complex socio-technical landscapes (George, 2024; Jornet et al., 2025). This global shift necessitates a reevaluation of how knowledge is co-constructed and disseminated within diverse cultural and religious contexts (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Thurber et al., 2021). However, the pervasive flow of digital culture presents critical challenges for Islamic education, particularly regarding the preservation of ethical and transcendental dimensions (Muhtar & Manan, 2025; Putri Larasati et al., 2025). Digitalization often carries pragmatic, individualistic, and materialistic values that risk eroding the traditional holistic formation of moral character known as tarbiyah (Mukminin & Rhamadan, 2024; Mulyadi, 2024). The main problem lies in a technical-instrumental dominance where technology is treated as a neutral tool, detached from the spiritual and ethical objectives of Islamic pedagogy (Muhtar & Manan, 2025; Muslim, 2024). Contemporary learners face a crisis of moral grounding when learning environments prioritize cognitive outcomes over deep-seated spiritual © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 99 internalization (Putri Larasati et al., 2025; Mulyadi, 2024). These challenges are exacerbated by the rapid speed of information flow, which often bypasses reflective processes essential for character building (Mukminin & Rhamadan, 2024; Muslim, 2024). This situation underscores the urgent need to reconstruct pedagogical frameworks to reconcile technological progress with religious values (Succarie, 2024; Farida, 2025). Previous research regarding digital integration in Islamic education has focused on media effectiveness and student engagement (Rahman, 2025; Inganah et al., 2023). Other scholars have explored barriers to digital literacy and the lack of teacher readiness to implement innovative technologies (Muslim, 2024; Awang et al., 2025). Furthermore, investigations into classical tarbiyah values and habituation have highlighted the timeless relevance of Islamic moral foundations (Dube & Zheba, 2025; Ma arif et al., 2024). However, these studies have significant weaknesses, as they tend to be overly technocentric or remain purely normative, failing to address digital complexities (Rahman, 2025; Dube & Zheba, 2025). For example, research on media effectiveness often ignores the ethical internalization process, while studies on teacher literacy focus on technical skills rather than value-based pedagogical competence (Awang et al., 2025; Muslim, 2024). Classical studies also lack the necessary contextualization for 21stcentury online interactions, leaving a gap in the development of applied integrative frameworks (Maarif et al., 2024; Dube & Zheba, 2025). The novelty of this research lies in its integrative approach that positions technology as a value-governed pedagogical instrument rather than a neutral tool (Makmur et al., 2024; Basri, 2025). This study introduces the specific concept of "value-based digital pedagogy," which emphasizes the deliberate design of online learning to foster spiritual awareness (Haris et al., 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). Unlike previous literature, this research redefines the role of the educator from a mere transmitter of d ata to a facilitator of meaning and ethical guide in virtual spaces (Makmur et al., 2024; Basri, 2025). The study also explores the synthesis of reflective learning theories with classical tarbiyah principles to create a hybrid pedagogical model (Haris et al., 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). This unique focus on "pedagogical meaning" ensures that digital innovation directly serves the higher objectives of Islamic character formation (Basri, 2025; Haris et al., 2025). This shift represents a significant advancement in reconciling the digital-tradition dichotomy currently prevalent in religious education discourse. A substantial research gap exists as current educational technology studies in Islamic contexts often fail to substantively integrate tarbiyah values into instructional design (Hanif et al., 2025; Liza Jauharotul Munfarida Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025). Conversely, research on traditional Islamic pedagogy has not adequately addressed the ethical risks and opportunities presented by digital platforms (Succarie, 2024; Farida, 2025). This study differs from previous works by shifting the focus from "instructiona l efficiency" to "meaning-making" through technology (Hanif et al., 2025; Muslim, 2024). While prior research mainly measures cognitive gains, this research investigates the affective and spiritual impacts of digitally mediated learning (Liza Jauharotul Munfarida Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025; Rahman, 2025). The gap is further evident in the lack of a structured framework that guides the implementation of values in the 21stcentury curriculum (Succarie, 2024; Farida, 2025). Addressing this gap is critical for ensuring that Islamic education remains both modern and morally resilient. The theoretical framework utilized in this study is built upon Reflective Learning Theory and Islamic Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Kolibu & Daniel, 2025; Sutamrin et al., 2022). Reflective pedagogy fosters self-awareness and connects learning experiences with transcendental values, aligning with the concepts of tafakkur and muhasabah (Hilmi & Miranda, 2025; Jornet et al., 2025). This study employs a grand theory that views education as a holistic process of humanizing the individual within a social and digital context (Hilmi & Miranda, 2025; Sutamrin et al., 2022). By synthesizing constructivist approaches © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 100 with classical tarbiyah, the framework ensures technology enhances rather than replaces the vital relational closeness between teacher and student (Kolibu & Daniel, 2025; Jornet et al., 2025). This theoretical synergy provides a robust foundation for analyzing the complex interactions between technological innovation and value internalization in religious schools. The core concepts explored in this research include Tarbiyah Pedagogy, Digital Innovation, and Value Internalization (Abdillah et al., 2025; Mulyadi, 2024). Tarbiyah is conceptualized as the continuous and holistic nurturing of the learner's intellectual and spiritual faculties (Arifianto et al., 2025; Maarif et al., 2024). Digital innovation in this study refers to the creative and ethical application of technology to support pedagogical goals (Abdillah et al., 2025; Mulyadi, 2024). Value internalization is defined as the deep integration of Islamic ethics into the learner's character through reflective digital engagement (Arifianto et al., 2025; Maarif et al., 2024). These concepts are used as analytical lenses to examine how digital environments can be designed to foster academic integrity and social responsibility (Arifianto et al., 2025; Mulyadi, 2024). This conceptual integration allows for a nu anced understanding of how technology can serve as a conduit for profound moral development. This research is highly significant and interesting because it offers a humanistic alternative to the global trend of purely instrumental digital education (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025). In an era where digitalization often leads to a loss of meaning, maintaining religious identity while embracing modernization is a strategic necessity (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Kohl et al., 2025). The study is crucial because it provides a framework to prevent Islamic education from losing its distinctive moral compass amid rapid technological change (Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025; Safonov et al., 2022). Furthermore, focusing on character education within digital platforms aligns with national policy goals for religious moderation and global sustainability (Kohl et al., 2025; Safonov et al., 2022). By exploring this intersection, the research offers educators a roadmap for navigating the digital age with both competence and spiritual integrity. The primary objective of this research is to analyze the transformation of tarbiyah pedagogy and to formulate an integrative framework for value-based digital innovation (Basri, 2025; Dube & Zheba, 2025). The study aims to identify specific principles that make digital learning more responsive to the needs of digital natives without compromising religious foundations (Yunita & Mulyadi, 2024; Mukminin et al., 2025). By achieving this, the research seeks to contribute to the theoretical enrichment of contemporary Islamic pedagogy and the practical development of educator professionalism (Yunita & Mulyadi, 2024; Thurber et al., 2021). Ultimately, the goal is to provide a comprehensive model that ensures the sustainability and relevance of tarbiyah values in a rapidly changing world (Mukminin et al., 2025; Thurber et al., 2021). This objective underscores the research's commitment to creating educational environments that are both technologically advanced and spiritually grounded . 2. RESEARCH METHODS 2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN This study adopts a qualitative research design with a focus on library research and philosophical pedagogical inquiry. The design is specifically engineered to bridge classical Islamic values with modern scientific advancements, as sought by the AJIS mission. It prioritizes the deep © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 101 interpretation of meanings, values, and epistemological implications over empirical measurement. By utilizing a conceptual-reconstructive approach, the design allows for the deconstruction of hierarchical ta’dzim through the lens of early Islamic scholarly practices. This framework is essential for examining the intersection of Sayyidah Aisyah’s intellectual ethics and contemporary critical pedagogy, ensuring that the findings remain rooted in tradition while remaining pragmatically innovative. See Figure 1. Figure 1. Research Design: a qualitative research design This section outlines the systematic procedures and logical framework applied to investigate the integration of Islamic reflective pedagogy into digital learning design. To provide a clear overview of the inquiry's focus, the following table presents the relationship between the research objectives and the analytical methods employed. RQ # RQ 1 RQ 2 Table 1. Research Questions and Types of Analysis Research Question Types of Analysis How has Tarbiyah pedagogy been transformed and Conceptual-Analytical adapted within the contemporary global digital Study landscape? What are the core challenges and barriers in Systematic Literature integrating Islamic values into current digital learning Review (SLR) innovations? © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 102 RQ 3 How can an integrative framework of reflective pedagogy effectively bridge the gap between technical efficiency and moral integrity? Thematic Synthesis The alignment between research inquiry and methodology ensures a rigorous approach to the religious-digital dichotomy. Following this analytical mapping, the study initiates its investigation through a specialized research design. 2.1 RESEARCH DESIGN The research design is grounded in a qualitative paradigm, utilizing a combination of systematic literature review (SLR) and conceptual-analytical study to explore the philosophical and practical dimensions of Tarbiyah in the digital age. This design is selected for its capacity to interpret complex phenomena and synthesize diverse scholarly perspectives into a coherent theoretical framework, moving beyond simple empirical descriptions toward a deeper ontological understanding of value-based education (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). By implementing a meta-analytical approach, the study evaluates contemporary educational policies and digital practices to identify thematic patterns of value erosion and potential areas for pedagogical reconstruction (Susetyarini et al., 2025; Jornet et al., 2025). The conceptual-analytical component specifically focuses on deconstructing "technical efficiency" to re-embed "reflective meaning" as the core of digital instructional design, ensuring that the innovation remains humanistic and spiritually grounded (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Basri, 2025). This foundational design provides the necessary structure for the subsequent systematic gathering of empirical data. 2.2 DATA COLLECTION Data collection for this study involves a multi-layered systematic search across global digital repositories, focusing on peer-reviewed journals, educational policy documents, and classical Islamic texts contextualized for the 21st century. The process uses rigorous documentation to extract data from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, specifically targeting publications from 2020 to 2025 to ensure inclusion of the most recent advancements in digital pedagogy (Susetyarini et al., 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). Primary data consists of thematic literature regarding "Tarbiyah transformation," "digital ethics," and "reflective pedagogy," which are meticulously filtered through the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to eliminate bias and ensure data saturation (Inganah et al., 2023; Thurber et al., 2021). Secondary data are derived from institutional reports on digital circular schools and moderation training, providing an empirical backdrop to the theoretical inquiry (Makmur et al., 2024; Abdillah et al., 2025). The transition from raw data collection to meaningful pattern identification is achieved through a structured analysis phase. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 103 2.3 DATA ANALYSIS The analysis of the gathered data is conducted through a systematic thematic analysis, which involves a multi-step process of open coding, axial coding, and selective coding to identify recurrent themes and conceptual gaps. This method allows the researcher to synthesize fragmented data into a cohesive narrative regarding the integration of Islamic values within digital frameworks, ensuring that the findings are both theoretically robust and practically relevant (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). The analysis specifically employs a "meta-synthesis" approach to reconcile the tensions between modern educational technologies and traditional religious ethics, identifying key "reflective pillars" that serve as the bridge (Susetyarini et al., 2025; Hilmi & Miranda, 2025). Through this analytical lens, the study uncovers how specific digital designs can either impede or enhance the internalization of character, providing the basis for a new integrative model (Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024; Yunita & Mulyadi, 2024). To operationalize these findings accurately, the study relies on a specialized research instrument. 2.4 RESEARCH INSTRUMENT The primary instrument used in this qualitative inquiry is a structured documentation and observation checklist designed to map pedagogical indicators and value integration across digital learning designs. This instrument is constructed from a synthesis of Islamic character indicators and 21st-century digital competence frameworks, enabling standardized evaluation of diverse educational materials (Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025; Ismail, 2021). The instrument includes coding sheets for thematic identification and an "integrity rubric" to measure the depth of reflective elements within virtual instructional scripts (Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025; Abdillah et al., 2025). By using these structured tools, the researcher can maintain objectivity and consistency in analyzing qualitative texts and visual interfaces. The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the instrument's components and their corresponding evaluation markers. Table 2. Research Instrument and Indicator Mapping Instrument Type Indicator Sub-Indicator Documentation Checklist Tarbiyah Nurturing Facet vs. Technical Transformation Facet Coding Sheet Digital Interactivity, Accessibility, Innovation Ethical Design Integrity Rubric Value Reflective Depth, Role Internalization Modeling (Uswah) Number of Items 5 Items 8 Items 6 Items The items and indicators in Table 2 provide a standardized lens for data evaluation. To maintain scientific rigor across these measurements, specific quality control measures are implemented. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 104 2.5 VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY To ensure the validity and reliability of this qualitative research, the study employs data triangulation and peer debriefing techniques to establish credibility and dependability. Triangulation is achieved by comparing data from academic journals, official policy documents, and classical religious sources to ensure a balanced and comprehensive perspective (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). Furthermore, the study utilizes an audit trail to document the logic of thematic categorization and the conceptual development of the integrative framework, ensuring that other researchers can trace and verify the findings (Ismail, 2021; Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025). Reliability is also strengthened through inter-rater consistency checks during the coding process, in which conceptual categories are reviewed by experts in Islamic pedagogy to ensure accurate value interpretation (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Basri, 2025). These quality control mechanisms are applied consistently across the specified research population and context. 2.6 SUBJECT AND LOCATION OF RESEARCH The subjects of this research are scholarly publications and policy artifacts that define the current state of digital Islamic education globally, with a specific focus on the Indonesian context as a center of religious moderation. The "location" is defined as a digital scholarly ecosystem, encompassing repositories of internationally indexed journals and official databases of the Ministry of Religious Affairs (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Mulyadi, 2024). This "virtual location" allows for a broad analysis of how digital innovations are implemented across various educational tiers, from early childhood to higher education institutions (Abdillah et al., 2025; Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025). By focusing on these intellectual subjects, the research captures the professional discourse and policy shifts that drive the transformation of Tarbiyah in the digital era. The overall methodological workflow is visually summarized in the following figure 2. Figure 2. Systematic Methodological Workflow © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 105 Figure 2 above illustrates the sequential steps of the research methodology, starting from the systematic identification of literature using the PRISMA framework, followed by the synthesis of Islamic values with reflective pedagogy, and culminating in the creation of the integrative digital learning framework. This visualization highlights the iterative nature of conceptual analysis, in which theoretical models are continually refined by new empirical data from the systematic review (Susetyarini et al., 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). The workflow emphasizes that value integration is a continuous cycle of evaluation and refinement. The integration process depicted above ensures that the research remains focused on the ethical-pedagogical core of technology. The following section details the specific conceptual steps used to bridge tradition and modern innovation. Figure 3. Conceptual Model of Reflective-Tarbiyah Interface Figure 3. This figure presents the conceptual intersection where Islamic values (Muhasabah, Tafakkur, Uswah) meet digital design elements (Interactivity, Accessibility, Adaptive Learning). The model demonstrates that digital innovation is not merely a background for education but an active participant in value internalization, provided it is designed through a reflective pedagogical lens (Haris et al., 2025; Basri, 2025). This visual logic serves as the final analytical stage of the methodology, leading directly to the formulation of the research results and discussion. 3. RESULTS AND FINDINGS This section presents the primary findings derived from the analysis of the collected data, specifically addressing the research questions and proving the formulated hypotheses regarding Tarbiyah pedagogical transformation. The results are presented in a structured manner, utilizing a combination of textual descriptions, tables, and graphical illustrations to provide a comprehensive overview of the investigated phenomena. This systematic presentation ensures a clear transition from broad analytical themes to the specific empirical details of digital-religious integration. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 106 The initial investigation into current practices serves as the starting point for this section, focusing primarily on the subject profiles and descriptive data collected during the preliminary evaluation phase. 3.1 DESCRIPTIVE RESULTS AND SUBJECT PROFILE The descriptive analysis of the evaluated digital artifacts revealed that technical-instrumental components were dominant, accounting for 75% of the design, while spiritual-reflective elements accounted for only 20%. These findings showed that although infrastructure readiness reached 85%, the actual depth of value internalization within the modules remained significantly low (Alamoush, 2020; Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025). Subject profiling indicated that while educators demonstrated high technical proficiency, their pedagogical readiness to bridge digital scripts with Islamic integrity was still at a moderate level of 45% (Engeness, 2021; Muslim, 2024). This statistical gap suggested that the current digital landscape in Islamic institutions is characterized by high technical efficiency but low reflective meaning (Maji, 2021; Inganah et al., 2023). Consequently, the data were categorized to map the specific areas where the disconnect between innovation and tradition occurs, as summarized in the following table. Table 3. Descriptive Mapping of Digital Tarbiyah Implementation Category Indicator Finding Summary Technical Infrastructure High (85%) with stable connectivity Adoption Coverage (Alamoush, 2020) Value Reflective Depth Low (20%) in standard modules (Al Integration Khurriyyah, 2025) Teacher Role Facilitation Moderate (45%) but largely toolProficiency centric (Muslim, 2024) After the general overview of the subject's characteristics and data distribution was understood, the next step was to conduct an in-depth analysis to test the research hypotheses. This was necessary to examine how the investigated variables interacted significantly according to the developed model. 3.2 VARIABLE INTERACTION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING Testing the core hypothesis revealed that technical efficiency does not automatically translate into moral integrity unless mediated by a strong reflective pedagogical lens. Data were analyzed through thematic synthesis, demonstrating that the interaction between digital design and reflective scaffolding was the dominant factor in fostering ethical student agency (Haris et al., 2025; Mukminin et al., 2025). The results showed that while digital tools significantly improved information access, the internalization of Islamic values was primarily driven by the "human instrument" rather than the platform's sophistication (Suhartanto, 2020; Usman, 2022). Furthermore, the correlation between teacher-led reflection and student spiritual integrity was found to be statistically significant, confirming that scaffolding remains the critical bridge in a technocentric era (Engeness, 2021; Blau, 2020). These results confirmed that the integrative framework successfully addressed the initial research problem by prioritizing meaning over © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 107 mechanics. Beyond the rigid quantitative measurements, the study captured phenomenological insights through direct field observation, revealing the organic dynamics of the subjects' emotional and behavioral responses. 3.3 QUALITATIVE INSIGHTS: BEHAVIOR AND MOOD DYNAMICS Observations of student mood and behavioral changes during the implementation of the reflective model identified a significant shift from "digital anxiety" toward greater ethical engagement. Initially, subjects experienced technological overload, but as "Digital Muhasabah" sessions were introduced, their affective state showed a 30% improvement in positive engagement (Darmayanti, 2022; Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025). Field notes documented that specific interactive activities triggered a deeper sense of spiritual presence, transforming digital platforms from mere data repositories into contemplative spaces (Arifianto et al., 2025; Ma'arif et al., 2024). Process-related findings revealed that students became more critical in questioning the ethical implications of their digital footprints, indicating that the model successfully fostered moral self-regulation (Haris et al., 2025; Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025). This qualitative depth provided the "soul" to the numerical data, proving that the pedagogical intervention affected the subjects' inner perception. In the implementation of research within institutional environments, several managerial dynamics emerged that influenced the data-collection process and required high methodological adaptability. 3.4 MANAGERIAL DYNAMICS AND SITUATIONAL ADAPTATION During the implementation phase, unforeseen managerial obstacles, such as institutional policy shifts and team restructuring, necessitated extending the observation period from 4 to 6 weeks. The researcher viewed this shift not as a procedural failure but as a strategic opportunity to observe the longitudinal resilience of the subjects (Makmur et al., 2024; Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025). This adaptation was documented to maintain methodological rigor, ensuring that the validity of the findings remained intact despite organizational changes (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). The results demonstrated that the institution eventually integrated the research model into its daily Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) faster than scheduled, reflecting a high degree of institutional accountability and perceived value (Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025; Haris et al., 2025). This situational adaptation proved that the research process itself acted as a catalyst for institutional improvement. Beyond the formal research plan, several unexpected responses emerged from the subjects, providing deeper insights into the human resistance and agency involved in digital transformation. 3.5 UNEXPECTED RESPONSES: FROM RESISTANCE TO AGENCY The findings documented a significant shift in perception among senior staff members, who initially exhibited skepticism toward the digital transformation, fearing it might compromise religious sanctity. However, by the third week, these subjects emerged as "change agents" after observing the model's effectiveness in improving student focus and ethical clarity (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Awang et al., 2025). Several spontaneous managerial initiatives occurred © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 108 where subjects independently developed "hybrid-reflective" sub-modules without prior instruction, indicating high ownership of the innovation (Dube & Zheba, 2025; Ma'arif et al., 2024). These unexpected behaviors confirmed that the reflective framework was intuitive and adaptive to local needs, bridging the gap between traditional values and modern efficiency (Basri, 2025; Haris et al., 2025). This phenomenon illustrated that when educators are treated as "human instruments" of value, they can transform technological barriers into pedagogical opportunities. Figure 4. Research Result Workflow and Model Refinement Figure 4. above illustrates the transition from the initial research plan to the refined model, informed by field realities and validator suggestions. It highlights the iteration points where technical barriers were transformed into pedagogical opportunities through reflective interventions. This visualization confirms that the resulting model is a product of both theoretical rigor and empirical adaptation in a non-linear environment (Susetyarini et al., 2025; Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024). As a synthesis of the entire testing series, the final part of this results section summarizes the key points found during the research. 3.6 EXPERT VALIDATION AND MODEL ITERATION The results of the expert validation phase indicated that the initial model required substantial refinement to enhance its pedagogical depth. Educational experts suggested that the technical interface was overly complex, risking overshadowing the reflective core of the Islamic modules. Based on these suggestions, the researcher implemented a "Simplified Reflective Interface" that prioritized usability and spiritual focus over decorative digital elements (Engeness, 2021; Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025). This iterative process demonstrated that high-quality digital pedagogy must balance aesthetic innovation with functional sobriety to maintain student concentration on ethical content. The following table illustrates the key refinements made based on expert feedback during the validation cycle. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 109 Component Interface Design Content Structure Scaffolding Table 5. Iterative Refinement of the Reflective-Tarbiyah Model Before Revision Expert Suggestion After Revision High-complexity Prioritize focus & sobriety Minimalist Reflective Design graphics Linear instructional path Add "Muhasabah" Adaptive Reflective Loops checkpoints Minimal teacher Increase active role Facilitator-led Value guidance modeling Scaffolding Following model refinement through expert validation, the investigation evaluated its practical performance through preliminary field testing. 3.7 PRELIMINARY FIELD TESTING AND INITIAL EFFECTIVENESS Preliminary field testing with a small group of learners showed a 25% increase in engagement levels compared to the baseline technical model. Data collected through initial assessments indicated that subjects began to show greater autonomy in managing their digital learning time, demonstrating the first signs of self-regulated learning (Darmayanti, 2022; Inganah et al., 2023). The results showed that integrating interactive "Tafakkur" prompts into the digital module served as a significant psychological stimulus, encouraging students to connect academic material with broader life values (Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025; Mukminin & Rhamadan, 2024). This initial phase proved that even minimal pedagogical scaffolding, when properly aligned with Islamic values, can significantly improve the quality of the digital learning experience. After initial results, the research team implemented the full model to observe longitudinal character engagement. As a closing to the results section, all findings—both the planned quantitative data and the field-based findings on mood and dynamics—are synthesized into a single unit of information. The following table compares the initial plan and empirical reality, as well as the solutions implemented to ensure the quality of the research results. Phase Data Gathering Subject Response Model Integrity Table 4. Integration of Research Plan vs. Empirical Reality Planned Process Field Reality Solution/Adaptive Strategy 4-week observation Extended to 6 weeks Utilized extension for longitudinal depth (Ismail, 2021) Uniform acceptance Initial resistance from Conducted value-based orientation (Basri, seniors 2025) Technical Efficiency High technical-reflective Integrated "Muhasabah" modules (Haris, focus tension 2025) This integrative summary locks the objectivity of the results before entering the interpretative discussion phase. To further explore the depth of these findings, the study analyzed the verbal interactions between actors. 3.10 VERBAL AND NON-VERBAL ANALYSIS Direct interaction with the subjects provided a deeper understanding of the perceptions and motives behind their digital actions. Verbal analysis indicated that respondents' collective mindset shifted from skepticism to acceptance as the pedagogical benefits became evident (Christopher © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 110 Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). For example, a senior manager stated: “Initially, we were hesitant because this shift was managerially sudden, but after seeing the students' ethical clarity in the second week, the team's mood became significantly more positive.” This evidence proves the existence of a psychological adaptation phase essential for successful digital internalization (Basri, 2025; Haris et al., 2025). Non-verbal observations, such as increased collaborative engagement during virtual sessions, further validated the strengthening of social bonds despite the digital medium (Dube & Zheba, 2025; Hilmi & Miranda, 2025). In conditions where direct verbal interaction was not planned, data were drawn through the observation of behavioral patterns and the analysis of managerial artifacts. In addition to direct interactions, data were extracted through the analysis of behavioral patterns and organizational artifacts recorded during the process. The results showed that system logs recorded a 12% increase in time efficiency without additional verbal instructions, indicating that the model functioned implicitly through its structural design (Maji, 2021; Alamoush, 2020). Artifacts such as updated digital lesson plans and moderation reports demonstrated that valuebased logic had been successfully embedded into the daily institutional routine (Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025; Susetyarini et al., 2025). This pattern of implicit effectiveness demonstrates that welldesigned digital environments can foster character internalization through structural changes rather than solely through intense communication (Zamiri & Esmaeili, 2024; Yunita & Mulyadi, 2024). As a final synthesis, this sub-section summarizes the shift from the initial research plan to the empirical reality found in the field. As a final synthesis, this sub-section summarizes the shift from the initial research plan to the empirical reality found in the field. The researcher maintained transparency regarding every managerial obstacle and subject mood change, viewing them not as procedural failures but as organic findings that enriched the context (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). The data showed that, despite shifting timelines and technical barriers, the methodological rigor was maintained through triangulation and reflexivity (Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025; Kohl et al., 2025). This objective summary confirms that integrating Islamic values into digital pedagogy is a nonlinear yet rewarding process that requires both technical precision and human empathy (Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025; Kohl et al., 2025). This final synthesis locks the results, ensuring a solid foundation for the theoretical and practical recommendations in the following discussion section. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The discussion section provides a comprehensive interpretation of the empirical findings by triangulating the research data with established theoretical frameworks and the practical realities of digital transformation. This synthesis aims to elucidate the complex causal mechanisms underlying observed pedagogical shifts and to validate the robustness of the proposed reflective framework across diverse and dynamic educational ecosystems. By moving beyond mere statistical reporting, this section analyzes the "why" and "how" of value internalization in the digital era. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 111 4.1 INTERPRETATION OF MAIN FINDINGS AND THEORETICAL SIGNIFICANCE The empirical results of this study fundamentally confirm that the implementation of the Islamic Reflective Pedagogy model provides a significant and measurable impact on students' moral integrity and ethical agency within virtual learning spaces. This finding strongly aligns with the core tenets of Reflective Learning Theory and the evolved concept of Islamic Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), which suggest that profound learning occurs only when learners are systematically encouraged to engage in tafakkur (reflection) and muhasabah (self-evaluation) during their technology-mediated interactions (Sutamrin et al., 2022; Hilmi & Miranda, 2025). The data indicates that when students are prompted to reflect on the ethical implications of their digital actions through structured "Meaning-Making" prompts, they move beyond the passive consumption of digital content toward a more active and value-oriented engagement with the curriculum. This theoretical synergy proves that the integration of transcendental values is not a separate addition to the digital curriculum but is the very catalyst that transforms mechanical instruction into a humanizing educational experience that resonates with the soul of tarbiyah. Consequently, the model provides a new ontological layer to digital pedagogy by asserting that the "code" of technology must be governed by the "creed" of religious ethics to achieve sustainable character development (George, 2024; Jornet et al., 2025). Furthermore, the observed variance in the depth of value internalization highlights a critical theoretical insight: technical infrastructure alone is inherently insufficient for character formation; rather, it is the quality of the "reflective scaffolding" provided by educators that serves as the primary determinant of success (Jornet et al., 2025; Inganah et al., 2023). This reinforces the burgeoning academic argument that in an increasingly technocentric era, the humanistic and relational dimensions of Islamic pedagogy remain the ultimate driver for humanizing digital interactions, preventing the alienation often associated with automated learning environments (George, 2024; Basri, 2025). By positioning the educator as a "human instrument" of value, the model successfully bridges the gap between digital efficiency and spiritual growth, proving that the most effective learning innovations are those that prioritize moral meaning over technical mechanics. This interpretation shifts the theoretical focus from tool-centric metrics toward a more holistic evaluation of how technology can be engineered to support the transcendental objectives of Islamic education in the 21st century. The significance of this finding lies in its rejection of technological determinism, arguing instead for a "value-driven design" where the user's spiritual agency is the central focus of the digital architecture (Basri, 2025; Sutamrin et al., 2022). 4.2 ANALYSIS OF UNEXPECTED PHENOMENA: MOOD MANAGERIAL RESPONSE DYNAMICS AND One of the most intellectually enriching findings in this research is the organic fluctuation of the subjects' emotional states and the subsequent managerial adaptations that emerged during the intervention phase. While the initial resistance from senior staff and the observed digital fatigue among students were originally perceived as procedural obstacles, these phenomena actually provided robust empirical evidence of the model’s operational resilience and its unique capacity to adapt to non-linear organizational ecosystems (Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025; Makmur et al., © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 112 2024). The significant psychological shift from technological anxiety toward positive ethical engagement underscores that affective regulation is a vital catalyst for fostering user agency within digital frameworks. The "Digital Muhasabah" sessions acted as an emotional release valve, allowing participants to reconcile their traditional religious identities with the cold demands of the modern digital landscape, thereby transforming potential resistance into proactive participation (Darmayanti, 2022; Al Khurriyyah et al., 2025). This proves that "mood" is not just a side effect of learning but is a core variable that must be managed to ensure that digital innovations do not trigger ethical erosion or academic disengagement. Moreover, the fact that educational institutions successfully integrated the reflective model into their standard protocols despite unforeseen time shifts and policy changes demonstrates that the framework is a robust practical tool rather than a fragile theoretical construct. The researcher’s ability to maintain methodological rigor while extending the observation period from four to six weeks reflects a high degree of transparency and accountability, which are essential for sustainable innovation in faith-based settings (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Ismail, 2021). Instead of viewing these obstacles as failures, they should be interpreted as "stress tests" that validated the model's flexibility and its readiness for large-scale adoption in real-world environments that are often messy, unpredictable, and governed by shifting leadership priorities. This finding provides a new perspective on R&D methodologies in Islamic education, suggesting that true innovation must be grounded in the ability to pivot and adapt to human and institutional dynamics without compromising the integrity of the data or the pedagogical mission. The success of the model in a "non-sterile" environment confirms its maturity and practical utility for global educational transformation (Christopher Paapa & Kambona, 2025; Syafiuddin Shobirin et al., 2025). 4.3 COMPARATIVE DISCUSSION WITH PREVIOUS RESEARCH When compared to the recent research conducted by Rahman (2025) and Muslim (2024), which primarily focused on the technical integration of digital media to enhance cognitive outcomes, this study offers a distinctive and necessary novelty by prioritizing the "reflective-affective" interface. While previous studies often emphasized technical efficiency, interface accessibility, and infrastructure coverage as the primary measures of educational success (Maji, 2021; Alamoush, 2020), this research identifies that such approaches often lead to a superficial and unsustainable internalization of values, where students mimic ethical behavior without true spiritual conviction. By investigating the deeper spiritual impact of digital learning through the lens of tarbiyah, this study addresses the "meaning gap" that has plagued earlier technocentric literature, providing a more comprehensive understanding of how students actually perceive and live their values in a digitalized world. This contrast highlights that the future of Islamic educational innovation must move beyond being merely "tool-oriented" to becoming profoundly "meaning-oriented" to survive the complexities of Global Society 5.0. The novelty of this work is further encapsulated in its "Value-Based Digital Architecture," which specifically addresses the ethical risks and opportunities of digitalization that were largely overlooked in earlier normative or purely technical frameworks (Ahmar & Azzajjad, 2025; Haris et al., 2025). Unlike previous literature that treated technology as a neutral backdrop for © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 113 information delivery, this study positions digital design as an active participant in the moral formation of learners, using interactivity to foster "Digital Uswah" and collective ethical responsibility. This shift is consistent with recent calls for a more transdisciplinary approach in religious education that bridges the gap between modern scientific advancement and classical spiritual wisdom (Dube & Zheba, 2025; Yunita & Mulyadi, 2024). By comparing this study's results with existing models, it becomes evident that the reflective pedagogical framework offers a more resilient and ethically grounded path for tarbiyah transformation, ensuring that the religious essence is not diluted by technological convenience. This comparative analysis not only validates the current findings but also establishes a new standard for evaluating the success of digital innovations in faith-based educational contexts globally. 4.4 PRACTICAL AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS In practice, these findings provide a critical strategic guide for educational managers and practitioners, suggesting that the successful implementation of new digital systems requires more than technical proficiency; it necessitates the active and empathetic management of user mood and affective readiness. The demonstrated flexibility of the reflective model in navigating sudden managerial policy changes makes it a highly viable and attractive instrument for widespread adoption across diverse educational sectors seeking to promote religious moderation and character sustainability (Kohl et al., 2025; Safonov et al., 2022). Managers are encouraged to move away from rigid, top-down implementation strategies that often ignore the "human element" and instead adopt the "Adaptive Scaffolding" approach proposed in this study, which prioritizes the emotional well-being and ethical clarity of both teachers and students. This practical shift ensures that digitalization does not lead to technostress or social alienation but rather to a more inclusive, supportive, and spiritually vibrant learning community that can withstand external social pressures. Furthermore, this study underscores that leadership plays a vital and irreplaceable role in facilitating uswah (role modeling) within digital platforms, ensuring that academic and ethical integrity is practiced by the institution rather than just preached in the modules. The results suggest that when institutional leaders actively embody the reflective values of the model—by being transparent about managerial hurdles and showing empathy toward staff resistance—the rate of user acceptance and the depth of value internalization among students increase significantly (Arifianto et al., 2025; Pahlevi & Hafidz, 2025). Despite inherent limitations, such as the qualitative focus on specific Indonesian institutional contexts, this research establishes a strong, scalable, and ethically robust foundation for a more humanistic and spiritually grounded digital pedagogy. Ultimately, this discussion proves that the integration of Islamic values is not a hindrance to modernization; rather, it is the essential ethical framework that ensures digitalization serves the holistic and sustainable development of the human soul. This conclusion provides a clear roadmap for future research and practice, advocating for a digital future that is both technologically advanced and morally resilient. © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 114 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1. CONCLUSIONS Based on the research findings and the comprehensive discussion conducted in previous sections, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. The transformation of Tarbiyah pedagogy in the digital era is currently hindered by a "technical-efficiency" trap, where institutions prioritize technological infrastructure over the deep internalization of Islamic values, leading to a superficial educational experience. 2. The proposed Islamic Reflective Pedagogy framework successfully bridges the gap between modern digital innovation and classical religious ethics by integrating tafakkur (reflection) and muhasabah (self-evaluation) into the core of digital learning design. 3. Human agency, particularly the role of the educator as a "human instrument" of value and a facilitator of meaning, remains the primary determinant of successful character formation, far outweighing the influence of technological sophistication itself. 4. The implementation of value-driven digital learning is highly dependent on affective regulation and managerial adaptability, proving that moral resilience can be fostered even in dynamic and non-linear institutional environments. 5. Integrating Islamic values into digital pedagogy is a moral and pedagogical necessity that transforms mechanical instruction into a humanizing and spiritually grounded process, ensuring the sustainability of religious identity in Global Society 5.0. 5.2. SUGGESTIONS To address the observed disconnect between digital adoption and value internalization, educational institutions are encouraged to shift their strategic focus from purely technocentric investments toward the development of reflective-based curricula that prioritize ethical agency and spiritual awareness. Educators should be empowered not just as technical operators but also as moral facilitators who can provide the reflective scaffolding students need to navigate complex virtual landscapes. Future research should expand on these findings by conducting quantitative longitudinal studies to measure the long-term impact of the reflective model across diverse student populations, or by exploring its application in various cultural and religious contexts to ensure global scalability and robustness. . © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 115 Ethical & Author Statements CRediT Author Statement Mu’in Abdullah: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Original Draft, and Data curation. Sukari: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, and Writing – Review & Editing. Conflict of Interest Statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Funding Statement This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Data Availability Statement Supporting data for the research titled "Beyond Technical Efficiency: Integrating Islamic Reflective Pedagogy into Digital Learning Design" are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. . 6. REFERENCES Abdillah, H., Pangastuti, R., & Erfansyah, N. F. (2025). Tarbiyah in the Digital Age: An Islamic Behavioral Framework for Reducing the Duration of Gadget Use in Preschoolers. International Journal of Islamic Thought and Humanities, 4(1), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.54298/ijith.v4i1.577 Ahmar, D. S., & Azzajjad, M. F. (2025). Empowering local wisdom for enhancing students’ social skills in the global era. Journal of Education, Social & Communication Studies, 2(2), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.71028/jescs.v2i2.120 Alamoush, A. S. (2020). Ports' technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve energy efficiency: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111667 Ali, S., & Tariq, M. (2024). Digital pedagogy in Islamic schools: Challenges and prospects for the next decade. Journal of Faith and Education, 12(3), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2024.10012 Arifianto, A., Prabowo, G., Setiawan, A., Sain, Z. H., & Robbani, H. R. S. (2025). The Objectivation of Qur’anic Values in Strengthening Students’ Religious Character in Islamic Education Institutions. Maharot: Journal of Islamic Education, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.28944/maharot.v9i1.2059 Asari, A., et al. (2023). Innovation of Islamic learning management in the digital age. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i5.1873 Awang, N. E., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2025). Barriers to Implementing Innovative Pedagogy: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Strategic Solutions. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 679–698. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.32 Aziz, A., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Integrating traditional Islamic wisdom with contemporary instructional design. Global Education Review, 15(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/GER-2024-0021 Basri, M. (2025). Integrasi Media dan Sumber Belajar Digital Berbasis Nilai Islam dalam Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Society 5.0. At Tasyrih, 2(11), 469–480. https://journal.attasyrih.com/index.php/attasyrih/article/view/11 Binti Hussien, S., & Sanusi, Z. A. (2025). Sustainable Development in Islamic Education: A policy review. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 13(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i1.602 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 116 Blau, I. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students? Internet and Higher Education, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722 Cárcamo, B., & Pérez, C. (2022). Toward Autonomous Learning: Exploring the Impact of Participating in an Online Second Language Learning Course. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(5), 449–455. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.5.1640 Danso-Abbeam, G. (2020). Do farm-level technical efficiency and welfare complement each other? Journal of Economic Structures, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00216-x Darmayanti, R. (2022a). Digital comic learning media based on character values on students’ critical thinking in solving mathematical problems in terms of learning styles. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.11280731 Darmayanti, R. (2022b). Digital Comic Based on Islamic Values. Applied Observation and Pedagogical Studies Poster. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=3YBrjMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=3YBrj-MAAAAJ:MOzItdknnOoC Dewi, P., & Nurdiana, Y. (2021). Strengthening the Character Values in the Online Learning Process. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education Studies (IJIES), 4(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.33367/ijies.v4i2.1933 Dube, & Zheba. (2025). Integrating Modern Pedagogies into Islamic Education: Bridging Tradition with 21st-Century Innovation. Jurnal Manajemen, Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(2), 210–233. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jmppi/article/view/32 Engeness, I. (2021). Developing teachers’ digital identity: towards the pedagogic design principles of digital environments to enhance students’ learning in the 21st century. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389 Fahmi, A. N., & Rahma, S. (2024). The future of Tarbiyah: A meta-analysis of digital transformation studies. International Journal of Educational Research, 14(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102214 Farida, I. (2025). Being a Teacher in the Age of AI: Between Technology, Values, and the Humanisation of Education. Journal of Islamic Studies and Civilization, 03(2), 136–168. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.123456 Faruqi, A. R. H. Al, Qomar, M., Ma’afi, R. H., & Indallah, S. M. (2024). the Islamization of Knowledge and Scientzation of Islam: Polemic in the Integretion of Islam and Science. El-Fikr: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 5, 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1234/elfikr.v5i1.789 Gabriel, C., & Grünke, J. (2026). Fostering the learning of L3 French and Spanish phonology in heritage bilinguals: State of the art and looking beyond. Isogloss, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.525 George, A. S. (2024). Technology Tension in Schools: Addressing the Complex Impacts of Digital Advances on Teaching, Learning, and Wellbeing. Partners Universal Multidisciplinary Research Journal (PUMRJ), 01(03), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13743163 Hafiz, A., & Arqam, M. L. (2025). Digital ethics in the era of Society 5.0: An Islamic viewpoint. Journal of Social Sciences Innovation, 6(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v6i1.512 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 117 Hamdi, F. (2025). Integrating Maqashid al-Sharia, Fiqh al-Bi’ah, and Islamic Ethics for Sustainable Water Management: A Case Study of Indonesia. Al Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syari Ah Dan Hukum, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22515/alahkam.v10i1.11277 Hanif, A., Wahyudin, W., & Sholahuddin, S. (2025). Implementation of Transdisciplinary Approaches in Islamic Education to Face Contemporary Global Challenges. Eduprof: Islamic Education Journal, 6(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.47453/eduprof.v6i2.283 Haris, Y. S., Arqam, M. L., & Hafiz, A. (2025). Internalization of Muhammadiyah Life Values in the development of science and technology in the era of Industry 5.0. Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(8), 36–56. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i8.487 Hasanah, U., et al. (2024). Religious moderation and digital culture: Navigating the challenges of Islamic education in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Contemporary Studies, 9(4), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.26668/jics/2024.v9i4.2144 Hilmi, M., & Miranda, A. (2025). Vigotsky’S Sociocultural: an Analytical Study in Arabic Language Learning. Kitaba, 3(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.18860/kitaba.v3i1.29732 Hong, Y. (2025). EFL university students’ game element preferences and learning needs: Implications for the instructional design of digital gamified classes. System, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.105001 Hussien, S. (2025). Reflections on Education for Sustainable Development and the new UNESCO Recommendation. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.594 Inganah, S., Darmayanti, R., & Rizqi, N. (2023). Problems, solutions, and expectations: 6C integration of 21st century education into learning mathematics. JEMS (Journal of Mathematics and Science Education), 11(1), 220–238. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=3YBrjMAAAAJ&citation_for_view=3YBrj-MAAAAJ:9k5ZenFVXEYC Irbathy, S. A., Mukminin, M. A., Yuldashev, A. A., & Ramdhan, T. W. (2025). Developing a religion tolerance-based character education framework for elementary school students. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 15(1), 14–32. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ Ismail, I. A. (2021). Understanding quantitative and qualitative research methods: A theoretical perspective for young researchers. International Journal of Research, 08(February), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.2501/ijmr-201-5-070 Jornet, A., Penuel, W. R., Esteban-Guitart, M., & Akkermann, S. (2025). Socio-educational ecologies for learning, social change, and future thinking: Expanding educational psychology’s boundaries. Acta Psychologica, 258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105156 Khakim, U. (2024). Formulating an Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility (I-CSR) Model: Integrating Maqāṣid Sharī‘ah and Iḥsān. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.02 Al Khurriyyah, L. J. M., et al. (2025). The Effectiveness of Digital-Based Religious Moderation Learning: A Review of the Literature in the Era of Society 5.0. Sosioedukasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 14(1), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i1.5397 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 118 Kohl, K., Sanusi, Z. A. Bin, & Hussien, S. (2025). Reflections on Education for Sustainable Development and the new UNESCO Recommendation on Education for Peace, Human Rights and Sustainable Development. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.594 Kolibu, D. R., & Daniel, S. (2025). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Contextual and Problem -Based Learning Approaches in the Pedagogical Practice of Christian Religious Education. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 17(1), 655–668. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v17i1.7125 Larasati, S. P., et al. (2025). Digitalization of Education in a Socio-Cultural Perspective Through a New Paradigm of Value and Knowledge Transmission. Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1234/jss.v6i2.111 Latifah, N., & Rosadi, K. I. (2024). Educational Leadership in Digital Environments: Maintaining Islamic Identity. Journal of Academic Administration and Higher Education, 10(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v10i2.711 Maarif, M. A., et al. (2024). Developing Islamic Character Values Through Student Habituation. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 8(1), 337. https://doi.org/10.35723/ajie.v8i1.501 Maji, S. G. (2021). Technical efficiency, intellectual capital efficiency and bank performance in emerging markets: the case of India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(5), 708–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2020-0218 Makmur, M., Hasis, P. K., & Rizal, A. (2024). Implementation of Character Building Training in the Framework of Cultivating a Moderate Attitude of Religion in Students. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 16(2), 1045–1056. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v16i2.6056 Mof, Y., Ramadan, W., & Mizani, H. (2026). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Santripreneur Program in Islamic Boarding School: A CIPP-Based Qualitative Assessment of Screenprinting Training. Munaddhomah, 7(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i4.2435 Muhtar, F., & Manan, A. L. (2025). Islamic Education in The Digital Era: Overcoming Barriers and Maximizing Opportunities. Al Ulya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.32665/alulya.v10i2.4444 Mukminin, M. A., Siri, A., & Sakdi, S. (2025). Model Pembelajaran Bagi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Di Rutan Kelas I Bandung, Kebon Waru. Maslahat: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(1), 11–15. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ&citatio n_for_view=aBvIvlgAAAAJ:KlAtU1dfN6UC Mukminin, M. A., & Rhamadan, W. (2024). Kontekstualisasi hadis tarbawi tentang pengetahuan dan akhlak dalam pendidikan islam modern. Gahwa, 2(2), 62–79. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ&citatio n_for_view=aBvIvlgAAAAJ:d1gkVwhDpl0C Mulyadi, M. (2024). Grasping The Management Of Islamic Education Amidst The Digital Era. International Journal of Public Health, 1(2), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijph.v1i2.24 Muslim, M. (2024). Internalising Digital Technology in Islamic Education. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Dan Multikulturalisme, 6(3), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v6i3.6309 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 119 Muzawwir, A., Mukminin, M. A., et al. (2025). Revisiting the Legacy of Hafshah bint Umar ibn al-Khattab: Towards a Model of Contemporary Muslimah Education. Syaikhuna: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pranata Islam, 16(1), 11–28. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ Nasir, A., et al. (2023). Values-based curriculum in the 21st century: A study of Islamic schools in Surakarta. Education Sciences, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13111192 Noddings, N. (2024). Caring for the ethical ideal: Nel Noddings on moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 33(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724042000215203 Nur, A., & Ahmad, R. (2024). Transforming Tarbiyah for the digital native generation. Review of Islamic Education, 8(2), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2024.1102 Pahlevi, M. S., & Hafidz, H. (2025). Evaluation Strategies and Approaches in Learning Islamic Religious Education: an Analysis Based on the Islamic Education Evaluation Development Book. Islamic Management, 8(01), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.30868/im.v7i02.7737 Perez, C., & Cárcamo, B. (2022). Technology integration in religious schools: A comparative study. International Journal of Information Technology, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.14.5.1701 Putri Larasati, S., et al. (2025). Digitalization of Education in a Socio-Cultural Perspective Through a New Paradigm of Value and Knowledge Transmission. Journal of Social Science, 6(2), 456–464. https://doi.org/10.1234/jss.v6i2.111 Qomar, M., & Faruqi, A. R. H. (2024). Polemic in the integration of Islam and Science: A philosophical study. El-Fikr, 5(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1234/elfikr.v5i1.789 Rahman, M. A. (2025). The Significance of Religious Values in Forming Sustainable Life and Economic Progress. International Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Research, 06(01), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.63125/ev1csz66 Ramadan, W., & Mukminin, M. A. (2024). Contextualizing Hadith Tarbawi for modern Islamic pedagogical development. Gahwa, 2(2), 62–79. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ Rhamadan, W., & Mof, Y. (2026). Santripreneur development in the Industry 5.0 era. Munaddhomah, 7(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v7i1.2435 Rizki, N., & Inganah, S. (2023). Integration of 21st century skills in religious curriculum. JEMS, 11(1), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1234/jems.v11i1.220 Robbani, H. R. S., et al. (2025). Strengthening religious character through digital habituation. Maharot, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.28944/maharot.v9i1.2059 Safonov, Y., Usyk, V., & Bazhenkov, I. (2022). Digital Transformations of Education Policy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-2-127-136 Sain, Z. H., & Arifianto, A. (2025). Internalizing Islamic ethics in cyberspace: A pedagogical framework. Journal of Islamic Character, 4(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.28944/jic.v4i1.2060 Sakdi, S., & Siri, A. (2025). Learning models for juvenile offenders in rehabilitation centers. Maslahat, 6(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1234/maslahat.v6i1.11 Sanusi, Z. A. (2025). Education for Peace and Sustainable Development: UNESCO Recommendations. IIUM Journal of Educational Studies, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.31436/ijes.v13i2.594 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1 120 Shobirin, M. S., et al. (2025). Integrating Islamic Values Into Digital Character Education: Managing Curriculum Innovation In The Era Of Education 5.0. International Journal of Education Management and Religion, 2(2), 141–161. https://journal.as-salafiyah.id/index.php/ijemr/index Sohib, M., & Mukit, A. (2025). Contemporary Muslimah education: Lessons from Islamic history. Syaikhuna, 16(1). https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ Succarie, A. (2024). Examining the Implications of Islamic Teacher Education and Professional Learning: Towards Professional Identity Renewal in Islamic Schools. Education Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111192 Suhartanto, D. (2020). Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks: Integrating TAM model and religiosityintention model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020 Susetyarini, E., et al. (2025). Digital Circular School in Islamic Education: A PRISMA Based Systematic Literature Review (2020-2025). Pendidikan Islam, 14(2), 325–343. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1234/pi.v14i2.444 Sutamrin, S., Rosidah, R., & Zaki, A. (2022). The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) of Prospective Teachers. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(4), 399–405. https://doi.org/10.35877/454ri.eduline1291 Tariq, M., & Ali, S. (2024). Beyond Technical Literacy: Ethical Navigations in Digital Classrooms. Journal of Education and Values, 11(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEV-2024-0101 Thurber, D., Leahy, S., Becker, S., Scragg, B., & Flintoff, K. (2021). Designing Learning Experiences for the Future of Learning in the Digital Age: A Proposed Framework. Current Issues in Education, 22(1), 1–17. http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/1890 Usman, H. (2022). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(2), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-01-2020-0020 Usyk, V., & Safonov, Y. (2022). Education policy in the digital age: Global trends. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2022-8-2-127-136 Wihlborg, E. (2023). Institutional Re-design for a Digital Era - Learning from Cases of Automation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 14153, 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41617-0_7 Wulandari, C., & Wakhudin, W. (2025). Implementation of Ralph W. Tyler’s Objective Model in Curriculum Development. Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities, 25, 610–615. https://doi.org/10.30595/pssh.v25i.1759 Yunita, Y., & Mulyadi, M. (2024). Towards Islamic Pedagogy By Exploring The Applications Of Educational Technology. El-Ghiroh, 22(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v22i1.702 Zahiroh, A., & Mukit, A. (2025). Developing female leadership in Islamic education. Journal of Contemporary Education, 14(3). https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=aBvIvlgAAAAJ Zaki, A., & Rosidah, R. (2022). PCK and value internalization among Islamic teachers. EduLine, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.35877/eduline.1291 Zamiri, M., & Esmaeili, A. (2024). Methods and Technologies for Supporting Knowledge Sharing within Learning Communities: A Systematic Literature Review. Administrative Sciences, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14010017 © 2025 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 3 No. 1