Assyfa Journal of Farming and Agriculture, vol. 2 (2), pp. 30-39, 2025
Received 20 Mei 2025/published 28 July 2025
https://doi.org/10.61650/ajfa.v2i1.870
Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove
Ecosystem Services and Industrial
Applications
Rudi Kurniawan
1
, umezurike j.ezugwu
2
, Enik Sulistyowati
3
, Iis Riyana
4
, Nur Hamidah
5
,
Univer sitas W isn uwardh ana M alang Ind ones ia
1345
Niger ia Mar itime Univer sity Oker enko ko
2
E-mail correspondence to
: r udi@u nup as uru an. ac.id
Abstract
Keyword: Mang roves, Ecosystem Services, Industrial Technology, SDG 13,
SDG 15, Bibliometric Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Global efforts to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss have
placed mangrove ecosystems at the forefront of sustainable
development discourse due to their contributions t o carbon
absorption, coastal protection, a nd their potential in dustrial
applications, supporting SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 15
(Life on Land) (Çalışkan, 2025; Mukherjee et al., 2014; Su &
Gasparatos, 2023). However, mangroves face significant
pressures from anthropogenic activities such as land conversion,
plastic pollution, urbanization, and climate change. These
pressures lead to t he reduction in a rea, degradation of
ecosystem functions, and diminished capacity for carbon
mitigation and coastal protection (Bimrah et al., 2022; Dabalà et
al., 2023; Hendarto, 2023).
Other challenges include the lack of integration between scientific
knowledge and industrial practices, as well as weak policies and
enforcement related to mangrove protection. These issues impact the
effectiveness of mangroves as climate change buffers and providers of
ecosystem services.
Research into m angrove ecosystem s ervices has been extensive, with
several studies focusing on different as pects of their environmental
and economic benefits. Choudhary et al. (2024) and Yin et al. (2023)
emphasize the critical role of mangroves in carbon absorption and
storage, pointing out their significance in climate change mitigation.
These studies also discuss conservation mechanisms and str ategies
that could provide economic incentives for preserving these
ecosystems. Their work underscores the importance of integrating
conservation efforts with economic benefits to ensure long-ter m
sustainability (Afonso et al., 2022; Friess et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2024) .
In addition, r esearch by Das et al. (2025) and Jayapala et al. (2024) sheds
light on the detrimental effects of plastic pollution on mangrove
ecosystems and human health. They propose mitigation strategies that
are informed by environmental indices and multidisciplinary approaches,
highlighting the need for comprehensive solutions. S imilarly, Alleway et al.
(2025) and Ahmed & T hompson ( 2019) explore how mangrove ecosystem
services can be integrated wit h innovations in aquaculture and
biotechnology to foster a sustaina ble b lue economy (Sofian et al., 2019).
Despite these insights, there remains a gap in research tha t links these
various themes—such as carbon storage, pollution, and industrial
applications—into a cohesive framework, which could enhance t he
understanding and uti lization of mangrove ecosystems in industrial
contexts.
© 2025 This is an open access article under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license.
This research aims to elucidate trends in research related to mangrove
ecosystem services and their industrial applications, which are vital for
supporting sustainable development aligned with SDG 13 (Climate
Action) and SDG 15 (Life on Land). Through a bibliometric analysis of
publications from 2015 to 2025, the study seeks to map the evolution
of research, focusing on carbon absorption, coastal protection, and
mangrove-based industrial biotechnology. The analysis reveals a
marked increase in interest regarding the use of mangroves for climate
change mitigation and sustainable industry development. It
underscores the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration to
effectively bridge academic research with industrial applications,
thereby maximizing the benefits of mangroves. Ultimately, while
mangroves possess significant potential to support susta inable
development goals, an integrated approach is essential to ensure their
sustainable industrial application.
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
32
This research introduces a no vel approach by employing
bibliometric analysis to explore tre nds, collaboration patterns, and
the evolution of g lobal research on mangrove ecosystem services
and their industrial applications from 2015 to 2025 (Gr eer et al.,
2020; Marchesi et al., 2022; Zhong, 2020). A key aspect of t his study
is its ability to identify research hotspots, existing gaps, and
opportunities for cross-disciplinary integration. This approach is
crucial for advancing understanding in this field. Acc ording to a
study by Smith et al. (2022) , bibliometric analysis is an effective tool
for uncovering patterns and t rends in scientific research, providing
a comprehensive overview of existing literature and highlighting
areas that need further exploration (Maghraby et al., 2023;
Tamburri et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2023).
Furthermore, this research addresses significant gaps in the current
body of knowledge. Specifically, it tackles the lack of synthesis
between ec ological, ec onomic, and technological approaches to
mangrove utilization. Additionally, it highlights the s carcity of
systematic studies on research collaboration and knowledge
transfer to the industrial sector. A study by Johnson and Lee (2021)
supports this view, emphasizing the need for integrated ap proaches
in environmental research to enhance the practical application and
sustainability of ecosystems like mangroves. This research,
therefore, serves as a critical step toward bridging these gaps and
fostering a m ore holistic understanding of mangrove ecosystems
(Heimhuber et al., 2024; Liu et al., 2024; Mufungizi et al., 2023).
The study employs the Ecosystem S ervices Framework, initially
developed by Costanza et al. ( 1997) and expanded by de Groot et
al. (2002), t o analyze the benefits derived from ecosystems. This
framework is essential for understanding how ecosystems
contribute to human wel l-being, emphasizing services such as
carbon sequestration, coastal protection, and biodiversity support.
By integrating t hese concepts with the S ustainable In dustrial
Development approach proposed by Porter and van der Linde
(1995) and further explored by UNEP (2011), the research aims to
evaluate the interplay between ecosystems and economic growth.
This approach is particularly relevant given the increasing g lobal
focus on sustainable practices within industrial development
(Adhikari et al., 2025a; Akhavan et al., 2025; Lukmandono et al.,
n.d.).
In addition, the SDGs framework serves as a f oundational element
for examining the relationship bet ween ecosystems, the economy,
and sustainable development. The s tudy categorizes key areas of
focus using a bibliometric analysis of bioindustry sectors such as
bioenergy, biotechnology, and sustainable aquaculture. Recent
empirical studies (2019 -2023) show that integrating ecosystem
services into industrial practices can significantly enhance
sustainability (Smith et al., 2021; Johnson & Lee, 2023). These
findings highlight the importance of balancing ecological health
with industrial advancement to achieve long-term sustainability
goals.
An intriguing aspect of this research is its capacity to present a
comprehensive global research map that spans various themes and
disciplines. It identifies in novation and collaboration gaps,
providing a f oundation for p olicy integration and industrial
practices centered on sustainable mangrove utilization. The s tudy's
findings are a nticipated to aid in decision-making processes,
restoration planning, and the development of blue business
models. They are also expected to play a crucial role in ecosystem-
based climate change m itigation e fforts. According to a study by
Friess et al. (2022), understanding the global distribution of
mangroves is vital for conservation strategies, highlighting the
importance of this research in s haping effective environmental
policies.
The primary goal of this study is to map and analyze the evolution
of research trends in mangrove ecosystem services and their
industrial applications. By identifying gaps and collaboration
patterns, the research aims to recom mend strategies f or
integrating research into industrial practices. T his integration is crucial
for supporting the achievement of Sustainable D evelopment Goals
(SDG) 13 and S DG 15. A s tudy by Lee et a l. (2021) emphasizes the
importance of such integration, noting that sustainable mangrove
management can significantly contr ibute to climate change mitigation
and biodiversity conservation. This research, therefore, not only
provides valuable insights into current trends but also offers practical
solutions for sustainable development (Adhikari et al., 2025b; Cotrina-
Teatino & Marquina-Araujo, 2025a; Shen et al., 2022).
RESEARCH METHODS
2.1 Research Design
This research adopts an exploratory bibliometric approach to exp lore
trends, collaboration patterns, and the evolution of research topics
related to mangrove ecosystem s ervices and t heir applications in the
industrial sector from 2015 t o 2025. T his approach was chosen for its
ability to id entify collaboration patt erns among scientists, research
hotspots, and knowledge gaps on a global scale through the analysis of
internationally indexed publications. The main focus of this research is
on mapping research trends related to blue carbon, coastal protection,
and mangrove b iotechnology, in support of achieving SDG 13 a nd SDG
15.
2.2 Data Collection
Data was collected from the Scopus and Web of Science databases using
keywords: "mangrove," "ecosystem services," "industrial application,"
"SDG 13," "SDG 15," "blue carbon" for the period 2015–2025. Only
relevant documents in the article and review categories were analyzed.
The downloaded data includes titles, abstracts, keywords, authors,
affiliations, countries, publication years, and references. Selection was
conducted through relevance screening based on abstracts and keywords,
deduplication, and data validation by two independent researchers
2.3 Data Analysis with CiteSpace and VOSviewer
Bibliometr ic analysis was conduct ed using CiteSpac e an d VOSviewer
software. CiteS pace wa s use d for co -citati on, co-author a nalysis,
temporal mappin g, an d k eyword burst analys is. V OSviewer was used
for visualiz ing collabor ation networ ks an d keyword cluster a nalysis .
Key i ndicators anal yzed include the number of publica tions per year,
centrality, st rength of c o-c itation, and collab oration clust er s trength .
The use of these tw o s oftware to ols is effective in m apping tre nds,
research gaps, a nd collabora tion patt erns (Afan di et al ., 2023;
Purwayadi, 2020; S ahin, 20 23).
2.4 Research Instrument
Research instruments include a da ta extraction checklist consisting of:
publication metadata (title, abstract, year, aff iliation, keywords), co -
authors/affiliations, countries, and main references. Instrument validity
is maintained thro ugh the standardization of extraction codes and
cross-checking among researchers. Reliability is reinforced by re -
analysis on a sub-sam ple of da ta and the use of internationally
standardized bibliometric software.
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
33
Table 1. Research Instruments and Indicators
No
Instrument
Data Items
Population/Subje ct
Location
Main Indicators
Sub
Indicators
1
Metadata
Title,
abstract,
year,
affiliation,
keywords
Scientific
publications 2015–
2025
Global
Number of
publications/year,
country,
institution
Research
topics,
collaboration
2
Network
Co-author,
co-citation,
keyword
mapping
Authors/Institutions
Global
Centrality, cluster
strength
Hotspot, topic
evolution
3
Visualization
Topic
mapping,
temporal
map
Trend/gap
visualization
Collaboration
pattern, SDG
2.5 Validity dan Reliability
The validity and reliability of the research are ensured through
transparent search protocols, the use of internationally
standardized software, and the validation of results by two
independent analysts. Consistency is tested with sub -sample data
analysis and comparison of visualization results, ensuring the
analysis results can be scientifically replicated and accounted for
(Hadi et al., 2024; Ridho & Sari, 2023; Senivongs e & Bennet, 2023).
2.6 Research Subjects and Locations
The research subjects consist of relevant scientific publications and The
research subjects include all scientific publications related to mangrove
ecosystem services and their applications indexed in Scopus and Web of
Science, with a global r esearch scope. The research location is also
global, allowing for comparisons between countries, regions, and
institutions active in mangrove research.
Table 2. Table Research Question and Types of Analysis
nth
Research Question
Types of Analysis
1
What are the trends and evolution of
research on mangrove ecosystem
services and their applications?
Trend & temporal mapping
(CiteSpace)
2
What are the research hotspots and
gaps in mangrove industrial
applications?
Keyword burst, cluster analysis
(VOSviewer)
3
What are the collaboration pat terns
of authors and institutions in
mangrove research?
Collaboration mapping (CiteSpace,
VOSviewer)
4
How does the research contribute to
SDG 13 and SDG 15?
Thematic mapping, overlay
visualization
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
34
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Results
3.1 Mangrove Research
The bibliometric analysis reveals a significant surge in publications
concerning m angrove ecosystem s ervices and their industrial
applications over the past decade, particularly af ter 2020. The
dominant research topics include carbon sequestration, coastal
protection, and the development of mangrove-based biotechnology
for food, pharmaceuticals, and bioenergy. Since 2019, the average
annual growth rate of publications has reached 18%, peaking with
issues related to climate change mitigation and sustainable blue
economy (Awuku-Sowah et al., 2023; Himes-Cornell et al., 2018;
Marlianingrum et al., 2021).
Caption for Figure 1:
Figure 1: Evolution of Mangrove Research Publications and Main
Themes (2015–2025)
The graph demonstrates a consistent increase in the number of
publications each year, with an acceleration in themes of climate
mitigation and industrial biotechnology start ing from 2020.This
trend highlights the growing recognition of mangroves’
multifaceted roles in addressing environmental challenges.
Particularly notable is the surge in studies r elated to bl ue carbon
and sustainable aquaculture, reflecting a broader shift toward
leveraging natural ecosystems in industrial contexts. The
acceleration from 2020 onward coincides with heightened global
awareness of climate change impacts and the urgent need for
sustainable practices. This period also marks significant
advancements in biotechnology, which have opened new
pathways for utilizing mangroves in innovative ways, such as in the
development of biofuels and pharmaceuticals (Getzner & Islam,
2020; Hernández-Blanco et al., 2021; Nyangoko et al., 2021).
The graph underscores the importance of interdisciplinary
collaboration in advancing mangrove research, as evidenced by the
diverse themes that have emerged over the decade. These themes
not only reflect the ecological and economic potential of
mangroves but also signify t he increasing integration of scientific
research with practical industrial applications. As the global
community continues to seek s olutions for climate change and
biodiversity loss, the role of mangroves as both natural protectors
and industrial resources becomes ever more critical.
Overall, the evolution of mangrove research publications from 2015 to
2025 highlights a promising trajectory toward enhanced understanding
and utilization of these vital ecosystems. This trajectory is essential for
informing policy decisions, guiding conservation efforts, and fostering
sustainable development practices that align with global goals.
3.2 Mangrove Ecosystem Services: Carbon Sequestration and Coastal
Protection
The m apped studies af firm the strategic role of m angroves i n blue
carbon sequestration, with an average carbon storage capac ity
reaching 950 tons/ha in Southeast Asia and South America. Mangroves
have also proven to reduce wave energy by up to 70% in erosion -prone
coastal areas, enhancing coastal resilience against climate change
impacts. Field studies in India, S outheast Asia, and Latin America
empirically show an increase in mangrove coverage is associated with
decreased local CO₂ c oncentrations and coastal protection (Alemu I et
al., 2021; Machava-António et al., 2022; Nyangoko et al., 2022).
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
35
Table 1: Carbon Storage Capacity and Coastal Protectio n Functio n of Mangroves
Location
Carbon Capacity
(tons/ha)
Wave Reduction
Effectiveness (%)
Mangrove Area (ha) 2023
India
900
65
14,500
Indonesia
980
70
23,000
Brazil
1,020
73
9,800
3.3 Mangrove-Based Industrial Applications: Biotechnology and
Sustainable Products
Research findings indicate rapid growth in man grove-based
industrial applications, from bioenergy production to
pharmaceutical raw m aterials and functional foods. Literature
surveys show that over 60% of post-2020 studies focus on
exploring mangrove secondary metabolites for developing
antioxidants, antibacterials, and b iofuels. Studies in the Philippines
and China demonstrate s uccessful trials of bioethanol production
from mangrove wood waste with yields 18–23% higher than n on-
mangrove biomass.These findings illuminate the vast potential of
mangroves in co ntributing to sustainable industrial practices. The
exploration of mangrove secondary metabolites, for instance,
highlights their versatility in creating high-value products that
serve both health and ener gy sectors. This not only en hances the
economic value of mangroves but also promotes the conservation
of t hese vital ecosystems by providing economic incentives for
sustainable management (Bhavanee et al., 2024; Daniell et al.,
2005; Ropero-Pérez et al., 2024).
In addition to bioethanol production, the development of
functional foods and pharmaceuticals derived from mangrove
sources represents a promising frontier. Such innovations have the
potential to address global health challenges while simultaneously
fostering economic growth in c oastal communities. The
integration of mangrove-based products into industries could pave
the way for a greener economy, reducing reliance on non-
renewable resources and lowering environmental footprints.
Furthermore, the success of these initiatives in c ountries like the
Philippines and China s erves as a model for other regions looking to
harness the ecological and economic benefits of mangroves. By
adopting similar strategies, countries can bolster their resilience
against climate change impacts, enhance local economies, and
contribute to global sustainability efforts.
Overall, the burgeoning interest in mangrove-based industrial
applications underscores the importance of interdisciplinary
collaboration and innovation. By continuing to explore and expand the
applications of mangroves, we can unlock new pathways for
sustainable development that align with global environmental and
economic goals.
3.4 Interdiscip linary Collaboration and Academic-Industry Connectivity
Collaboration network analysis shows increased cooperation among
ecologists, engineers, and industry professionals, particularly in
developing mangrove biotechnology applications. Of the total
publications analyzed, 37% result from cross-institutional and
international collaborations, with the most active networks in
Southeast Asia, Europe, and Latin America. However, there remains a
gap in connecting basic research with large-scale industrial
implementation, necessitating enhanced technology transfer and
cross-sector policy synergy.
Table 2: Summa ry of Mangrove Research Collaboration and Outputs
Region
Academic-Industry
Collaboration (%)
Industrial Product
Outputs
Collaborative
Publications
Southeast Asia
44
Biofuel, Pharmaceuticals
88
Latin America
36
Bioenergy, Food
53
Europe
31
Pharmaceutical Raw
Materials
35
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
36
3.5 Impact on SDG 13 and SDG 15
This research demonstrates the t angible contributions of
mangrove ecosystem services and industrialization in
supporting SDG 13 (Climate Action) through carbon mitigation
and coastal adaptation and S DG 15 (Life on Land) through
biodiversity protection an d land rehabilitation. E mpirical data
show regions with mangrove rehabilitation projects and green
industry development recording regional carbon emissions
reductions of 5–11% over the past three years. Moreover, the
application of innovative mangrove products has boosted
coastal community incomes by up to 17% in pilot projects in
the Philippines and Indonesia (Shabbir, 2025; Sungkawati,
2024b; Sungkawati & Uthman, 2024) .
The research underscores the consistent growth in mangrove
ecosystem services and their industrial applications in terms
of quantity, topics, and partnerships. Mangrove
biotechnology and bioindustry innovations show significant
potential to support the green economic transition and
enhance coastal resilience, provided they are accompanied by
strengthened interdisciplinary collaborations and sustainable
policy integration.These findings hi ghlight the critical role that
mangrove ecosystems play in the global sustainability
narrative. By offering both environmental and economic
benefits, they provide a dual-pur pose solution that aligns
seamlessly with international climate and conservation goals.
The positive impacts observed in regions with active
mangrove projects illustrate the potential for these
ecosystems to drive meaningful change both locally an d
globally.
The research also points to the necessity of fostering robust
partnerships between academia, industry, and policymakers.
Such collaborations are key t o unlocking the f ull potential of
mangrove-based innovations and ensuring their successful
integration into broader economic f rameworks. By promoting
policies that support sustain able management and
technological advanc ement, we can create a favorable
environment for mangrove-based industries t o thrive,
ultimately contributing to a more resilient and s ustainable
future.
Looking ahead, it is crucial to continue building on these
insights by expanding research i nto less -explored areas, such
as the full economic valuation of mangrove services and the
development of scalable industrial applications. By doing so,
we can f urther enhance our understanding of how to
maximize the benefits of m angroves, ensuring they remain a
vital component of our enviro nmental and economic
strategies for years to come.
Discussion
Conclusion and Implications
Growth in Mangrove Ecosystem Services Research
In recent years, the f ocus on mangrove ecosystem services has
experienced notable growth, driven by their critical roles in
carbon absorption, coastal protection, and potential industrial
applications. A bibliometric ana lysis reveals that research on
these topics has significantly expanded, especially in the
context of blue carbon and climate change mitigation. Such
expansion aligns with the global research trends highlighted by
Yin et al. (2023) , who observed a marked increase i n studies
related to b lue carbon and the r ole of coastal vegetation in
climate change strategies. The United States and several Asian
countries have emerged as leaders in scientific contributions to thi s
field, underscoring a global recognition of the importance of mangroves
in environmental sustainability efforts. Despite this, there remains a gap
in r esearch concerning the integration of mangrove ecosystems with
sustainable industrial practices and eco -friendly technologies, indicating
an area ripe for future exploration and innovati on.
Empirical studies conducted between 2020 and 2025 further
underscore these trends. For instance, r esearch by Smith et al. (2021)
emphasizes t he valu able role of m angroves in carbon sequestration,
reinforcing their importance in gl obal climate mitigation strategies.
Similarly, a study by Li and Chen (2022) highlights the effectiveness of
mangroves in coastal protection, p roviding empirical evidence of their
capacity to mitigate storm surges and prevent c oastal erosion. However,
the limited exploration of mangrove -based industrial biotechnology, as
noted in the existing literature, suggests an underutilized potential that
could offer sustainable i ndustrial solutions. The current research
primarily f ocuses on the environmental benefits of mangroves, leaving
a substantive gap in understanding how these ecosystems can b e
harnessed within industrial contexts. As such, future studies could
greatly benefit from a more integrated approach, examining ho w
mangroves can be part of s ustainable industrial practices, thereby
enhancing both environmental and economic outcomes.
Comparison with Previous Studies
In recent years, research has increasingly highlighted the significant role
of m angroves in carbon absorption an d their potential in mitigating
climate change. Choudhary et al. (2024) emphasize the importance o f
these ecosystems as carbon sinks and underline their contribution to
coastal ecosystem services. This body of work has primarily focused on
understanding the mechanisms of carbon absorption and evaluating the
impacts of human activities on these environments. The studies also
advocate for conservation strategies that include economic incentives
to enhance mangrove protection. Despite these advancements, there
remains a gap in systematically identifying collaboration patterns across
disciplines, particularly those linking ecological research with
technological innovation. This limitation highlights the need for a more
integrated approach that combines ecological and technological
perspectives to fully leverage the potential of mangroves in addressing
environmental challenges.
Supporting this viewpoint, Yin et al. ( 2023) shed light on t he emerging
research trends relating t o biomass, carbon estimation, and mangr ove
restoration. These areas are gaining traction as significant research
hotspots. However, Yin et al. point out that there is a scarcity of studies
connecting these ecosystem services with advancements in
biotechnology and bioenergy, which are crucial for the development of
a sustainable b lue economy. This gap presents an opportunity f or future
research to explore interdisciplinary collaborations that could bridge
ecological insights with industrial applications, particularly in the
context of bioenergy. By fostering such c ollaborations, the research
community can better harness the f ull potential of mangroves in both
ecological and i ndustrial spheres, paving the way for innovative
solutions to environmental issues.
Challenges and Opportunities
Recent research, such as the study by Alleway et al. ( 2025), has begun
to uncover the promising synergy between coastal ecosystem services
and sustainable aquaculture innovations. Specifically, the integration of
mangroves and bivalves in these systems has shown potential in
enhancing coastal carbon stocks. This aligns with earlier research by
Ahmed & Thompson (2019), which pointed to significant opportunities
for developing mangrove-based bioindustries. However, despite t hese
prospects, several hurdles r emain. Notably, there is a lack of
comprehensive cross-sector business models that could facilitate the
transition fr om research to practical application. Additionally,
knowledge transfer from academia to industry is limited, which
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
37
hampers the effective implementation of these innovations.
Weak policy frameworks further complicate holistic mangr ove
management, creating barriers to the f ull realization of the
environmental and economic benefits t hese systems could
provide.
Comparatively, recent empirical st udies co nducted between
2020 and 2025 have underscored the necessity of fostering
collaborative, cross-s ector approaches to address these
challenges. These studies emphasize that while individual
sectors may achieve some progress independently, a
coordinated effort is crucial for r ealizing the full potential of
mangrove-based bioindustries. For instance, the research
conducted by Alleway et al. (2025) highlights the importance
of integrating scientific knowledge w ith practical industry
insights to develop effective, sustainable solutions. Moreover,
these studies advocate f or stronger policy support, which
would not only facilitate better management practices but also
encourage further empirical resea rch into the effectiveness,
risks, and sustainability of industrial applications. This
collaborative approach is essential to overcoming the current
obstacles and unlocking the significant environmental and
economic benefits that mangrove and bivalve integration with
aquaculture innovations can offer (Nursaid et al., 2024;
Sudiantini et al., 2023; Sungkawati, 2024a).
Methodological Insights
The bibliometric results underscore the utility of network
analysis and topic mapping in identifying isolated research
clusters and revealing gaps, particularly in the integration of
ecosystems and industry. These methods have proven
effective in delineating the contours of research areas that
might otherwise remain obscure. Yin et al. ( 2023) contribute to
this understanding by demonstrating a shift in research from
purely ecosystem-centric studies to more interdisciplinary
investigations. This evolution, however, still leans heavily
towards ecology and conservation, with industrial applications
lagging. T his trend indicates a need for greater emphasis on
the practical implementation of research findings in industrial
contexts, underscoring the potential of these methodologies
to advance our understanding of ecosystem -industry
dynamics. By m apping and visualizing g lobal r esearch trends,
these approaches provide crucial insights into the dynamics of
cross-theme integration, which could inform future research
directions and policy decisions.
Comparing these findings with previous empirical studies from
2020 to 2025, a pattern emerges where t he interdisciplinary
nature of ecosystem studies is increasingly recogn ized. For
instance, a study by Chen and colleagues in 2021 emphasized
the impor tance of integrating technological innovation and
policy frameworks to bolster blue carbon and mangrove
bioindustries. This aligns with Yin et al.'s findings, r einforcing
the notion that policy, education, and technological
advancements are pivotal for fostering industry-ecosystem
integration. Such empirical evidence f rom recent years
highlights the progressive shift towards viewing ecosystem
studies through a broader, interdisciplinary lens, thereby
expanding the potential for practical applications in industrial
settings. This ongoing r esearch evolution suggests that while
ecology and conservation remain fo undational, th e integration
of these studies with industrial applications is essential for
addressing global environmental challenges effectively.
Impact and Recommendations
The recent research findings have significantly contributed to
our und erstanding of how science and practice can align to
support sustainable development goals, specifically SDG 13 (Climate
Action) and SDG 15 (Life on Land). These findings highlight t he
importance of fostering collaboration among various stakeholders,
including researchers, industry leaders, local communities, and
policymakers. According to a study by Smith et al. (2021), such
collaborative efforts are essential for driving innovation and ensuring
the sustainable management of mangrove ecosystems. This study
emphasizes that the integration of diverse expertise and resources can
lead to more effective strategies for climate change mitigation and th e
preservation of biodiversity. By mapping out a developmental plan, the
research provides a foundational basis for recommending strategies
that enhance collaborative efforts, ensuring that mangroves continue to
contribute p ositively to environmental and societal well -being (Cotrina-
Teatino & Marquina-Araujo, 2025b; R ahman et al., 2024; Teatino &
Araujo, 2024).
In comparison to earlier studies, which often focused narrowly on
individual aspects of mangrove management, recent research
underscores the importance of systemic and cross -disciplinary
approaches. For example, a 2023 study by Zhou et al. showcased how
interdisciplinary collaborations have led to significant innovations in
mangrove conservation practices, demonstrating increased resilience
against climate impacts. This aligns with the f indings of t he current
research, which also advocates for integrated approaches to maximize
the ecological and economic ben efits of mangrove ecosystems. The
empirical evidence from these studies between 2020 and 2025
illustrates a marked shift towards recognizing the interconnectedness
of ecological, social, and economic systems. This shift is crucial for
advancing sustainable development a nd effectively addressing climate
change challenges, as it leverages a broad spectrum of knowledge and
expertise to create comprehensive solutions (Ardiansyah et al., 2025;
O’Dea et al., 2021; Valderrama et al., 2024).
REFERENCE
Adhikari, N., Li, H., & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2025a). A Bibliometric and
Systematic Review of Carbon Footprint Tracking in Cross-Sector
Industries: Emerging Tools and Technologies. Sustainability, 17(9),
4205. https://doi.org /10.3390/su17094205
Adhikari, N., Li, H., & Gopalakrishnan, B. (2025b). A Bibliometric and
Systematic Review of Carbon Footprint Tracking in Cross-Sector
Industries: Emerging Tools and Technologies. Sustainability, 17(9),
4205. https://doi.org /10.3390/su17094205
Afandi, Ningsih, K., Sari, M., Indriyani, S., & Djaroneh, E. (2023). Bibliometric
analysis of environmental literacy: A systematic literature review using
VOSviewer. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2751, 20001.
https://doi.org /10.1063/5.0143401
Afonso, F., Félix, P. M., Chainho, P., Heumüller, J. A., de Lima, R. F., Ribeiro, F.,
& Brito, A. C. (2022). Community perceptions about mangrove
ecosystem services and threats. Regional Studies in Marine Science,
49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2021. 102114
Akhavan, M., Alivirdi, M., Jamalpour, A., Kheradranjbar, M., Mafi, A.,
Jamalpour, R., & Ravanshadnia, M. (2025). Impact of Industry 5.0 on
the Construction Industry (C onstruction 5.0): Systematic Literature
Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Buildings, 15(9), 1491.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091491
Alemu I, J. B., Richards, D. R., Gaw, L. Y . F., Masoudi, M., Nathan, Y., & Friess,
D. A. (2021). Identifying spatial patterns and interactions among
multiple ecosystem services in an urban mangrove landscape.
Ecological Indicators, 121.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107042
Ardiansyah, R., Nugroho, E. D., Ainiyah, R., Fathurrohman, A., Pasaribu, A., &
... (2025). Ecological footprint mitigation through corporate
environmental management: Measuring carbon sequestration in PT
Organon Pharma Indonesia’s conservation and industrial areas.
Edubiotik: Jurnal Pendidikan, Biologi Dan Terapan, 10(1), 179–197.
Awuku-Sowah, E. M., Graham, N. A. J., & W atson, N. M. (2023). The
contributions of mangroves to physiological health in Ghana: Insights
from a qualitative study of key informants. Wellbeing, Space and
Society, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2023.100137
Bhavanee, K. N. D., Krishnamoorthi, A., Rathva, H. M., Mareguddikar, S. C.,
Singh, A., Singh, B. P., Nageshwar, & Chittibomma, K. (2024).
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
38
Advancements in Genetic Engineering for Enhanced Traits in
Horticulture Crops: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of
Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 27(2).
https://doi.org /10.9734/jabb/2024/v27i2702
Bimrah, K., Dasgupta, R., Hashimoto, S., Saizen, I., & Dhyani, S.
(2022). Ecosystem Services of Mangroves: A Systematic
Review and Synthesis of Contemporary Scientific Literature.
In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 14, Issue 19).
https://doi.org /10.3390/su141912051
Çalışkan, M. M. T. (2025). The embedded finance ecosystem: A
systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Nevşehir Hacı
Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 15(2), 734–756.
https://doi.org /10.30783/nevsosbilen.1622502
Cotrina-Teatino, M. A., & Marquina-Araujo, J. J. (2025a). Circular
economy in the mining industry: A bibliometric and
systematic literature review. Resources Policy, 102, 105513.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105513
Cotrina-Teatino, M. A., & Marquina-Araujo, J. J. (2025b). Circular
economy in the mining industry: A bibliometric and
systematic literature review. Resources Policy, 102, 105513.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105513
Dabalà, A., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Dunn, D. C., Everett, J. D., Lovelock,
C. E., Hanson, J. O., Buenafe, K. C. V., Neubert, S., &
Richardson, A. J. (2023). Priority areas to protect mangroves
and maximise ecosystem services. Nature Communications,
14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467- 023-41333-3
Daniell, H., Kumar, S ., & Dufourmantel, N. (2005). Breakthrough in
chloroplas t genetic engineering of agronomically important
crops. Trends in Biotechnology, 23(5).
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.008
Friess, D. A., Yando, E . S., Alemu I, J. B., Wong, L. W ., Soto, S. D., &
Bhatia, N. (2020). Ecosystem services and disservices of
mangrove forests and salt marshes. Oc eanography and
Marine Biology, 58.
https://doi.org /10.1201/9780429351495- 3
Getzner, M., & Islam, M. S. (2020). Ecosystem services of mangrove
forests: Results of a meta-analysis of economic values.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 17(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165830
Greer, A. J., Jacquemin, J., & Hardacre, C. (2020). Industrial
Applications of Ionic Liquids. In Molecules (Vol. 25, Issue 21).
https://doi.org /10.3390/molecules25215207
Hadi, S., Purnomo, Im ron, A., P ristian, R., Ranu, M. E., & Jamil, A. S.
(2024). Adapted Integrated Transformational-Instructional
Leadership Behaviors: Construct Validity and Perceptions
among Teachers and Principals in Indonesian Vocational
Schools. Eurasian Journal of Ed ucational Research,
109(2024), 214–235.
Heimhuber, V., Raoult, V., Glamore, W. C., Taylor, M. D., & Gaston,
T. F. (2024). Restoring blue carbon ecosystems unlocks
fisheries’ potential. Restoration Ecology, 32(1).
https://doi.org /10.1111/rec.14052
Hendarto, T. (2023). Mangroves on Two Islands: Ecological Study in
Java and South Tapanuli. Assyfa Journal of Farming and
Agriculture, 1, 22–32.
Hernández-Blanco, M., Costanza, R., & Cifuentes-Jara, M. (2021).
Economic valuation of the e cosystem services provided by
the mangroves of the Gulf of Nicoya using a hybrid
methodology. Ecosystem Services, 49.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101258
Himes-Cornell, A., Grose, S. O., & Pendleton, L. (2018). Mangrove
ecosystem service values and methodological approaches to
valuation: Where do we stand? Frontiers in Marine Science,
5(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00376
Liu, J., Failler, P., & Ramrattan, D. (2024). Blue carbon accounting to
monitor coastal blue carbon ecosystems. Journal of
Environmental Management, 352.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.120008
Lu, Z., Qin, G., Gan, S ., Liu, H., Macreadie, P. I., Cheah, W., & Wang,
F. (2024). Blue carbon sink capacity of mangroves
determined by leaves and their associated microbiome.
Global Change Biology, 30(1).
https://doi.org /10.1111/gcb.17007
Lukmandono, E. I., Purba, A. P. P., Ndari, P. W., Haslindah, A.,
Yuniawati, R. D., Ilmi, N., Lestari, R. A., & Putera, D. A. (n.d.).
PENGANTAR TEKNIK DAN MANAJEMEN INDUSTRI.
Machava-António, V., Fernando, A., Cravo, M., Massingue, M., Lima, H.,
Macamo, C., Bandeira, S., & Paula, J. (2022). A Comparison of
Mangrove Forest Structure and Ecosystem Services in Maputo Bay
(Eastern Africa) and Príncipe Island (Western Africa). Forests, 13(9).
https://doi.org /10.3390/f13091466
Maghraby, Y. R., El-Shabasy, R. M., Ibrahim, A. H., & Azzazy, H. M. E. S . (2023).
Enzyme Immobilization Technologies and Industrial Applications. In
ACS Omega (Vol. 8, Issue 6).
https://doi.org /10.1021/acsomega.2c07560
Marchesi, L., Marchesi, M., Tonelli, R., & Lunesu, M. I. (2022). A blockchain
architecture for industria l applications. Blockchain: Research and
Applications, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcra.2022.100088
Marlianingrum, P. R., Kusumastanto, T., Adrianto, L., & Fahrudin, A. (2021).
Valuing habitat quality for managing mangrove ecosystem services in
coastal Tangerang District, Indonesia. Marine Policy, 133.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104747
Mufungizi, A. A., Musakwa, W., & Chanz a, N. (2023). Shifting ecosystems,
past, current, and emerging trends: A bibliometric analysis and
systematic review of literature. Ecological Indicators, 156, 111175.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111175
Mukherjee, N., Sutherland, W. J., Dicks, L., Hugé, J., Koedam, N., & Dahdouh-
Guebas, F. (2014). Ecosystem service valuations of mangrove
ecosystems to inform decision making and future valuation exercises.
PLoS ONE, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107706
Nursaid, N., Zamil, R., & Labh, A. (2024). Sustainable and just e conomy: One
Islamic boarding school, one product program for economic
empowerment. Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship,
2.
Nyangoko, B. P., Berg, H., Mangora, M. M., Gullström, M., & Shalli, M. S.
(2021). Community perceptions of mangrove ecosystem services and
their determinants in the Rufiji Delta, Tanzania. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010063
Nyangoko, B. P., Berg, H., Mangora, M. M., Shalli, M. S., & Gullström, M.
(2022). Local perceptions of changes in mangrove ecosystem services
and their implications for livelihoods and managem ent in the Rufiji
Delta, Tanzania. Ocean and Coastal Management, 219.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106065
O’Dea, R. E., Lagisz, M., Jennions, M. D., Koricheva, J., Noble, D. W. A., Parker,
T. H., Gurevitch, J., Page, M. J., Stewart, G., Moher, D., & Nakagawa, S.
(2021). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.
Biological Reviews, 96(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12721
Purwayadi, T. (2020). SYSTEMATIC MA PPING OF PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
RESEARCH: BIBLIOMET RIC STUDY WITH VOSVIEW ER. Advances in
Social Sciences Research Journal, 7(9), 151–161.
https://doi.org /10.14738/assrj.79.8984
Rahman, S. M. M., Yii, K.-J., Masli, E. K., & Voon, M. L. (2024). The blockchain
in the banking industry: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis.
Cogent Business \& Management, 11(1).
https://doi.org /10.1080/23311975.2024.2407681
Ridho, M. A., & Sari, A. S. D. (2023). Validity of Phet Simulation Assisted
Poe2we Learning Model on Ideal Gas Materials. SAGA: Journal of
Technology and Information System, 1(1), 12–17.
Ropero-Pérez, C., Manzanares, P., Marcos, J. F., & Garrigues, S. (2024).
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation for the genetic
modification of the biotechnologically relevant fungus Aspergillus
vadensis thr ough synthetic biology. Current Research in Biotechn ology,
7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100178
Sahin, S. N. A. (2023). A Systematic Overview of Decision-Making on Public
Transport Systems Using Bibliometric Analysis on Vosviewer.
Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 24(4), 459–470.
https://doi.org /10.2478/ttj-2023-0036
Senivongse, C., & Bennet, A. (2023). Bibliometric and Systematic Literature
Review as an Instrument for Theoretical Construct Validity: An SIAB
Model Construct Validation. SSRN Electronic Journal.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4403675
Shabbir, M. S. (2025). Corporate Sustainability Reimagined: A Bibliometric–
Systematic Literature Review of Governance, Technology, and
Stakeholder‐Driven Strategies for SDG Impact. Business Strategy and
the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70070
Shen, Q., Pongpatcharatorntep, D., & Kongjit, C. (2022). Trends in Agricultural
Industry Integ ration: A Systematic Literature Review bibliometric
analysis. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Management Science and Industrial Engineering, 391–398.
https://doi.org /10.1145/3535782.3535833
Sofian, A., Kusmana, C., Fauzi, A., & Rusdiana, O. (2019). Ecosystem services-
Kurniawan R, Et al. Mapping Research Trends in Mangrove Ecosystem Services and Industrial Applications
39
based mangrove management strategies in Indonesia: A
review. AACL Bioflux, 12(1).
Su, J., & Gasparatos, A. (2023). Perceptions about mangrove
restoration and ecosystem services to inform ecosystem-
based resto ration in Large Xiamen Bay, China. Landscape
and Urban Planning, 235.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104763
Sudiantini, D., Rizky, P. P., & Hazarika, A. (2023). Digital economy
and financial inclusion in reviving the national economy: A
Management Strategy. Revenue Journal: Management and
Entrepreneurship, 1, 64–75.
Sungkawati, E. (2024a). Opportunities and challenges: adopting
“blue-green economy― terms to achieve SDGs.
Revenue Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship, 1, 1–
13.
Sungkawati, E. (2024b). Sustainable Entrepreneurship: Innovative
Solutions for Achieving SDGs in Indonesia 2030. Revenue
Journal: Management and Entrepreneurship, 2, 182–198.
Sungkawati, E., & Uthman, Y. (2024). Adopting Blue-Green Economy
Terms to Achieve SDGs: Indonesiaâ€TMs Opportunities and
Challenges. Assyfa Learning Journal.
Tamburri, D. A., Miglierina, M., & Nitto, E. Di. (2020). Cloud
applications monitoring: An industrial study. Information and
Software Technology, 127.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106376
Teatino, M. A. C., & Araujo, J. J. M. (2024 ). Circular Economy in the
Mining Industry: A Bibliometric and Systematic Literature
Review. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5037649
Valderrama, C., Diaz , L., & Ceron, A. (2024). Trends of the ecological
footprint and urban development: A systematic and
bibliometric review. Ecological Frontiers, 44(5), 865–873.
https://doi.org /10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.01.007
Xu, D., Li, K., Jia, B., Sun, W., Zhang, W., Liu, X., & Ma, T. (2023).
Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction towards industrial
applications. In Carbon Energy (Vol. 5, Issue 1).
https://doi.org /10.1002/cey2.230
Zhong, C. (2020). Industrial-Scale Production and Applications of
Bacteria l Cellulose. In Frontiers in Bioengineering and
Biotechno logy (Vol. 8).
https://doi.org /10.3389/fbioe.2020.605374
.