Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies AJIS. Vol. 4 No.2 (2025) Page 777-808 e-ISSN: 2988-7399 p-ISSN: 2988-7399 DOI: 10.6160/ajis.v4i2.1216 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Negotiating Multiculturalism in Rural Indonesia: The Structural-Functional Role of Muslim Community Leaders in Social Cohesion Siti Anur Rambe1* , Efi Brata Madya2 1 Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia 2 Correspondence: *siti0103223040@uinsu.ac.id Article History: Received: 12 April 2024 • Revised: 05 Dec 2024 • Accepted: 15 Jan 2025 • Published: 20 Jun 2025 ABSTRACT This study explores the structural-functional role of Muslim community leaders in fostering social cohesion within a multicultural rural context in Tanjung Medan Village, Bilah Barat District, Labuhanbatu Regency. While cultural, linguistic, and ethnic diversity often presents structural friction in rural Indonesian communities, social harmony remains intact through active local leadership. Utilizing a qualitative descriptive approach, data were gathered through observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis involving Muslim community leaders, traditional figures, and village administrators. The findings demonstrate that Muslim community leaders perform essential integrative functions to maintain social equilibrium through proactive strategies, including joint social initiatives, rural infrastructure development, inclusive religious and mutual-aid association (Serikat Tolong Menolong/STM) activities, and deliberative consensus-building (musyawarah). Furthermore, these leaders fulfill structural roles as mediators, advisors, and social catalysts in embedding tolerance and collective solidarity. Despite potential constraints stemming from divergent customs, language, and ethnicity, peaceful coexistence is sustained via effective communication, mutual respect, and cross-group cooperation. In conclusion, Muslim community leaders serve as pivotal structural-functional anchors in negotiating multiculturalism and sustaining a harmoniously integrated, peaceable rural society.Keywords: community leaders; social harmony; Islamic social capital; STM; wirit. 778 ABSTRAK Kohesi sosial masyarakat Muslim pedesaan menghadapi tantangan akibat keberagaman etnis, dinamika politik lokal, persaingan kepentingan, serta interaksi antara aturan formal dan norma sosial-keagamaan. Desa Tanjung Medan, Kecamatan Bilah Barat, Kabupaten Labuhanbatu, merupakan masyarakat multietnis yang terdiri atas kelompok Mandailing, Jawa, Nias, dan kelompok lainnya. Perbedaan budaya, persoalan keamanan, serta perbedaan pilihan politik berpotensi memunculkan ketegangan sosial. Penelitian ini tidak sekadar mengkaji pentingnya tokoh masyarakat, tetapi menganalisis bagaimana agency tokoh masyarakat bekerja melalui institusi lokal dalam membangun kerukunan dan mencegah konflik. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model Miles, Huberman, dan Saldaña melalui pengodean tematik yang dipetakan dengan teori struktural-fungsional Talcott Parsons dan interaksi simbolik George Herbert Mead. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tokoh masyarakat berperan sebagai mediator, fasilitator musyawarah, penggerak kegiatan sosial-keagamaan, dan penghubung masyarakat dengan pemerintah desa. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa Serikat Tolong Menolong (STM) dan wirit berfungsi sebagai modal sosial Islam yang membangun kepercayaan, solidaritas, timbal balik, dan jaringan lintas etnis. STM memperkuat fungsi integration, sedangkan wirit memperkuat latency melalui transmisi nilai moral. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kerukunan merupakan hasil negosiasi berkelanjutan antara perbedaan identitas, kepentingan, norma lokal, dan tata kelola formal. How to Cite: Rambe, S. A., & Madya, E. B. (2026). Negotiating Multiculturalism in Rural Indonesia: The StructuralFunctional Role of Muslim Community Leaders in Social Cohesion. Assyfa Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(2), 777–808. https://doi.org/10.61650/ajis.v4i2.1216 Kata kunci: tokoh masyarakat; kerukunan sosial; modal sosial Islam; STM; wirit. 1. INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION Social cohesion in rural Muslim communities has become an increasingly important issue amid social change, democratization, and decentralization. Rural villages can no longer be understood merely as relatively homogeneous communal spaces; they have increasingly become arenas where diverse ethnic identities, religious affiliations, economic interests, and political orientations intersect. In plural societies, diversity can serve as a source of social strength, but it may also generate tensions when differences are not managed through communication mechanisms and social institutions capable of fostering trust. Hefner (2019) demonstrates that democratic life and pluralism in Indonesia are closely associated with the presence of social institutions and civic ethics that enable diverse groups to coexist. Similarly, Menchik (2016) shows that Indonesia's socio-religious life is shaped by complex relationships among religion, social institutions, and formal rules. Therefore, the study of social harmony in rural communities should examine not only the existence of differences but also how such differences are negotiated through everyday social interactions. Social cohesion becomes more complex when formal village governance interacts with customary norms, religious values, kinship relations, and informal community mechanisms. Formal law plays an important role in regulating village life; however, many social issues are also addressed through © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 779 informal mechanisms, including deliberation (musyawarah), advice from community leaders, religious networks, and systems of social solidarity. This condition demonstrates an ongoing interaction between the formal rule of law and informal customary law. At the same time, local political changes and competition over economic resources may intensify differences in interests. Village head elections, for example, are not merely matters of political preference but may reshape relationships among supporters, social networks, and perceptions of power distribution. Accordingly, social harmony should be understood as an ongoing social process rather than as a fixed or completed condition. This context is particularly evident in Tanjung Medan Village, Bilah Barat District, Labuhanbatu Regency. Based on preliminary findings, the community of Tanjung Medan is ethnically diverse, comprising Mandailing, Javanese, Nias, and other groups. This diversity represents an important social resource but also creates several conditions that may potentially challenge social cohesion. Preliminary observations identified experiences of cultural marginalization among some Javanese residents associated with the stronger influence of the dominant group's customs and cultural practices. In addition, security concerns, including theft and the theft of oil-palm plantation products, have generated anxiety among residents. Differences in political preferences during village head elections and general elections may also contribute to tensions among community members. These conditions indicate that social harmony in Tanjung Medan is not simply a naturally occurring condition but the outcome of social processes involving particular actors, institutions, and mechanisms. Within this context, community leaders occupy a strategic position between formal governmental structures and informal community structures. They do not merely function as respected figures but also serve as intermediaries capable of connecting residents, village government, religious leaders, and customary leaders. Their agency can be observed through the initiation of deliberative forums, mediation, mobilization of mutual assistance, activation of socio-religious activities, and articulation of community aspirations to the village government. Thus, the contribution of community leaders should be understood as a process through which social, symbolic, religious, and relational resources are mobilized to maintain social integration. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of community leaders in rural social life. Hidayat (2019), for example, explains that community leaders can function as mediators through persuasive approaches and communication. However, the study primarily emphasizes the success of mediation without examining in depth the social institutions that sustain such mediation over time. Putri and Sari (2021) demonstrate that community leaders can strengthen solidarity through mutual assistance, deliberation, and religious activities. Nevertheless, their study does not sufficiently explain how such activities develop into networks of trust capable of crossing ethnic boundaries. Kurnia and Muhamad (2023) show that gotong royong strengthens community solidarity, but their analysis does not fully explore the relationship between solidarity, religious institutions, and local governance within a multi-ethnic community. Accordingly, the research gap does not lie in the assumption that studies on community leaders are scarce. Rather, this topic has already received considerable scholarly attention. The more specific gap concerns the limited explanation of how community leaders exercise agency through local institutions, particularly how STM (Serikat Tolong Menolong), wirit, deliberation, and social © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 780 networks are mobilized to develop cross-ethnic social capital while simultaneously bridging formal village governance and informal community norms. Furthermore, previous studies have paid relatively limited attention to power relations within the construction of social harmony, particularly the bargaining position of ethnic minority groups when social decisions are negotiated through community deliberation. This study offers novelty in three main respects. First, it conceptualizes community leaders as agents of local governance rather than merely symbolic or respected figures. Second, it examines STM and wirit as institutions that generate Islamic social capital. STM is not understood merely as a social organization providing assistance during bereavement or other misfortunes, but as a mechanism for generating trust, reciprocal norms, and solidarity networks that can cross ethnic boundaries. Similarly, wirit is examined not merely as a religious activity but as a social space for transmitting moral values, constructing collective identity, and reproducing norms of peaceful coexistence. Third, the study incorporates a power-relations dimension by examining whether deliberative processes provide equitable opportunities for residents from different ethnic backgrounds to express their interests and participate in decision-making. The theoretical framework of this study draws on Talcott Parsons' structural functionalism and George Herbert Mead's symbolic interactionism. Parsons' theory is employed to conceptualize society as a social system that requires the fulfillment of four fundamental functions: Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, and Latency (AGIL). Adaptation is used to analyze the community's capacity to adjust to ethnic diversity and socio-economic needs. Goal Attainment examines how community leaders assist residents in pursuing collective objectives related to security, social order, and village development. Integration is used to analyze deliberation, STM, gotong royong, and interpersonal relationships as mechanisms for maintaining social cohesion. Latency is employed to examine the role of wirit and other religious activities in maintaining and transmitting moral values and social norms. Meanwhile, Mead's symbolic interactionism is used to understand how social meanings are constructed through interaction. The concepts of self, mind, and society help explain how residents understand themselves as members of a broader community, take the perspectives of other social groups, and attach meaning to social symbols such as deliberation, gotong royong, STM, and wirit as expressions of collective solidarity. By integrating these two theoretical perspectives, the study goes beyond identifying what community leaders do and examines how their actions acquire social legitimacy and contribute to the production of social integration. Based on this framework, the study aims to analyze the contribution and agency of community leaders in building social harmony among residents of Tanjung Medan Village, identify the socioreligious mechanisms through which social differences are managed, and examine the roles of STM, wirit, deliberation, and relationships with village government as mechanisms of social integration. The study is expected to contribute to the development of Islamic Community Development scholarship by providing a deeper understanding of the relationship between Islamic social capital, local governance, and social harmony within a multi-ethnic rural community. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 781 The systematic analytical framework of community leaders’ contributions to strengthening social harmony in Tanjung Medan Village is illustrated in Figure 1. Figure 1. Analytical Framework Adaptation: Community adjustment to differences in ethnicity, culture, language, and economic needs. Goal Attainment: Achievement of shared goals related to security, order, development, and village stability. Integration: STM, deliberation, mutual cooperation, and inter-community communication as mechanisms of integration. Latency: Wirit, religious gatherings, religious advice, and exemplary conduct as mechanisms for maintaining social values. 2. RESEARCH METHODS 2.1 Research Design This study employed a qualitative approach with a case-study design. This approach was selected because the research seeks to understand in depth the social processes, meanings of actions, and mechanisms of community leaders' agency in building harmony. The study is not intended to statistically measure relationships among variables but to generate a conceptual understanding of how harmony is constructed within a multi-ethnic community. Tanjung Medan Village was © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 782 selected as the research site based on a unique-case rationale. The site was not selected merely because of its ethnic diversity but because of the combination of Mandailing, Javanese, and Nias populations; potential tensions associated with local politics and security; and the existence of local institutions such as STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, and deliberation that contribute to maintaining social relations. These characteristics make Tanjung Medan a relevant setting for examining how informal community mechanisms interact with formal village governance. See design research in Figure 1. Figure 2. Research Design Informants were selected purposively based on their direct involvement in community social life. The inclusion criteria were: (1) community leaders, customary leaders, religious leaders, or village officials with experience performing social roles in the village; (2) individuals who had participated in deliberations, STM activities, wirit, mutual cooperation, village development, or the resolution of community problems; (3) individuals familiar with inter-community relations across different ethnic groups; and (4) individuals willing to provide information based on their experiences. To strengthen the perspectives represented in the study, informants were not limited to local elites but also included residents from different ethnic backgrounds so that the narratives of community leaders could be compared with residents' experiences. 2.2 Data Collection Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observation, and documentation. In-depth interviews lasted approximately 30–60 minutes per session or were adjusted according to field conditions. The interview guide was developed based on the research focus and Parsons' AGIL framework. Questions concerning Adaptation focused on how residents dealt with cultural differences and economic needs; Goal Attainment addressed security, order, and village © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 783 development; Integration focused on deliberation, STM, mutual cooperation, and conflict resolution; while Latency addressed wirit, religious gatherings, religious values, and the transmission of social norms. Observation was conducted during activities directly related to the research focus, particularly STM, wirit/religious gatherings, mutual cooperation, deliberation, development activities, and community interactions. Observation focused on who participated, how communication occurred, who had opportunities to speak, how decisions were made, and how different ethnic groups were positioned during interactions. Documentation complemented the data through village archives, activity records, STM documentation, religious activities, deliberation records, development activities, and other relevant documents. 2.3 Data Analysis Data analysis in this study employed the qualitative data analysis model proposed by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014), consisting of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The analysis was conducted systematically to identify patterns related to the contribution and agency of community leaders in building social harmony among residents of Tanjung Medan Village. The data analysis began with data condensation by selecting, organizing, and coding relevant information obtained from in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation. The initial coding focused on empirical phenomena such as community leaders' mediation, deliberation, communication, mutual cooperation, Serikat Tolong Menolong (STM), wirit, social solidarity, ethnic differences, political differences, security issues, and relations between community leaders and village government. The second stage involved axial coding, in which related codes were grouped into broader analytical categories, including social interaction, Islamic social capital, social integration, religious values, local governance, conflict management, and power relations. The third stage was selective coding, which was used to identify the central theme of the study, namely community leaders' agency and Islamic social capital as mechanisms for strengthening social integration and mitigating potential social conflict. The findings were subsequently interpreted using Talcott Parsons' AGIL framework and George Herbert Mead's symbolic interactionism. The AGIL framework was used to classify findings into Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, and Latency. Adaptation refers to the community's ability to adjust to ethnic, cultural, and socioeconomic differences; Goal Attainment concerns efforts to achieve security, order, and common village objectives; Integration refers to the role of STM, deliberation, mutual cooperation, and communication in maintaining social cohesion; and Latency refers to the role of wirit and religious activities in maintaining and transmitting social and moral values. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 784 Figure 3. Coding Process of the Research Data The final conclusions were verified through comparison across data sources and data collection techniques. This analytical procedure enabled the study to move beyond descriptive accounts of community activities toward an explanation of the mechanisms through which community leaders, STM, wirit, deliberation, and other local institutions contribute to social harmony. 2.4 Research Instruments As a qualitative case study, this research did not use standardized quantitative instruments to measure variables. The primary research instrument was the researcher, supported by semistructured interview guidelines, observation guidelines, and documentation guidelines. These instruments were developed based on the research objectives, the empirical context of Tanjung Medan Village, and the theoretical framework of Talcott Parsons and George Herbert Mead. The interview guidelines were designed to explore the experiences and perspectives of community leaders, religious leaders, traditional leaders, village officials, and residents from different ethnic backgrounds. The questions focused on community leaders' roles in mediation, deliberation, communication, social mobilization, conflict prevention, and relationships with the village government. Questions also addressed the role of STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, and religious activities in strengthening trust and solidarity among residents. The observation guidelines were used to examine social interactions and participation in activities such as STM, wirit, religious gatherings, mutual cooperation, village meetings, and deliberation forums. Observation focused on patterns of communication, participation, decision-making processes, relationships among ethnic groups, and the role of community leaders in facilitating interaction. Documentation guidelines were used to collect relevant village documents and records, © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 785 including village meeting records, documentation of STM activities, religious activities, community activities, development activities, and other documents relevant to social harmony and local governance. The research instruments were also mapped to the AGIL framework to ensure that the theoretical perspective was directly connected to data collection. No. 1 Informant/Source Community leaders Table 1. Research Instrument Matrix Data Collection Technique Main Focus In-depth interview Leadership role and agency 2 Religious leaders In-depth interview 3 Traditional leaders In-depth interview 4 Village officials In-depth interview Formal village governance 5 Residents from different ethnic groups Community activities Village/community documents In-depth interview Community perceptions Observation Social interaction Documentation Supporting evidence 6 7 Religious and social values Customary norms and local relations Analytical Indicators Mediation, communication, deliberation, mobilization, conflict management Wirit, religious advice, moral values, tolerance, solidarity Customary values, social norms, conflict resolution, cultural interaction Village regulations, public services, development, cooperation with community leaders Harmony, participation, trust, marginalization, social interaction, power relations STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, deliberation, participation Meeting records, activity records, village documents, social and religious activities The interview process was conducted semi-structurally, with an approximate duration of 30–60 minutes per session, depending on the availability and circumstances of each informant. The interview questions were flexible so that the researcher could explore emerging information while maintaining consistency with the research focus. 2.5 Validity and Reliability Because this research employed a qualitative approach, data quality was not assessed through statistical validity and reliability tests such as Product Moment correlation or Cronbach's Alpha. Instead, the trustworthiness of the data was established through triangulation, member checking, and continuous comparison between empirical data and theoretical interpretation. Source triangulation was conducted by comparing information obtained from community leaders with the perspectives of village officials, religious and traditional leaders, and residents from different ethnic backgrounds, particularly Mandailing, Javanese, and Nias communities. This procedure was important to avoid relying exclusively on the narratives of local elites. Technique triangulation was conducted by comparing interview findings with observations and documentation. For example, statements concerning the role of STM were compared with observations of STM activities and available records of community assistance. Similarly, information regarding wirit and religious activities was compared with field observations and documentation. Member checking was conducted by clarifying important information with selected informants to ensure that the researcher's interpretation was consistent with the meaning intended by the informants. The researcher also maintained field notes throughout the research © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 786 process to record observations, contextual information, and reflections that could support the interpretation of interview data. The analytical interpretation was further strengthened through theoretical triangulation by examining the findings through both Parsons' AGIL framework and Mead's symbolic interactionism. The use of these two perspectives allowed the researcher to examine both the structural functions of social institutions and the meanings produced through everyday interaction.. 2.6 Research Subject and Location The research was conducted in Tanjung Medan Village, Bilah Barat District, Labuhanbatu Regency. The research subjects consisted of community leaders, religious leaders, traditional leaders, village officials, and residents who were directly involved in or had knowledge of social interaction and harmony in the village. Tanjung Medan Village was selected through purposive case selection. The selection was not based solely on ethnic heterogeneity but on the combination of several characteristics that make the village analytically relevant. The community consists of residents from different ethnic backgrounds, including Mandailing, Javanese, Nias, and other groups. At the same time, the village has experienced social dynamics associated with cultural differences, security concerns, local political competition, and differences in community interests. These conditions coexist with local institutions such as STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, and deliberation that function as mechanisms for maintaining social relationships. Therefore, Tanjung Medan Village represents a relevant case for examining how informal social institutions and community leaders interact with formal village governance in managing diversity and maintaining social harmony. Informants were selected purposively according to specific inclusion criteria. The criteria included: (1) having a recognized role as a community, religious, traditional, or village leader, or being a resident with direct experience of the social dynamics under study; (2) having lived or served in Tanjung Medan Village for a sufficient period to understand local social relations; (3) having participated in deliberation, STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, village development, or conflict management activities; (4) being familiar with relationships among residents from different ethnic backgrounds; and (5) being willing to participate voluntarily in the research. To prevent the study from being dominated by elite perspectives, residents from different ethnic backgrounds were also included as informants. Their perspectives were used to compare and verify the narratives presented by community leaders. Code I1 Age 35 I2 I3 I4 I5 I6 40 55 45 45 30 Table 2. Informant Matrix Position/Role Ethnicity Community Mandailing Leader Religious Leader Mandailing Traditional Leader Melayu Village Official Javanse Resident Javanese Resident Nias © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia Religion Islam Islam [insert] [insert] [insert] [insert] AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 787 The relationship between the research questions, data sources, and analytical procedures is presented in Table 3. No. 1 2 3 4 5 Table 3. Research Questions and Analytical Procedures Research Question Data Source Analytical Procedure How do community leaders contribute to Interviews, observations, Thematic coding and building social harmony in Tanjung Medan documentation descriptive interpretation Village? What mechanisms are used by community Interviews and Open coding, axial leaders to manage social, cultural, and political observations coding, and thematic differences? analysis How do STM and wirit function as Interviews, observations, Thematic analysis and mechanisms of Islamic social capital? documentation interpretation using AGIL How are social interactions and meanings of Interviews and Symbolic interactionism harmony constructed among residents? observations analysis How do formal village governance and Interviews, observations, AGIL analysis and informal social institutions interact in documentation power-relations analysis maintaining harmony? The analytical framework ensured that each research question was connected to a specific data source and analytical procedure. This approach enabled the study to move from empirical descriptions of community activities toward a theoretically informed explanation of community leaders' agency and the role of Islamic social capital in maintaining harmony. Overall, the methodological design was intended to capture the dynamic relationship between community leaders, local social institutions, formal village governance, and residents from different ethnic backgrounds. The study therefore treats social harmony not as a static condition but as an ongoing social process produced through mediation, interaction, negotiation, solidarity, and the reproduction of shared values. 3. RESULTS AND FINDINGS The findings presented in this section are derived from the empirical material reported in the research manuscript, namely semi-structured interviews, field observations, and documentation collected in Tanjung Medan Village. The presentation is intentionally separated from theoretical interpretation so that the results describe what was encountered in the field before those findings are discussed through Parsons’ structural-functional framework and Mead’s symbolic interactionism. Data condensation and coding identified recurring empirical phenomena concerning ethnic diversity, cultural difference, security concerns, political tension, mediation by community leaders, deliberation, mutual cooperation, Serikat Tolong Menolong (STM), wirit or religious gatherings, village development, and relations between community leaders and the village government. Cross-source comparison was used to avoid treating the account of a single local actor as the complete representation of village life. The findings indicate that harmony in Tanjung Medan was not characterized by the absence of differences. Instead, the field material showed the coexistence of potential friction and recurring community mechanisms used to manage everyday relations. The following subsections therefore present the demographic-social setting, concrete contributions of community leaders, and the operation of local social institutions as empirically observed mechanisms of social cohesion. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 788 3.1 Demographic Profile and Socio-Ethnic Fragmentation of the Research Setting Field data portray Tanjung Medan Village as a multi-ethnic rural community in which Mandailing, Javanese, Nias, and other residents interact within the same village social space. The significance of this diversity was visible not only in the presence of different ethnic identities but also in differences in language, customary practices, social habits, political preferences, and ways of participating in community life. The empirical material identifies several situations in which these differences could become socially sensitive. Some Javanese residents were reported to experience cultural marginalization when the customs and cultural practices of a more dominant group had stronger influence in everyday community life. Security also appeared as a shared concern, particularly in relation to theft and the loss of oil-palm plantation products. In addition, differences in political preference during village-head elections and general elections were identified as moments that could intensify tension among residents. These findings do not demonstrate permanent ethnic conflict. Rather, they show the specific social conditions within which community leaders, village institutions, and residents were required to negotiate difference and maintain workable relationships across ethnic and political boundaries. The composition of the research participants was designed to capture this social complexity. Informants were selected purposively from community leaders, religious leaders, traditional leaders, village officials, and residents with direct knowledge of inter-community relations and participation in deliberation, STM, wirit, mutual cooperation, village development, or conflictmanagement activities. Residents from different ethnic backgrounds were included so that narratives provided by local leaders could be compared with experiences at the community level. This is methodologically important because the study concerns not only the formal or symbolic role of respected figures but also how their actions are experienced by people situated differently within the village social structure. The available manuscript, however, does not provide a complete individual-level list containing each participant’s initials, ethnicity, religion, social role, and length of leadership. Accordingly, Table 1 reports only participant characteristics explicitly supported by the research record and does not invent missing biographical information. Before publication, the authors should replace the “not individually reported” entries with verified field-record data where available, while retaining anonymized participant codes to protect confidentiality. Table 4. Empirically Reported Informant Profile and Data Coverage Informant group Leadership duration Ethnic coverage Religion Social role / experience Not individually reported Mediation, communication, deliberation, mobilization, conflict management Wirit, religious advice, moral values, tolerance, solidarity Not individually reported Religious leaders Cross-ethnic relations considered Not individually reported Traditional leaders Not individually reported Not individually reported Not individually reported Village officials Not individually reported Not individually reported Customary values, social norms, cultural interaction, conflict resolution Formal governance, development, public services, cooperation with community leaders Community leaders Muslim socioreligious context © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia Not individually reported Not individually reported AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 789 Residents Mandailing, Javanese, Nias and other groups represented in the research setting Not individually reported Community perceptions of harmony, participation, trust, marginalization and social interaction Not applicable / not individually reported 3.2 Concrete Contributions of Community Leaders in Residents’ Social Dynamics The empirical data identify community leaders as active actors in the handling of everyday community problems rather than merely ceremonial figures. Their contribution appeared most clearly in mediation, communication, deliberation, social mobilization, village development, and coordination with formal village authorities. When disagreements or social problems emerged, community leaders were reported to approach the parties concerned, facilitate communication, and direct unresolved issues toward deliberation. This pattern placed community leaders between household- or group-level interaction and the formal structure of village government. Their role was also visible outside situations of dispute. Leaders participated in or encouraged mutual cooperation, environmental cleaning, construction and improvement of public facilities, mosquerelated activities, and other collective village work. These activities created repeated occasions for residents from different backgrounds to work in the same social setting. The data therefore show two interconnected forms of contribution: a responsive function, in which leaders intervened when problems or tensions appeared, and a mobilizing function, in which they organized or supported routine collective activities before tension developed into open conflict. Both forms were repeatedly associated with maintaining communication among residents. Figure 4. Field Interview with a Community Informant in Tanjung Medan Village Source: Research documentation, 2026 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 790 A second empirical pattern concerned the position of community leaders as intermediaries between residents and the village government. Interview and observational material reported that community concerns could be conveyed through respected local figures, while information and collective decisions from village structures could also be communicated back to residents. This bridging role was particularly relevant when issues involved security, village development, competing interests, or matters requiring broader agreement. Community leaders also participated in religious and deliberative forums, where advice about mutual respect, togetherness, peaceful coexistence, and the avoidance of conflict was communicated to residents. Importantly, the research material does not support reducing this contribution to a single type of leader or a single ethnic group. The study design deliberately incorporated community, religious, traditional, governmental, and resident perspectives because leadership operated through overlapping social roles. What emerged from the field was therefore a networked pattern of local leadership: mediation was connected to deliberation, deliberation to village coordination, and social mobilization to recurring community encounters. This network of actions constitutes the principal empirical finding concerning the agency of community leaders in Tanjung Medan. Table 2. Empirical Forms of Community-Leader Contribution Observed/reported Immediate empirical Empirical domain Community arena action function Mediation Approaching parties, Interpersonal/group Opening communication facilitating disputes and preventing escalation communication, directing unresolved matters to deliberation Social mobilization Encouraging gotong Community activities Bringing residents into royong, environmental repeated cooperative cleaning and collective interaction work Village development Participation in Village development Coordinating collective construction/improvement interests and participation of public facilities and related activities Religious leadership Supporting Religious gatherings Maintaining recurring wirit/pengajian and interaction and shared communicating moralsocial messages social advice Government liaison Conveying community Formal-informal Connecting resident concerns and coordinating governance interface concerns with village with village authorities decision processes 3.3 Local Social Institutions as Instruments of Harmony: STM, Wirit, and Deliberation Serikat Tolong Menolong (STM) emerged from the field material as one of the most visible local mechanisms of mutual assistance. Its activities were associated with situations in which residents experienced bereavement, illness, accidents, or other forms of difficulty requiring collective support. The research record describes STM as a setting in which assistance could take material, practical, and participatory forms and in which residents were encouraged to help beyond immediate family boundaries. Of particular relevance to the multi-ethnic setting, STM activities provided opportunities for residents from different backgrounds to encounter one another through © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 791 concrete acts of assistance rather than through abstract declarations of tolerance. Observation and documentation were used to compare interview claims concerning STM with actual community activities and available records. The empirical importance of STM in this study therefore lies in its repeated pattern of action: a resident or family experiences difficulty, information circulates through community networks, assistance is mobilized, and community members participate in support. These recurring encounters produced observable practices of helping, reciprocity, and social contact across everyday community relationships, which were subsequently interpreted theoretically in the Discussion section rather than assumed in advance. Wirit and other religious gatherings formed a second recurring arena identified in interviews, observations, and documentation. These activities were not recorded solely as ritual events; they also brought residents together at regular intervals and created opportunities for communication before, during, and after religious activities. Religious and community leaders used these gatherings to communicate advice concerning brotherhood, mutual assistance, respect for differences, social responsibility, and avoidance of conflict. The empirical result is therefore not simply that religious gatherings existed, but that they functioned as repeated social encounters in which moral messages and interpersonal contact occurred together. The study’s observation guidelines specifically examined patterns of participation, communication, and interaction during wirit and related gatherings, while documentation was used to support the existence of these activities. The manuscript does not provide a verified numerical attendance series or exact frequency for every gathering; consequently, no unsupported figures are introduced in this revision. What can be established from the available research record is that wirit/religious gatherings were recurring activities recognized by informants and observed as part of the village’s social-religious life, making them an important empirical component of the local mechanisms through which residents maintained continuing contact. Deliberation (musyawarah) constituted the third major mechanism found in the data and was particularly relevant when a problem could not be resolved through direct interpersonal communication. The field material describes a recurring process in which a social problem or sign of tension was first recognized, followed by communication with the parties involved and the involvement of community leaders. Where broader consideration was required, the issue was brought into a deliberative setting involving relevant residents, community or religious figures, and, when necessary, village officials. The purpose of this process was to allow positions to be expressed, negotiate differences, and arrive at an agreement or practical follow-up. Political differences surrounding village-head elections and general elections were identified as situations with potential to intensify tension, making the availability of informal communication and deliberative channels especially relevant. Observation focused not only on whether a meeting occurred but also on who participated, who had opportunities to speak, and how decisions were made. This is significant because the empirical assessment of harmony must include participation and bargaining processes, not merely the final appearance of consensus. Figure 3 summarizes the conflict-resolution sequence consistently reflected in the research design and reported field mechanisms. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 792 Figure 5. Empirical Flow of Community-Based Conflict Resolution Taken together, STM, wirit, and musyawarah show that the maintenance of social relations in Tanjung Medan was embedded in recurring local practices rather than dependent on a single formal intervention. Each institution operated in a different empirical arena. STM organized assistance when residents faced misfortune or practical need; wirit and religious gatherings created repeated socio-religious encounters and channels for moral advice; and musyawarah provided a procedure for communicating, negotiating, and following up issues that involved competing interests or potential conflict. Mutual cooperation and village-development activities complemented these three mechanisms by placing residents in situations requiring shared work. The data also show that community leaders were involved across these arenas, which explains why their contribution appeared simultaneously interpersonal, institutional, religious, and governmental. At the level of results, the important finding is the recurrence and interconnection of these practices. 4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The significance of community leadership in Tanjung Medan is best understood not as the personal capacity of respected individuals to “keep the peace,” but as a form of relational agency situated between heterogeneous social groups, informal institutions, religious authority, and formal village governance. This distinction is theoretically consequential. Parsons’ structural functionalism would predict that a differentiated social system requires mechanisms capable of coordinating its constituent parts, yet the Tanjung Medan case suggests that such coordination cannot be attributed to institutional functions in the abstract. Adaptation occurs because social actors repeatedly negotiate cultural and linguistic differences; Goal Attainment becomes possible when dispersed interests are translated into collectively recognizable concerns; Integration depends on actors capable of moving between social networks; and Latency requires spaces through which normative expectations can be reproduced. Community leaders occupy these intersections, but their authority appears to derive less from a fixed formal position than from their ability to mobilize relationships © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 793 across them. This interpretation extends Sumarmi, Untari, and Meiji’s (2022) analysis of Desa Pancasila, which identifies local government, community leaders, and youth as significant actors in translating national values into village practice, because the present study specifies the institutional channels through which such local agency becomes socially effective. It also develops Humaedi et al.’s (2021) argument that local leadership and gotong royong constitute important resources for collective resilience: Tanjung Medan indicates that leadership becomes effective when it is embedded in repeated social practices rather than activated only during exceptional disruption. Najma and Bakri’s (2022) study of Kalimanggis similarly positions Islamic leaders and adaptive religious practice as social glue in a multicultural village, but their emphasis on tolerance through multicultural Islamic education leaves relatively unexplored how religious leadership intersects with informal welfare institutions, conflict mediation, and formal governance. More recent evidence from Yoga and Sutama’s study of Kampung Saren Jawa likewise foregrounds communication, mutual respect, local traditions, and religious and customary leaders in sustaining multicultural harmony. The Tanjung Medan case pushes this literature further by treating leadership as an institutional brokerage process. This reframing matters for Islamic Community Development because it shifts analytical attention away from the charismatic or moral qualities of the leader toward the social architecture that allows leadership to function. It also cautions against policy interventions that merely appoint, train, or formally recognize community leaders without sustaining the local networks through which their legitimacy is continuously produced. The multi-ethnic character of Tanjung Medan also complicates any functionalist assumption that social equilibrium signifies successful integration. Cultural difference, political competition, security concerns, and unequal symbolic positions do not disappear simply because open conflict remains limited; they are continually processed through everyday relationships. In Parsons’ terms, Adaptation should therefore not be reduced to minorities adjusting themselves to a culturally dominant environment. Such an interpretation would mistake accommodation for integration and could obscure asymmetrical costs borne by different groups. The reported experience of cultural distance among some Javanese residents is analytically important precisely because it exposes this limitation: a village can remain outwardly cohesive while particular identities experience pressure to conform. The finding invites a more critical reading of structural functionalism in which equilibrium is treated as an empirical question rather than an automatically desirable endpoint. Mahmudin et al. (2021), studying social capital among Sunda Wiwitan minority communities, demonstrate the importance of distinguishing bonding, bridging, and linking forms of social capital when assessing cohesion under conditions of minority status. Wiasti, Yadnya, and Dhanawaty’s (2022) analysis of language convergence in a Muslim diaspora community in Bali similarly indicates that communicative adjustment within a dominant linguistic environment is intertwined with social identity, making adaptation socially consequential rather than culturally neutral. Supriatna et al. (2023) likewise associate cultural diversity, social networks, and social capital with community resilience, although their quantitative urban setting does not illuminate the microprocesses through which unequal cultural positions are negotiated. The Tanjung Medan evidence thus extends the resilience literature by demonstrating why social cohesion should be conceptualized as negotiated rather than merely possessed: the capacity to remain connected despite difference depends on recurrent opportunities to communicate, cooperate, contest, and © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 794 renegotiate relationships. This interpretation also resonates with Demartoto and Ramdhon’s (2023) account of Chinese–Javanese relations in Surakarta, where pluralism was socially constructed through collective meanings, cultural symbols, and inter-ethnic collaboration rather than simply guaranteed by demographic coexistence. The theoretical consequence is substantial. Adaptation and Integration should be read dynamically: adaptation concerns reciprocal adjustment rather than minority assimilation, while integration concerns maintaining channels through which difference can remain socially expressible. For village governance, this means that the absence of visible conflict is an insufficient indicator of successful multicultural governance. Policy evaluation must also examine whose cultural practices remain visible, whose language and preferences shape deliberation, and whether minority residents can participate without relinquishing meaningful dimensions of identity. STM provides the clearest basis for moving from a generic vocabulary of “solidarity” toward a mechanism-based conception of Islamic social capital. Its analytical importance does not arise simply because residents assist one another; mutual aid is widespread across Indonesian communities and has already been extensively associated with gotong royong. What is theoretically distinctive is the conversion of a religiously meaningful obligation to assist others into a recurring institutional arrangement through which expectations of reciprocity, trust, social obligation, and network membership can be reproduced. In Parsons’ framework, this makes STM an Integration mechanism because it connects differentiated actors through patterned expectations. Yet social-capital theory reveals a process that functionalism alone leaves underdeveloped: assistance becomes socially consequential because repeated exchanges create expectations concerning what members may reasonably expect from one another. Sumarmi et al. (2022) identify gotong royong as an important form of social capital for implementing shared national values, while Humaedi et al. (2021) show how mutual cooperation and local leadership contribute to community resilience under crisis. Studies of community resilience provide a comparable mechanism. The research on Surabaya’s urban kampungs emphasizes community networks and self-organization as resources for managing both major and everyday shocks, while Qadriina, Herdiansyah, and Aryo (2024) conceptualize social capital as a community asset that mobilizes collective action and support during post-earthquake recovery. Nurdin’s (2024) investigation of Islamic faith-based organizations goes closer to the religious dimension, demonstrating that Islamic organizations can build or strengthen social capital during disaster recovery. Tanjung Medan nevertheless differs from these crisis-centered settings: STM embeds reciprocal assistance within ordinary social life before an extraordinary disaster occurs. This temporal difference is theoretically important because it suggests that Islamic social capital is not merely a reserve activated during crisis; it may be continuously produced through mundane practices of giving, receiving, remembering obligations, and recognizing others as members of a morally connected community. The interpretation also advances beyond the manuscript’s earlier literature, which largely characterized mutual assistance and community activity as routes to solidarity without sufficiently explaining how solidarity becomes institutionally reproducible. The critical qualification is that social capital is not inherently bridging. Dense reciprocity can reinforce bonding within an already cohesive group while excluding outsiders. STM can be claimed as crossethnic Islamic social capital only insofar as participation and assistance actually traverse ethnic © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 795 and status boundaries. This distinction gives the finding both theoretical precision and practical relevance: strengthening STM should mean widening the social radius of reciprocity, not simply increasing the intensity of assistance among already well-connected members. Wirit requires a similarly differentiated interpretation. Treating religious gatherings as automatically harmony-producing would reproduce a normative assumption rather than explain a social mechanism. Their relevance in Tanjung Medan lies in the combination of temporal repetition, moral communication, face-to-face encounter, and the symbolic interpretation of participation. Parsons’ Latency function helps explain why recurrent religious settings matter: a social system cannot depend exclusively on episodic conflict resolution because norms concerning brotherhood, assistance, restraint, and peaceful coexistence must be maintained between moments of tension. Mead provides the missing micro-foundation. Norms do not become socially effective merely because leaders pronounce them; actors interpret symbols, observe others’ responses, take the perspectives of relevant social groups, and revise expectations through interaction. Wirit can consequently be understood as a site in which religious discourse and everyday recognition operate simultaneously. Najma and Bakri (2022) found that multicultural Islamic education in Kalimanggis adapts to local culture and that Islamic leadership can operate as a social adhesive within diversity. Saputra, Yunanda, and Kiram’s (2022) phenomenological work on Majelis Taklim Fardhu Ain in North Sumatra similarly associates religious understanding and practice with patterns of social integration. Recent research on routine religious activities in Jodipan further argues that Burdah, Maulid Diba’, and public religious studies function not only spiritually but also as spaces of interaction, togetherness, and solidarity. These studies help establish that religious gatherings can generate social effects, but the present analysis adds a symbolic-interactionist explanation for how those effects may become durable. Repetition matters because meanings are stabilized through recurrent interaction: helping ceases to be only an abstract religious injunction when participants encounter one another within a social environment where mutual responsibility is repeatedly articulated and enacted. Yet this mechanism has limits. A religious gathering may strengthen bonding capital while leaving ethnic, generational, gender, or status inequalities intact; participation itself cannot be assumed to be equally accessible. Recent research on majelis taklim participation, for example, identifies demographic imbalance as a substantive problem rather than assuming that the existence of a religious forum guarantees broad inclusion. The theoretical contribution of the Tanjung Medan case should therefore be formulated carefully: wirit can function as a Latency mechanism and a site of meaning-making when repeated religious interaction reproduces norms that are socially transferable beyond the ritual group. For practice, the implication is not to instrumentalize worship as a government conflict-management program, but to recognize the existing social infrastructure of religious gatherings while safeguarding their voluntary, community-based character and widening opportunities for the values articulated within them to inform cross-group relations. Musyawarah reveals the strongest tension between social integration and power, and this tension prevents the analysis from becoming an uncritical celebration of local wisdom. Parsons can explain deliberation as an integrative institution that coordinates competing interests, while Mead clarifies how communicative interaction allows participants to interpret one another’s positions and construct a shared definition of a problem. Neither framework, however, is sufficient if consensus © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 796 is treated as evidence that every participant possessed comparable influence. The crucial analytical question is not whether agreement was reached but how the conditions of agreement were produced. Indonesian village-governance scholarship provides strong reasons for this caution. Research on rural planning published in 2022 argues that village deliberation can contain substantial power contestation, with informal power relations influencing formal planning meetings and potentially obscuring public preferences. Briansyah and Riyadh’s (2024) work similarly identifies continuing challenges surrounding meaningful community participation in village-governance planning. Turmudi and Iksan (2024), from a legal-governance perspective, position village deliberation as a strategic pillar of village democracy and development, demonstrating the normative importance of musyawarah within Indonesian governance. Yet Ramda’s more recent analysis warns of “pseudo-participation”: legal guarantees of participation do not necessarily ensure substantive influence within policy formation. These perspectives illuminate why the Tanjung Medan finding concerning ethnic position, social status, and access to community authority is not peripheral but central to the interpretation of harmony. The experience of cultural marginalization reported in the research setting creates a plausible possibility that actors may enter deliberation with unequal symbolic resources. A respected leader may successfully prevent escalation while simultaneously reproducing a hierarchy if some voices are regarded as more legitimate than others. This does not invalidate musyawarah; it distinguishes procedural presence from substantive inclusion. The study therefore extends conventional functionalist reasoning by introducing a power-sensitive criterion for Integration: a mechanism cannot be evaluated solely by whether it produces stability, because stability achieved through silence, deference, or cultural assimilation differs sociologically from stability achieved through meaningful negotiation. This distinction also sharpens the interpretation of the newly developed empirical conflict-resolution flow. Communication, mediation, deliberation, negotiation, and agreement should not be treated as a mechanically linear technology of peace. Each transition contains decisions about who defines the problem, who is recognized as a legitimate mediator, whose account enters the deliberative arena, and whose concessions become embedded in the final agreement. Sustainable village harmony thus depends not only on consensus but on the social conditions under which consensus becomes legitimate. The interaction between informal community institutions and formal village government further differentiates the Tanjung Medan case from accounts that locate cohesion either in state intervention or in autonomous community solidarity. Community leaders appear analytically significant precisely because they operate at the boundary between these domains. This boundary position can be understood as a form of linking social capital: actors connect horizontal networks of residents with vertically differentiated structures of authority and resources. The manuscript’s original framing already recognizes that leaders communicate community aspirations to village government while simultaneously helping residents interpret formal decisions; the deeper implication is that local governance is partially produced outside government offices. This interpretation complements Sumarmi et al. (2022), who show that village-level implementation of collective values depends on multiple local actors rather than government alone. It also resonates with the Surabaya research showing that community networks strengthen capacities for selforganization and everyday resilience. Nurdin’s (2024) work on Islamic faith-based organizations © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 797 further demonstrates that religious organizations can mobilize social capital in ways that matter for collective recovery, indicating that governance capacity can be distributed across formal and non-formal institutions. Susanto’s (2022) study of the Peaceful Village of Gemblegan likewise emphasizes social capital in the development of tolerance across religious communities. The distinction in Tanjung Medan is the institutional combination: STM, wirit, musyawarah, community leadership, and village governance do not operate as isolated variables but as an interconnected local governance ecology. This helps explain why the agency of leaders cannot be reduced to personal charisma. A leader without access to functioning social networks may possess symbolic status but little capacity to coordinate action; conversely, institutions without actors capable of connecting them may remain socially fragmented. The implication for Islamic Community Development is a shift from leader-centered intervention toward relational capacitybuilding. Programs intended to strengthen cohesion should map the actual routes through which information, assistance, religious norms, grievances, and public decisions circulate. Yet institutional brokerage also creates risk: actors who control connections between residents and formal authorities may become gatekeepers. Strengthening community leadership must consequently be accompanied by transparent access, multiple channels of representation, and opportunities for minority residents to approach village governance without dependence on a single intermediary. The same mechanism that produces coordination can otherwise consolidate unequal control over information and representation. Taken together, the dialogue between Parsons and Mead produces a more defensible explanation of social cohesion than either framework can offer independently, but the Tanjung Medan case also exposes the limitations of both. Parsons provides a macro-level grammar for distinguishing Adaptation, Goal Attainment, Integration, and Latency, thereby showing why security, collective objectives, mutual assistance, deliberation, and religious value maintenance perform different yet interconnected systemic tasks. Mead explains why these functions cannot operate mechanically: institutions become socially consequential only when actors assign meaning to them through interaction. STM acquires integrative force when giving and receiving assistance becomes interpreted as mutual responsibility; wirit acquires normative force when recurrent participation gives religious messages recognizable social meaning; musyawarah acquires legitimacy when residents learn to interpret dialogue as an acceptable means of handling disagreement. Demartoto and Ramdhon’s (2023) finding that pluralism in Surakarta is constructed as a collective social reality through symbols and inter-ethnic cooperation reinforces the importance of this meaningmaking dimension. Yoga and Sutama similarly demonstrate the importance of social communication, openness, tolerance, and local traditions in multicultural harmony. Mahmudin et al. (2021), however, remind us that social capital has differentiated bonding, bridging, and linking dimensions, while the village-deliberation literature demonstrates that interaction always occurs within structures of unequal influence. The present study therefore does more than place two classical theories side by side. Its more useful theoretical proposition is that social cohesion emerges from an iterative relationship between institutional functionality, socially constructed meaning, and unequal relational positioning. Function without meaning would reduce actors to passive components of a system; meaning without institutional structure would inadequately explain why some interpretations become durable; both without power analysis could mistake © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 798 conformity for cohesion. This three-level interpretation is especially important for the reported position of Javanese and Nias residents. Their inclusion cannot be inferred merely from participation in shared institutions. Meaningful integration requires that cross-ethnic interaction generate both belonging and capacity to influence collective decisions. In this sense, the study modifies rather than simply confirms structural functionalism: equilibrium is treated as provisional, negotiated, and potentially unequal. It simultaneously extends symbolic interactionism by showing that locally constructed meanings are stabilized through institutional infrastructures that repeatedly organize encounters among actors. The broader contribution to Islamic Community Development lies in conceptualizing Islamic social capital as an infrastructure of negotiated coexistence rather than as a normative synonym for Muslim solidarity. Contemporary Indonesian evidence increasingly shows that cohesion depends on combinations of social networks, local leadership, cultural resources, religious organizations, and collective action. Nurdin (2024) demonstrates how Islamic faith-based organizations create or strengthen social capital; Qadriina et al. (2024) show that social capital can mobilize collective action in community recovery; research on Surabaya emphasizes the resilience-producing capacity of community networks; Sumarmi et al. (2022) demonstrate how local actors and gotong royong translate collective values into village practice; Najma and Bakri (2022) reveal the adaptive relationship between Islamic leadership and multicultural culture; Mahmudin et al. (2021) expose the importance of bonding, bridging, and linking capital for minority cohesion; and recent work on youth peacebuilding in Central Java explicitly combines intergroup contact and social capital to understand preventive conflict strategies. Against this literature, the distinctive contribution of Tanjung Medan is not another claim that religion, local wisdom, or community leaders are “important.” Its analytical contribution is to specify how several mechanisms intersect: religiously inflected reciprocity is institutionalized through STM; normative continuity and meaning-making are reproduced through wirit; difference is processed through musyawarah; community leaders broker horizontal and vertical relationships; and formal village governance provides an institutional endpoint for concerns that cannot be managed solely through informal networks. The long-term practical implication is consequently more demanding than recommending that village governments “strengthen harmony.” Effective policy would need to preserve the autonomy of organic community institutions while making their bridging and linking capacities more inclusive, monitor whether deliberative access is substantively distributed across ethnic groups, develop multiple communication channels so that community leaders do not become exclusive gatekeepers, and treat early social signals—cultural marginalization, security anxiety, or electoral polarization—as governance information rather than waiting for open conflict. Such an approach transforms conflict prevention from episodic intervention into socialinfrastructure maintenance. Theoretically, it also reframes harmony as an achievement that must continually be reproduced, contested, and renegotiated. That proposition is more consistent with the empirical complexity of Tanjung Medan than a static image of a harmonious village and provides a transferable analytical model for studying other multi-ethnic Muslim rural communities without assuming that the particular institutional forms identified here will operate identically elsewhere. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 799 The study’s critical implication is therefore that the sustainability of harmony should be judged by the quality of relationships that reproduce it, not merely by the absence of confrontation. This distinction becomes especially important in rural political contexts where village-head elections, resource interests, cultural hierarchy, and interpersonal networks may overlap. Recent research on post-election reconciliation in Jatilengger Village examines precisely how political polarization after a village-head election affects social cohesion and how local values and community actors contribute to reconciliation. Research on deliberative rural planning likewise demonstrates that informal power relations may penetrate formal decision-making, while recent governance scholarship identifies the possibility of pseudo-participation even where legal structures formally guarantee public involvement. These comparisons make it difficult to interpret Tanjung Medan’s negotiated harmony as evidence of a completed equilibrium. A more defensible interpretation is that community cohesion is continuously produced through a combination of preventive communication, reciprocal assistance, moral socialization, mediation, and negotiated access to authority. The empirical conflict-resolution flow developed from this research should consequently be read as a recursive rather than terminal model: agreement does not end the social process because implementation changes relationships, creates memories of fairness or unfairness, and shapes how actors approach the next disagreement. This insight links Mead’s emphasis on the social production of meaning with a critical revision of Parsons. Successful Integration feeds back into future Adaptation and Goal Attainment only when participants interpret previous processes as sufficiently legitimate to warrant continued participation. An agreement perceived as imposed may generate surface stability while weakening future trust. Conversely, a process in which minority voices are substantively recognized can expand bridging capital and reduce the social distance that makes later tensions harder to manage. The policy consequence is concrete: village governments and community institutions should evaluate conflict resolution not only by whether a dispute ends but also by whether communication networks remain open afterward, whether groups continue participating in shared institutions, and whether previously less influential residents acquire meaningful access to deliberative arenas. Such indicators move the evaluation of rural harmony from ceremonial consensus toward relational resilience. They also articulate the central contribution of this study: social cohesion in a multicultural Muslim village is neither an automatic consequence of shared religion nor the product of a single leader; it is a negotiated institutional accomplishment produced through the interaction of agency, Islamic social capital, meaningmaking, governance, and power. 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1. Conclusions This study concludes that social harmony in Tanjung Medan Village is not a static condition defined by the absence of conflict, but a continuously negotiated social process shaped by community leadership, local institutions, religious values, and village governance. Community leaders function not merely as respected figures but as relational actors who connect residents © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 800 across ethnic and social boundaries, mediate emerging tensions, facilitate deliberation, mobilize collective participation, and bridge informal community networks with formal village government. Through Parsons’ AGIL framework, these processes can be understood as interconnected mechanisms of adaptation to socio-cultural differences, attainment of shared community goals, integration through collective institutions, and maintenance of social values. Mead’s symbolic interactionism further explains how meanings of solidarity, mutual responsibility, and peaceful coexistence are constructed and reinforced through repeated social interaction. The study therefore demonstrates that the sustainability of harmony depends not simply on the authority of individual leaders, but on their capacity to activate and connect the social relationships and institutions through which differences are continuously negotiated. This interpretation also requires attention to unequal social positions, because consensus does not automatically indicate substantive inclusion. The participation and bargaining position of Javanese, Nias, and other groups remain important for assessing whether community harmony is genuinely inclusive. This corresponds with the manuscript’s finding that ethnic position, social status, and access to community authority may shape participation and bargaining power within deliberative processes. 5.2. Suggestions Based on these findings, several suggestions can be proposed. First, community leaders should strengthen inclusive and participatory deliberation by ensuring that residents from different ethnic and social backgrounds have equal opportunities to express their concerns and participate in decision-making processes. The principal theoretical contribution of this study lies in conceptualizing STM and wirit as interconnected forms of Islamic social capital and social infrastructure. STM transforms mutual assistance from an episodic act into a recurring mechanism that can generate trust, reciprocity, shared norms, solidarity, and cross-ethnic relationships. Wirit performs a complementary function by providing a recurrent socio-religious space through which values of brotherhood, mutual assistance, tolerance, and peaceful coexistence are communicated and reproduced. Within Parsons’ framework, STM primarily supports Integration, whereas wirit contributes to Latency; through Mead, both institutions acquire social significance because their meanings are continuously constructed through interaction. The novelty of the study therefore extends beyond the familiar conclusion that community leaders are important for harmony. It explains how their agency operates through STM, wirit, musyawarah, mutual cooperation, and relationships with village government, thereby connecting Islamic values, informal social norms, and formal local governance. This mechanism-based explanation is also identified in the manuscript as its central contribution. Practically, the findings imply that strengthening social cohesion should focus on sustaining inclusive community institutions rather than relying primarily on intervention after conflict occurs. Village government and community leaders need to preserve communication networks capable of recognizing social tension at an early stage, while STM, wirit, and musyawarah should remain accessible spaces for interaction across ethnic and social boundaries. Particular attention should be given to the quality of participation in deliberation. The existence of consensus alone is insufficient if residents with weaker social positions have limited opportunities to articulate their © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 801 interests. Strengthening harmony therefore requires meaningful representation, transparent communication, and multiple channels through which residents can engage community leaders and village authorities. Such an approach positions conflict prevention as an everyday process of maintaining relationships rather than an emergency response undertaken only after social tension becomes visible. These conclusions should nevertheless be interpreted within the context-specific character of a qualitative case study in Tanjung Medan Village. The mechanisms identified here cannot automatically be generalized to other multicultural rural communities with different ethnic compositions, religious networks, political structures, or forms of local leadership. Future research should therefore compare several multi-ethnic villages to examine whether STM, wirit, musyawarah, and community-leader brokerage operate through similar mechanisms in different socio-cultural settings. Longitudinal research is also needed to examine how these mechanisms respond to leadership succession, electoral competition, migration, and socio-economic transformation. Overall, the study proposes that social harmony in a multicultural Muslim rural community is a negotiated institutional accomplishment produced through the interaction of community-leader agency, Islamic social capital, shared meaning, inclusive deliberation, and local governance. This formulation provides a more dynamic basis for understanding rural social cohesion while offering a framework that can be critically tested in future Islamic Community Development research. 6. REFERENCES Abdul Rehman, K. (2017). Islamic Liberation Theology: Qur'anic Hermeneutics for the Challenges of the Modern Age. ICR Journal, 8(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.52282/icr.v8i1.213 Afsaruddin, A. (2009). The hermeneutics of inter‐faith relations: Retrieving moderation and pluralism as universal principles in qur’anic exegeses. Journal of Religious Ethics, 37(2), 331–354. Ahmed, S. (2013). Progressive https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137282057_4 Islam and Quranic Hermeneutics. Akao, J. O. (2013). THE TASK OF AFRICAN THEOLOGY – PROBLEMS AND SUGGESTIONS. Scriptura, 81(0), 341. https://doi.org/10.7833/81-0-737 Akhtar, M. S., & Rao, M. A. A. (2023). Islamic Intellectualism versus Modernity: Attempts to Formulate Coherent Counter Narrative. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.131.18 Alak, A. (2024). The Impact of the Islamic Theories of Revelation on Humanist Qurʾanic Hermeneutics. Studia Islamika. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341484 Aldunate, J. (1994). Human Rights as the Rights of the Poor: the perspective from Liberation Theology. Journal of Moral Education, 23(3), 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305724940230307 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 802 Alexander, L. E. (2019). Human Rights as “Law of Nations” in Conversation with Contemporary Christian and Islamic Liberation Theologies. In Post-Christian Interreligious Liberation Theology (pp. 47– 68). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27308-8_4 Ali, M. Y., & Bakar, O. (2023). Abul Kalam Azad’s Idea of Religious Pluralism for an Inclusive Indian Nationalism: A Civilizational Revisit. Shajarah. https://doi.org/10.31436/shajarah.v28i2.1720 Ali, S. S. (2023). Iqbalian Liberation Theology: Spiritual Self-Affirmation, Meritocratic Democracy, and Non-hegemonic International Orders. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41965-2_3 Allan, K. (2022). Hermeneutics and Islamic Liberation Theologies: Hasan Hanafi and Hamid Dabashi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92754-7_11 Allen, M., & Webster, J. (2022). Divine Transcendence and the Reading of Scripture. https://doi.org/10.5040/9780567699299.ch-004 Ananda, R. A., Fata, A. K., & Parray, T. A. (2025). Reinterpreting Islamic Authenticity: Hassan Hanafi’s Sacred-Profane Dialectic and Its Implications for Social Transformation. International Journal of Religious and Interdisciplinary Studies (IJoRIS), 2(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.64529/jrtx0651 Anggraeni, R. D. (2023). Islamic Law and Customary Law in Contemporary Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and Constraints. Ahkam Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 23(1). https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32110 Asghar, M. S., & Saqib, K. M. (2024). The Divine Singularity: Unity and Oneness in Islam. https://doi.org/10.53762/alnasr.03.02.e05 Azadegan, E. (2024). Almighty, Freedom, and Love: Toward an Islamic Open Theology. Open Theology. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2024-0009 Barrera Rivera, D. A. (2022). Teología Latinoamericana de la Liberación: Una valoración. Revista de Filosofía de La Universidad de Costa Rica, 61(161), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.15517/revfil.2022.52586 Barr, W. R. (1987). Debated Issues in Liberation Theology. Theology Today, 43(4), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/004057368704300405 Bashir, H. (2023). Islam and the Emancipatory Ethic: Islamic Law, Liberation Theology and Prison Abolition. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091083 Bashir, K., & Wilson, M. (2017). Unequal among Equals: Lessons from Discourses on ‘Dalit Muslims’ in Modern India. Social Identities. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1281112 Belhaj, A. (2024). Emancipation through Critique: Critical Islam and the Ethical Question. Islamijah. https://doi.org/10.30821/islamijah.v5i3.22242 Bialecki, J. (2018). Anthropology, Theology, and the https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198797852.003.0010 Problem of Incommensurability. Boff, L. (2014). Ecology & liberation: A new paradigm. Orbis Books. Bowen, W. R. (2010). Ethics and the Engineer: Developing the Basis of a Theological Approach. Studies in Christian Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946810368021 Broom, A. (2021). Conceptualizing Qualitative https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211024951 Data. © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia Qualitative Health Research. AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 803 Carvalhaes, C. (2022). Worship and Spirituality. In Christianity in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 347–359). Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474492140.003.0035 Chatterton, P. (2020). Beyond capitalist enclosure, commodification and alienation: Postcapitalist praxis as commons, social production and useful doing. Progress in Human Geography, 44(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132518821173 Chatterjee, E. (2024). Gender and the Changing Feminist Discourse in Islam – A Socio-Historical Analysis. Eastern Studies Letters. https://doi.org/10.51470/esl.2024.5.1.01 Chaudhry, S. (2023). Towards a Theology of Class Struggle: A Critical Analysis of British Muslims’ Praxis against Class Inequality. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091086 Ciftci, M. (2018a). Qur’an of the Oppressed: Liberation Theology and the Gender Justice in Islam. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 29(4), 526–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2018.1518019 Ciftci, M. (2018b). Qur’an of the Oppressed: Liberation Theology and the Gender Justice in Islam. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 29(4), 526–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2018.1518019 Copeland, E. L. (1997). Christian Theology and World Religions. Review & Expositor, 94(3), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/003463739709400308 Copeland, V. (2023). ABOLITIONIST PRAXIS AND BLACK GEOGRAPHIES IN SOCIAL WORK. In New Approaches to Inequality Research with Youth Theorizing Race Beyond the Traditions of Our Disciplines (pp. 97-110). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303800-10 Croasmun, M. D. (2022). Theology for the Life of the World. International Journal of Systematic Theology. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijst.12626 De La Noval, R. J. (2024). Pelagianism Redivivus: The Free Will Theodicy for Hell, Divine Transcendence, and the End of Classical Theism. Modern Theology, 40(3), 530-550. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12894 Duderija, A. (2020). Contemporary Muslim Male Reformist Thought and Gender Equality Affirmative Interpretations of Islam. Feminist Theology, 28(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735019886076 Engineer, A. (1989). Communalism and communal violence in India: An analytical approach to HinduMuslim conflict. Ajanta Publications. Engineer, A. (2005). The Qurʼan, women, and modern society. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. Engineer, A. A. (1990a). Islam and liberation theology: essays on liberative elements in Islam. Sterling Publ. Engineer, A. A. (1990b). Islam and liberation theology: essays on liberative elements in Islam. Sterling Publ. Engler, M. (2000). Toward the ‘Rights of the Poor’ Human Rights in Liberation Theology. Journal of Religious Ethics, 28(3), 339–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/0384-9694.00053 Esack, F. (1988). Three Islamic strands in the South African struggle for justice. Third World Quarterly, 10(2), 473–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436598808420068 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 804 Esack, F. (1991). Contemporary religious thought in South Africa and the emergence of Qur’anic hermeneutical notions. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 2(2), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596419108720958 Eschenbach, E. A., Cashman, E., Waller, A. A., & Lord, S. M. (2005). Incorporating feminist pedagogy into the engineering learning experience. Frontiers in Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1612156 Fadhil, H. M. (2023). Cultivating Feminist Hermeneutics As The Interpretation Of Al-Qur’an: A Comparative Study Between Asghar Ali Engineer And Muhammad Al-Ghazali. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Ushuluddin. https://doi.org/10.18592/jiiu.v22i1.10587 Fauziah, N. R., & Rizqiyyah, S. (2023). Women’s Liberation Theology: A Study of Asghar Ali Engineer’s Thoughts on Gender Issues. Al-Hakam. https://doi.org/10.35896/alhakam.v3i2.628 Feener, R. M. (2021). Engineering transformations in the ‘religion-development nexus’: Islamic law, reform, and reconstruction in Aceh. Religion, 51(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1792051 Firdaus, F., & Nurhayati, A. (2025). Progressive Islamic theology as a third pathway in Abdullah Saeed’s contemporary revival thought. Kontemplasi: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin. https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2025.13.01.109-131 Franke, W. (2019). A Negative Theological Critique of Postmodern Identity Politics. Religions, 10(8), 488. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10080488 Frank, R. M. (1992). The Science of Kalām. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, 2(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0957423900001557 Frizzell, M. J. (2020). Contemporary Theology as Dialogue: The Evolution of Modern Theology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2489-9_20 Gaffney, P. D. (2023). The prophet's pulpit: Islamic preaching in contemporary Egypt. University of California Press. Gagnon, P. (2020). A Contingency Interpretation of Information Theory as a Bridge Between God’s Immanence and Transcendence. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_14 Gambetta, D., & Hertog, S. (2009). Why are there so many Engineers among Islamic Radicals? European Journal of Sociology, 50(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609990129 Goddard, E., Grant, R., Tatman, L., Baltzly, D., Leon de la Barra, B. A., & Black, R. (2021). Women in Philosophy, Engineering & Theology: gendered disciplines and projects of critical re-imagination. Womens Studies International Forum. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.WSIF.2021.102479 Godoy-Vieira, A. (2026). Conclusion: From Meaningful Alienation to Emancipatory Praxis –The Role of Social Movements. In Life and Labour Contested Occupation and Meaningful Alienation. Springer. Gosebrink, L. (2023). An Analytical-hermeneutic Methodology (pp. 5–7). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3658-43626-1_2 Gutiérrez, G. (1988). A Theology of Liberation. Monthly Review, 36(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.14452/MR036-03-1984-07_11 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 805 Hacker, S. L. (1981). The Culture of Engineering: Woman, Workplace and Machine. Women’s Studies International Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(81)96559-3 Hasan, A. (2019). Decoding the Egalitarianism of the Qur’an. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781666990454 Haustein, J. (2021). Development as a form of religious engineering? Religion and secularity in development discourse. Religion, 51(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2020.1792049 Hidayatulloh, T., & Saumantri, T. (2023). Theology of Peace Based on Religious Harmony in Asghar Ali Engineer’s Perspective. Ilmu Ushuluddin. https://doi.org/10.15408/iu.v10i1.32289 Ichwan, Moh. N., & Salisu, A. (2024). Reevaluating Qur’anic Hermeneutics: A Comparative Analysis Between Classical Tafsir and Modern Hermeneutical Approaches. Jurnal Studi Agama Dan Pemikiran Islam. https://doi.org/10.24042/kalam.v18i2.24213 Jaeger, L. (2020). The Twin Truths of Divine Immanence and Transcendence: Creation, Laws of Nature and Human Freedom. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31182-7_4 Jeanrond, W. G. (2024). Faith in a Troubled Church and a Fragmented World. Toronto Journal of Theology. https://doi.org/10.3138/tjt-2023-0047 Jilham, A., & Putra, K. (2023). Revitalizing Islamic Liberation Theology According to Asghar Ali Engineer: Insights into Human Equality, Gender Injustice, and Economic Inequality. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. https://doi.org/10.59698/nasir.v1i2.77 Jung, D. (2022). Transhumanism and Theological Anthropology: A Theological Examination of Transhumanism. Neue Zeitschrift Für Systematische Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie. https://doi.org/10.1515/nzsth-2022-0009 Karam, A. M. (2024). Interreligious Engagement as an Enabler of Gender Justice through the Common Good. Ecumenical Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12829 Khan, M. A. (2024). Justice in the Qur’an. In Islamic Economics and Human Well-being (pp. 32–65). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035333691.00011 Koga, Y. (2023). On the Nature of Faith and Its Relation to Trust and Belief. The Monist. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onac023 Kurniandi, M. A. P. (2024). Gender Equality Perspective of Asghar Ali Engineer: Challenges and Opportunities for Theological Feminists. Journal of Feminism and Gender Studies. https://doi.org/10.19184/jfgs.v4i1.44611 Lekka-Kowalik, A. (2024). Sciences and the Future of Revelation. https://doi.org/10.4324/978100348588914 Liu, S. (2024). TRANSCENDENCE AND IMMANENCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIVINE ATTRIBUTES IN MONOTHEISTIC RELIGIONS. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 16(3), 293-308. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2024.4614 Mackin, R. S. (2022). Liberation Theology/Base Communities (South America). In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements (pp. 1–3). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm331.pub2 Mahmoud, R. (2022). Islamic Theology in the Context of Attack and Defense Debates. Journal of The Near East University Faculty of Theology, 8(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.32955/neu.ilaf.2022.8.1.05 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 806 Manshur, F. M. (2021). Hasan Hanafi, new theology and cultural revolution: An analysis of cultural intensification. HTS Teologiese Studies-Theological Studies. https://doi.org/10.4102/HTS.V77I4.6190 Mariyam, Y. S., Ibrohim, M. Y. A., Fageh, A., Rosyidah, A. ’Ilma, & Hidayatullah, H. (2023). Shariah deconstruction: the thoughts of Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im. Hukum Islam. https://doi.org/10.24014/jhi.v23i1.21123 Martins, Jo. M., Guo, F., & Swanson, D. A. (2018). Gender Dilemma: Difference and Equality. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77362-9_8 Meijknecht, T. (2014). The Engineer is Professionally a Person of Faith: A Theological-Historical Perspective. Implicit Religion. https://doi.org/10.1558/IMRE.V17I2.183 Meneses, E. H., Backues, L., Bronkema, D., Flett, E. G., & Hartley, B. L. (2014). Engaging the Religiously Committed Other: Anthropologists and Theologians in Dialogue. Current Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1086/674716 Moqbel, T. H. T. (n.d.). Ethics in https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004696471 the Qurʾān and Mubarak, H. (2022). Modern Approaches https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197553305.003.0004 to the Tafsīr Qurʾanic Tradition. Brill. Interpretation. Negara, A. M. A. P., & Juliani, A. (2022). Discourse on Women’s Leadership in Islam: Asghar Ali Engineer’s Thought Analysis Study. An-Nisa’. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v15i2.88 Negara, M. A. P., & Hannah, N. (2023). Liberation Theology of Leftist Islam in the Thought of Hassan Hanafi and its Contextualization. https://doi.org/10.30983/itr.v1i1.6444 Nordin, M. K. N. C. (2023). Exploring Hans Küng’s Paradigm Theory for Understanding Religion: An Islamic Perspective. Jurnal Usuluddin. https://doi.org/10.22452/usuluddin.vol51no1.5 Nurdiansyah, P. P. D. (2025). The Paradigm of Reconstructing Fazlur Rahman’s Ethical-Legal Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an. https://doi.org/10.32939/twl.v4i1.5256 Nuryatno, M. A. (2007). Examining Asghar Ali Engineer’s Qur’anic Interpretation of Women in Islam. AlJami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.14421/AJIS.2007.452.389-414 Omar, A. (2025). The Pluralistic Frameworks of Ibn Rushd and Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’im. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009386333 Pandey, S. (2024). The Burden of Being a Muslim Woman in India—The Instrumentalisation of Muslim Women at the Intersection of Gender, Religion, Colonialism, and Secularism. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030291 Park, H. (2022). Theological Interpretation of Scripture. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108885959.015 Perry, A. (2018). Reconnecting Ethics and Theology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75043-9_3 Petrella, I. (2013). The Practice of Liberation Theology in the Twenty-First Century. In The Reemergence of Liberation Theologies (pp. 145–149). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137311825_16 Pla-Julián, I., & Díez, J. L. (2019). Gender Equality Perceptions of Future Engineers. Engineering Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2018.1530242 © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 807 Plantinga, R. J. , T. T. R. , & L. M. D. (2010). What is theology? In An Introduction to Christian Theology (pp. 3–26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800856.002 Puig Montada, J. (2023). Hasan Hanafi and ‘The Indissoluble Bond’ between Heritage and Renewal. Studia Islamica. https://doi.org/10.1163/19585705-12341476 Qodir, Z. (2024). Contemporary Islamic Thought in Indonesia 2010-2023: Contested Public Sphere. Insight Turkey, 26(2), 299-318. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2024262.15 Rahemtulla, S. (2019). The Politics of Paradigms: Liberation and Difference in Islam and Christianity. In Post-Christian Interreligious Liberation Theology (pp. 29–46). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27308-8_3 Rahemtulla, S. (2023). The Future of Islamic Liberation Theology. Religions, 14(9), 1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14091079 Ramadhan, A. N. F. (2024). Hermeneutics of Gender: A Comparative Study of Hermeneutical Models Amina Wadud and Farid Esack. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 2(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i2.10 Ram, S. (2022). Methodology and Sources of Data. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3284-7_2 Ranieri, J. J. (2022). Defending Victims, Practicing Restraint: God-Consciousness and the Use of Force in the Qur’an. Religions. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020124 Rasulov, I., & Jin, H. (2024). Integrating Theology into Migration Studies for Ethical Perspectives and Collaborative Solutions. International Journal of Religion. https://doi.org/10.61707/2cekdg59 Resky, M. (2024). Holistic Hermeneutics of Qur’anic Verses: Reinterpreting for Achieving Gender Equality in Contemporary Islamic Society. Aqwal Journal of Qur an and Hadis Studies, 5(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v5i2.7365 Resky, M., & Hasibuan, A. R. G. (2024). Issues on Gender Equality in the Qur’an Based on Amina Wadud’s Hermeneutical Approach. https://doi.org/10.71155/besari.v2i1.108 Riexinger, M. (2007). Nasserism Revitalized: A Critical Reading of Hasan Hanafī’s Projects “The Islamic Left” and “occidentalism” (and their Uncritical Reading). Die Welt Des Islams. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006007780331534 Robinson, S. A. (2023). Rosemary Radford Ruether’s Global Scope in Interfaith Reconciliation. Feminist Theology. https://doi.org/10.1177/09667350231163307 Saleem, Z. (2024). Addressing Qurʾan 4:34: Muslim Feminists’ Hermeneutics vs. Mahmoud Muhammad Taha’s Hermeneutics. Hawwa. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692086-12341420 Saumantri, T. (2023). Teologi Perdamaian dan Kerukunan Antar Agama dalam Perspektif Asghar Ali Engineer. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam. https://doi.org/10.22373/jpi.v3i2.19790 Schulenberg, U. (2012). Hermeneutics and Critical Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00406-2_6 Seddon, M. T. (2023). Toward an Anthropologically Engaged Theology: Implications from Human Evolution for Theological Anthropology. Anglican Theological Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/00033286231215300 Shah, M. (2007). Trajectories in the Development of Islamic Theological Thought: the Synthesis of Kalām. Religion Compass, 1(4), 430–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8171.2007.00026.x © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2 808 Shellenberger, M., & Nordhaus, T. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342669_15 Modernization as Liberation Theology. Sidahmed, A. S. (2011). Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na’Im, Islam and Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari’a. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice. https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V29I0.4487 Solihu, A. K. H. (2003). Understanding the Qur’ān in the light of historical change. Islamic Studies. Spencer, M. K. (2024). Deification and https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198865179.013.47 Theological Anthropology. Strohl, D. J. (2019). Engaging Tolerance: Privacy and Publicity in the Inter-religious Engagement of Mumbai’s Ismaili Muslims. Religions of South Asia. https://doi.org/10.1558/ROSA.37059 Tanner, K. (1994). The Difference Theological https://doi.org/10.1177/004057369405000407 Anthropology Tayob, A. (2025). Muslim Publics between https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003259350-9 Discourses Makes. of Theology Religion and Today. Islam. Tomass, M. (2016). The Significance of Religious Identity. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137525710_2 Verbin, N. (2020). Embracing paradox: Maimonides and Kierkegaard on divine transcendence and immanence. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 12(2), 173-194. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.v12i2.3361 Voggenauer, R. (2022). Building Islamic Thought on New Foundations: Shabestari’s Manifold Use of Hermeneutics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92754-7_7 Wadud, A. (1995). Towards a Qur’anic Hermeneutics of Social Justice: Race, Class and Gender. Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051608 Wadud, A. (2021). Reflections on Islamic https://doi.org/10.3390/REL12070497 Feminist Exegesis of the Qur’an. Religion. Wentz, R. E. (1997). Toward A Theology Of History. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195082432.003.0006 West, G. (2015). Africa’s Liberation Theologies: An Historical-Hermeneutical Analysis. In The Changing World Religion Map (pp. 1971–1985). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-0179376-6_103 Woodson, H. (2020). The Existential Demands of Race: Dialogues in Theological Anthropology. Journal of African American Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12111-020-09476-5 Yadav, A. K. (2023). Embracing Liberation: An All-Encompassing Approach to Comprehending and Resolving Global Challenges. International Journal of Science and Research. https://doi.org/10.21275/mr23806024719 Young, T. R. (1994). Postmodern Religion and the Global World Order: Postmodern Theology and Social Justice. Humanity & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/016059769401800302 Zaini, M. (2020). Methods and Thoughts in the Islamic Theology. Al-Lubb: Journal of Islamic Thought and Muslim Culture (JITMC), 2(2), 93. https://doi.org/10.51900/lubb.v2i2.8595. . © 2026 The Author(s). Published by CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa, Indonesia AJIS • Vol. 4 No. 2